Iraq Study Group

PW2

Commander
Joined
Apr 21, 2004
Messages
2,719
No one wants to talk about the ISG?

I listened to Rush yesterday for a bit and the poor guy was apoplectic.

Frankly, I don't think it will work--Thinking we are going to train the Iraqi army to somehow embrace the National gov't is folly, they will stay loyal to their religious leaders, be they Sunni or Shia---

And just who trained the Insurgents?

Yet thinking that somehow more time, (as Bush seems to favor) is going to make any difference seems lunacy to me.

Does anyone really think Bush will fundamentally change direction?

I have no idea what will work, if anything will, but frankly I favor Tom Friedman's approach--Give them a date certain we're leaving and encourage the neighbors to step in get things under control--And if the really prefer a bloodbath, I don't see how we can stop them, long term.
 

Plainsman

Rear Admiral
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
4,062
Re: Iraq Study Group

What about it? President Bush may take some recommendations from it at face value, some bits of their idea's and some none at all.
 

JasonJ

Rear Admiral
Joined
Aug 20, 2001
Messages
4,163
Re: Iraq Study Group

We need to set a date, train them as best we can, and if they have not taken the lead and started caring for themselves, then they are on their own. This is not "Cut and run", this is giving them the oportunity to be a free nation and making them responsible for it. The current strategy of just doing everything for them is rediculous. We can't hold their hands forever. We shouldn't have done it in the first place, but since we have, it is time for them to step up.

If they fall apart, or collapse into civil war, thats life. That might sound bad, but at some point they have to start taking responsibility for their future. We gave them the opportunity to be free, and so far they are doing a stellar job with it. Maybe its about time for the populace to start taking up arms against these damn insurgents. Only when Iraqs own people have had enough of this crap and step up and fight for their reedom will this problem be resolved. It won't happen with us sitting there enabling them.
 

Boomyal

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Aug 16, 2003
Messages
12,072
Re: Iraq Study Group

Well for better or for worse, I feel an abandonment coming. Even Oregon's other Senator, the supposed conservative (who incidently has his nose so far up his Democrat counterpart's ***) just came out and said that we are commiting a crime by staying there.

That of course would be Gordon Smith (Rino). The receiver of his affections is Ron Wyden (Lib)
 

JB

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Mar 25, 2001
Messages
45,907
Re: Iraq Study Group

One thing we must NOT do is broadcast our strategy to the opposition.

For crying out loud, you CANNOT win a war or anything else if you notify the adversary of your plans.

The left and the media are determined to assist the enemy. . . .anything that prevents our President from succeeding.
 

QC

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
22,783
Re: Iraq Study Group

JB said:
. . . .anything that prevents our President from succeeding.

This is what makes want to scream. It's so true. Anybody else notice how things have cooled since the election? Pelosis' nice and cooperative, what a flippin' honkin' b****. Their dirty plan worked and IMHO it is almost all spin, but hey, who cares? It's not about the reality of Iraq and the MIddle East and our securtiy. It's only about politics . . .
 

rodbolt

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Sep 1, 2003
Messages
20,066
Re: Iraq Study Group

well monkey boy and his minions were warned, a lot, and then some more about what would happen with thier war plan.
they fired those that warned them and forced many others to resign in protest. but hey it dont matter, remember, may of 03 mission accomplished and the end of all combat missions was announced.
there are still some cool videos of the whole thing on the net.
for those that dont believe.
myself me and my late father,may he rest in peace, argured many many hours over this ill fated foolery.
he spent over 12 years in that reagion and I was active duty during the first gulf war.
however the only thing we could agree on is Rumsfelds plan was so ludicrous it bordered on crimminally insane.
we got exactly what we bought.
the only folks that will make out are corperations like halliburton and BP and a few others.
we went in on the cheap against all advice, loving Rumsfelds hollywood movie version and failed to secure the Iraqi borders.
but rummy and dummy were very very much forwarned.
until the US showed up Iraq had never seen a suicide bomber nor any terroist cells. when we installed saddam in the 60's he understood what those groups could do and he never allowed it.
whats funny is most the terrorists that actually attacked the US on 9/11 came from suadi arabia, 90% of the cash to fund it came from where? oh. suadi arabia.
now the 20% sunni population is getting 95% of their CASH US DOLLAR support from where? oh, suadia arabia, sunni population about 80% and way more brutal than anything saddam tried.
so why are we in the wrong country fighting the wrong war and our leaders steady telling us how good its going ?
why have we given the suads a blank pass to do anything they wish with no questions asked when the US intell says all the funds and most the terroists came from there and NOTHING from Iraq ?
 

