Terrorists support Democrats, as if there were any question.

[CJY]

Re: Terrorists support Democrats, as if there were any question.

Figured you would have nothing to say, but would still say something.

 

[CJY]

Re: Terrorists support Democrats, as if there were any question.

And why should I be worried?

Just more yappin with nothing else better to say?

 

[crunch]

Re: Terrorists support Democrats, as if there were any question.

Look who does all the yappin', and all on the same stupid subject.

 

[CJY]

Re: Terrorists support Democrats, as if there were any question.

Unlike you, I actually say something.

"all on the same stupid subject."


What? There you go again yappin w/o thought. I did not start this thread, I simply showed how/why I find it untrue. What did you say besides nothing? Furthermore, when you complain, you sound worse than those you complain about. You typically have nothing more to say more than meaningless one liners.

Take a look above, 4 posts, 5 sentences with no content. True to form. I guess that is because when you speak in volume, you forget what you say and then end up contradicting yourself as I have pointed out several times. That is what happens when you speak for the sake of it.

You never answered any of my questions either. You said I should be worried, and I asked you why. When you make fluff statements, it is very easy to see you are only "yappin."

 

[crunch]

Re: Terrorists support Democrats, as if there were any question.

150+ words in 2 posts that only attack me... now that is real yappin' without saying a word worth reading. You are a scholar and a gentleman.

 

[CJY]

Re: Terrorists support Democrats, as if there were any question.

"You are a scholar and a gentleman"

Very tired tactic. You have said similar before in an attempt to defend your claims. It does not work, nor do I care what you do or don't believe. By the way, "get a thicker skin." "How can you possibly be upset over an internet discussion?" Sound familiar? Probably not, because you talk so much you cannot remember everything you say.

"150+ words in 2 posts that only attack me... now that is real yappin' without saying a word worth reading."


What? Did you even read my first post or just start yappin? It is addressed to Boom, and then I only spoke of his post for a single paragraph. The rest of that entire post was addressed to the original question. You then copied my post and made a claim that I should be worried. I asked you why I should be. A question you cannot / did not answer. You spoke again w/o thought, and I called you on it. I guess I should not be surprised.

I like how you quantify your statement with, "worth reading." I guess that explains why you yap when you don't know what you are yappin about. You don't read.

My second post, addressed entirely to you in response to your meaningless dribble regarding my post. I wanted you to back your yappin, and also told you why you would or could not. I guess I was correct. Keep up the good work.



Sorry pointer, I will move on.

 

[txswinner]

Re: Terrorists support Democrats, as if there were any question.

Since the majority of Americans want an end to this administration, using this logic means most Americans are terrorist or supporters of terrorist.

LOGICALLY SPEAKING,

Oh yeah and should we say as the right does

TROLL, TROLL

LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT

THE CHICKEN HAWK REIN IS ON ITS WAY OUT.

 

[crunch]

Re: Terrorists support Democrats, as if there were any question.

"You are a scholar and a gentleman"

Very tired tactic. You have said similar before in an attempt to defend your claims. It does not work, nor do I care what you do or don't believe. By the way, "get a thicker skin." "How can you possibly be upset over an internet discussion?" Sound familiar? Probably not, because you talk so much you cannot remember everything you say.

"150+ words in 2 posts that only attack me... now that is real yappin' without saying a word worth reading."


What? Did you even read my first post or just start yappin? It is addressed to Boom, and then I only spoke of his post for a single paragraph. The rest of that entire post was addressed to the original question. You then copied my post and made a claim that I should be worried. I asked you why I should be. A question you cannot / did not answer. You spoke again w/o thought, and I called you on it. I guess I should not be surprised.

I like how you quantify your statement with, "worth reading." I guess that explains why you yap when you don't know what you are yappin about. You don't read.

My second post, addressed entirely to you in response to your meaningless dribble regarding my post. I wanted you to back your yappin, and also told you why you would or could not. I guess I was correct. Keep up the good work.



Sorry pointer, I will move on.

196 words of more yappin'... you are not getting any better.

 

[rolmops]

Re: Terrorists support Democrats, as if there were any question.

typical GOP,oh never mind,when I learn to post a picture i'll try again.

 

[Pony]

Re: Terrorists support Democrats, as if there were any question.

well I'm gonna be splitting my ticket...............I guess I am only partialy supporting terrorism.:'(

 

[Boomyal]

Re: Terrorists support Democrats, as if there were any question.

no brainer Pointer. It's called cut and run!

Boomer, let's be fair, it's called redeploy in the opposite direction.

UPDATE: According to PW, it is now called PHASED REDEPLOYMENT! And that's the Orwellian truth.

 

[crunch]

Re: Terrorists support Democrats, as if there were any question.

PHASED REDEPLOYMENT... Ah yes.... cut and run. 8)

 

[PW2]

Re: Terrorists support Democrats, as if there were any question.

no brainer Pointer. It's called cut and run!

Boomer, let's be fair, it's called redeploy in the opposite direction.

UPDATE: According to PW, it is now called PHASED REDEPLOYMENT! And that's the Orwellian truth.

Whatever the results of the election, as soon as the Baker report comes out, and probably after another 500 or so troops die, this is what we will do. guaranteed. Only they will no longer label it "Cut and Run"

There will be no other alternative.

You guys have been wrong every step of the way in this excursion so far, and sadly your record will remain intact.

 

[POINTER94]

Re: Terrorists support Democrats, as if there were any question.

You all have to be crazy not to see this coming. The democrats stuggle with or feel the need to redefin e reality whenever it fits their needs. Remember when Clinton didn't have sex? He had oral.. Thanks for clearing that up.

Remember when we heard that Bush was cutting funding to program? In reality he just wasn't building to their existing budgets in the amounts the libs wanted. So they simply changed reality and said he was cutting programs funding.

When libs want to raise taxes, but don't want to get caught, they raise fees, licences, permits, or in the case of the Gore tax, just take your money.

Now if they want to back out of something the just blame others for their own stupidity. Bush Lied. I voted for it before I voted against it. Calling our troops nazi's then standing behind the nazi label then blaming talk radio. Good Greif.

Running away, by any other name is running away.

 

[Haut Medoc]

Re: Terrorists support Democrats, as if there were any question.

zzz
The present admin will have to act & rectify the present course.......
I would like to see what they have in mind...
.IE: A PLAN!......JK

 

[crunch]

Re: Terrorists support Democrats, as if there were any question.

You can bet it won't be "a phased redeployment" ie: cut and run. 8)

 

[Haut Medoc]

Re: Terrorists support Democrats, as if there were any question.

We most likely never find out, once the Rehubs are booted on Tuesday.....
Then they will get to blame their failed policy on the Dems., for not 'Staying the course".....
But that is OK, I fully expect it to take 12-16 years to fix what Dumbya & Co. has started.......JK

 

[crunch]

Re: Terrorists support Democrats, as if there were any question.

LOL.... I got it!!!!! It's ok if it takes the Democrats 12 to 16 years (assuming they don't just cut and run) as long as IT'S the democrats that are in power.

Remember, it ain't over till the fat lady sings, and she ain't even got to the opera house yet.

 

[Haut Medoc]

Re: Terrorists support Democrats, as if there were any question.

Nope, you still don't get it.....
But that's OK....
Not everyone does.......d

 

[crunch]

Re: Terrorists support Democrats, as if there were any question.

So why don't you try to explain it? Then we can all tear it apart. d