Here's an argument against Welfare.

[jtexas]

Re: Here's an argument against Welfare.

ericKems, sounds like you are saying that if you are poor, the state should remove your children from your home. Also sounds like you are saying, that only "libs" would disagree with that approach.

Did I understand you correctly? You want a new government program that will separate children from their parents?

And all conservatives are with you on this?

I speak only for myself, no other. And yes you read it correct. I'm tired of paying for lazy a@@es. You want to pay for them, you can pay more taxes.There are always exceptions to every rule, disability for instance.

so...who's going to pay for your nice new beaurocracy? And who's going to pay to feed, shelter, clothe and educate the children?

 

[RubberFrog]

Re: Here's an argument against Welfare.

RF,
I now understand your obsession with my sexual identity. I saw the picture of yourself that you posted and appears that your lacking a few of the proper chromosomes. Just a little flaming?

You saying my picture didn't turn you on?

 

[Plainsman]

Re: Here's an argument against Welfare.

ericKems, sounds like you are saying that if you are poor, the state should remove your children from your home. Also sounds like you are saying, that only "libs" would disagree with that approach.

Did I understand you correctly? You want a new government program that will separate children from their parents?

And all conservatives are with you on this?

I speak only for myself, no other. And yes you read it correct. I'm tired of paying for lazy a@@es. You want to pay for them, you can pay more taxes.There are always exceptions to every rule, disability for instance.

so...who's going to pay for your nice new beaurocracy? And who's going to pay to feed, shelter, clothe and educate the children?

If you would have read what I posted, you will see that the welfare the lazy a@@ would have got will pay for it, but no more free ride for the lazy a$$. And if they are working, but not enough to make a living, fine, help them. Minimum wage is not the same as a living wage, but at least they are trying. Don't just send a check because you feel sorry for them.

 

[crunch]

Re: Here's an argument against Welfare.

so...who's going to pay for your nice new beaurocracy? And who's going to pay to feed, shelter, clothe and educate the children?

I'd say the same dollars that now pay for the "baby factories"

 

[jimonica]

Re: Here's an argument against Welfare.

lol RF, no your picture didn't do much for me, but I'm sure Mark Foley or Ted Haggard would think your just lovely.8)

 

[QC]

Re: Here's an argument against Welfare.

Awright, hangin' balls or not? I mean curveballs . . . Harmonica is hot for Frogger? I'm sooo confused. Is it jim or monica?

 

[crunch]

Re: Here's an argument against Welfare.

Awright, hangin' balls or not? I mean curveballs . . . Harmonica is hot for Frogger? I'm sooo confused. Is it jim or monica?

From an earlier post:


From other posts tonight, this jimonica has the same writing style as CJY, (although not as long winded) and uses some of the same phrases, also has the same "flame and frivolous nature" as Technofeller... could it be?

Notice how he/she/it skipped right over that? Yet the first post tonight was an attack on me on the Pelosi thread... Hmmmm.

 

[jimonica]

Re: Here's an argument against Welfare.

QC wrote,
"Is it jim or monica?"

Close guys. It's Jim and Veronica. And ya know what I've seen the some pictures of some of your wives and I'm feeling pretty darn good, I mean really, really good and I'll leave it at that.

 

[jimonica]

Re: Here's an argument against Welfare.

Custom wrote,
"From an earlier post:


From other posts tonight, this jimonica has the same writing style as CJY, (although not as long winded) and uses some of the same phrases, also has the same "flame and frivolous nature" as Technofeller... could it be?

Notice how he/she/it skipped right over that? Yet the first post tonight was an attack on me on the Pelosi thread... Hmmmm."

Think what you want Custom, being somewhat new to iboats, your the only person that might confuse me with CJY or Techno. I actually take that as a complement, there good guys. But I'm not into proving a negative.

 

[QC]

Re: Here's an argument against Welfare.

Awright. Now you pizzed this shallow little pirck off. How's that for a couple of mid 40 YO's with no work?

 

[jimonica]

Re: Here's an argument against Welfare.

Not bad QC,
I got ya beat though, I'll post a picture of mine asap.
Never posted pictures before, but I gotta learn now.8)

 

[crunch]

Re: Here's an argument against Welfare.

Think what you want Custom, being somewhat new to iboats, your the only person that might confuse me with CJY or Techno. I actually take that as a complement

I always do. I think maybe my point was won... maybe not, but maybe.

You certainly have the spin of CJY, and the frivolous mouth of Technowhatever. That's nothing to be proud of.... it's like sand in the shorts, a minor irritant.

 

[Reel Poor]

Re: Here's an argument against Welfare.

QC wrote,
"Is it jim or monica?"

Close guys. It's Jim and Veronica. And ya know what I've seen the some pictures of some of your wives and I'm feeling pretty darn good, I mean really, really good and I'll leave it at that.

I very seldom post in these type threads just because of childish statements like this one. Dude grow up.

 

[QC]

Re: Here's an argument against Welfare.

Dude fix your avatar. I miss that happy foot . . .

 

[Reel Poor]

Re: Here's an argument against Welfare.

Not bad QC,
I got ya beat though, I'll post a picture of mine asap.
Never posted pictures before, but I gotta learn now.8)

Make sure its a pic of the two of you standing in front of the computer with the iboats home page visible. Otherwise it's just a pic of anybody.

 

[Reel Poor]

Re: Here's an argument against Welfare.

Dude fix your avatar. I miss that happy foot . . .

I'm dancin on my screen. This board automatically resized my avatar to 48 X 100 and messed it up.:'(

 

[Boomyal]

Re: Here's an argument against Welfare.

jivemonica's a dude? I always thought she was a chick.

Whoever it is, he/she thinks, make that feels, like a soccer mom!

 

[QC]

Re: Here's an argument against Welfare.

BTW, that is the first pic of Mrs. QC I have posted, but he/it (I'm back to he) was pickin' on iboats wives and I broke down . . .

Yeah, jimonica, if you need help posting a pic, send it to quietcat at adelphia dot net and I'll host it/her. Good enough and we'll put her on the HOTD thread . . .

 

[QC]

Re: Here's an argument against Welfare.

I'm dancin on my screen. This board automatically resized my avatar to 100X100 and messed it up.:'(
[/color]

Red [colour=Red]X[/colour] for about a week.

 

[Boomyal]

Re: Here's an argument against Welfare.

Pony,

I read the whole article and didn't see anything about anybody being on welfare.
Although I agree with most of what you posted, there seems to be a heavy dose of stereotyping in relation to the welfare issue.

Well then, let's talk about the welfare issue. Let's talk about 2 or 3 generations where welfare is a life style, not a helping hand. Let's talk about how the more kids you pump out, the bigger the paycheck. Let's talk about all the other programs that go with welfare, like wic, food stamps, and in this State, free medical insurance.

Let's talk about what would happen if this Socialist system wasn't in place.... do you think they would starve?, or would they get off their butt and make something of themselves.

Let's talk about the feel good jimonica's of this country who perpetrated and perpetuated this system!