MRS

Commander
Joined
Jul 10, 2005
Messages
2,579
Re: Iraq Study Group

For crying out loud, you CANNOT win a war or anything else if you notify the adversary of your plans.

So true but this seems thats why things will problably never change unless the ones that are making these things happen have something happen to them. But then it will be to late it is really sad as all wars are really sad but we as a race just do not seem to get it. I think as the earth grows smaller we would realize things but we do not we just have to be right even if we are wrong. I really do not hate anybody but know that some where in the world somebody hates me and I do not even know them. :'(
 

rodbolt

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Sep 1, 2003
Messages
20,066
Re: Iraq Study Group

MRS
how many Iraqis have you ever actually spoken with? how many pakistanis? how many Venezuelans? how many Isrealies?
me I have spoken to many on various peace and humanitarian things.
most have the same desire as you and me, I want to get up in the am, get me a cup of coffee and go to work and come home to my family.
in fact none I ever spoke with wanted to kill me.
thats a bush lie.

I dont agree with monky boy nor his minions anymore than I agree with idiot Mcain or most of the second most report ever paid for with tax money.
however facts are facts.
fact is our feeble attempt at regime change is getting ready to fail and fail dismally. however Bush is going to blame the Iraqis for incompetence when the incompetence started in april of 03.
the US totally failed to secure the border of Iraq. ya disagree? wish to debate that fact?
Iraq had no terror cells nor any suicide bombings in any recent history. care to debate that fact ?
by the US going in with rummys crimminally insane plan it gauranteed what we have today.
as everyone knows I have been very critical of not only the preinvasion plan but the total lack of plan for the events 3 weeks after the invasion.
the fact we could topple saddam was a given, if that was the only objective the war would have lasted 1 week, maybe 2.
however, there4 are at least 5 major tribes and about 8 sub groups that are all going to vy for power.
the borders of 99% of the middle east were actually drawn up by some woman in england at the end of WWII and she had never seen the reagion.
so the borders,while modern, failed to take into account the tribes that have lived there over 5000 years.
if ya wish to see iseal in a new light, look at some of the video taken by the isreali army in 45 and 46.
they actually pulled palistinians from their breakfast tables, tossed them in the street and said this is our land now, england gave it to us.
the videos are sickening but it does not mask the fact.
its a fact the israiles are not our friends, its a fact the sauds will do us in, the Iraqis are to poor and the iranians have a very good reason to hate us, look up the late sha that the US installed in Iran and then look up death squads and corruption.
so no this foolish "war" was not really a war at all, just a feeble attempt at regime change that went horribly wrong.
if MRS could show any credible documents that said MAYBE Iraq MAY attack ONE day I maybe able to alter my mind.
I cannot find anything.
However. we broke Iraq, now we have to fix it.
remember when rummy said we could use Iraqi oil to pay for invading them?
did it never strike you as an oxymoron?
it is Iraqi oil, we cannot force them to pump it or sell it.
that would be like canada taking over our oil fields and saying they would sellit for the cost of taking it.
but many many points I disagree with on the Iraq report.
however many I sadly do.
I totally DISAGREE with any troop withdrawel unless its TOTAL withdrawel.
however I would like to see the ADDITION of at least 250,000 more troops 350;000 if needed.
there is roughly 26 million folk in iraq, every time one of 6them dies they blame the US and we create 4 more that will die.
a war of attrition, eventually we may win, but it wont work.
monkey boy still wont admit he blew it, yet the rats are leaving the ship.
in 04 the additio0n of 250,000 troops to secure the border and aid in security and police force may have wom, now I dont think it will.
I hate to think we will have to rely on syria or Iran but its clear that on our own we can no longer complete the misssion. its far beyond a military mission now, we dont have an actual enemy on the ground to fight.
we are now fighting an ideologly while ducking a civil war.
but I agree with Bush, lets just blame the Iraqi's and leave.
its all their fault anyway.
 

jtexas

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Oct 13, 2003
Messages
8,646
Re: Iraq Study Group

what war? The war isn't in Iraq, we've already declared victory and moved on.

We are assisting a friendly government - an ally if you will. The President said we'll stay until they ask us to leave. Who exactly are we protecting? Seems like fewer Americans were killed by Iraqis back when their government was afraid of us.

What's the plan, exactly? Just keep doing what we've been doing and hope for different outcome?
 

rodbolt

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Sep 1, 2003
Messages
20,066
Re: Iraq Study Group

yep
sounds like a very very good plan. just keepon wishing behind the greenzone wall and all will be well.

maybe next year will be different if them stupid jahraqis wake up to all we gave them and just suddenly become a western democracy just like isreal and suadi arabi did.
if not we can blame them for being stupid and walk away with washed hands, just as Judas did.
 

PW2

Commander
Joined
Apr 21, 2004
Messages
2,719
Re: Iraq Study Group

JB said:
One thing we must NOT do is broadcast our strategy to the opposition.

For crying out loud, you CANNOT win a war or anything else if you notify the adversary of your plans.

The left and the media are determined to assist the enemy. . . .anything that prevents our President from succeeding.

I love it, JB. Setting up the groundwork to blame someone else for the inevitable failure of Bush's policies.

Surely at the start of this war, there were only a few of us that warned of the folly of this policy. Those that had any power at all in their voice were universally dismissed. Bush 41's own military analysis, at the time of the first gulf war, suggested that even with a force of 400 k troops, this was likely to lead to chaos.

Bush 43 has had more time than the time it took to fight WW II to show us that we were wrong...By Bush's own statements, he has given the generals in charge everything they asked for...

And now we are to believe the failure is caused by the left? Don't leave out the media! I'm sure they conspired with the left to make this fail!

Criminy. Don't you folks ever take responsibility for your own actions? And from the very group that implores individuals to take personal responsibility for their own lives!
 

alden135

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
1,770
Re: Iraq Study Group

JB said:
One thing we must NOT do is broadcast our strategy to the opposition.

For crying out loud, you CANNOT win a war or anything else if you notify the adversary of your plans.

The left and the media are determined to assist the enemy. . . .anything that prevents our President from succeeding.


FDR had it right when he censored EVERYTHING coming out of a war zone.

Bush should have done the same.
 

Tail_Gunner

Admiral
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
6,237
Re: Iraq Study Group

Have a read gentlemen, most of this is documented and verafiable.

http://www.husseinandterror.com/

Honestly i do not like Republican big business in the white house, but i cannot stomach the liberal agenda that now runs the Democratic party.

And perhap's the saddest event that one could think of was the liberal side of the Democractiic party using this war as a means of revenge for what the Repub's did to Clinton

I really dont think anyone can talk with a great deal of certainty (factual) what really happened in this war,, it was politically spun so hard and vehmous it just make's me sick to think about it.
 

Haut Medoc

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Jun 29, 2004
Messages
10,645
Re: Iraq Study Group

HMMMMMMM,& here I always thuoght that Rehubs were all about kicking people off of welfare if'n they didn't want to work......
Now its called "Cut & Run"....;)
 

18rabbit

Captain
Joined
Nov 14, 2003
Messages
3,202
Re: Iraq Study Group

How come no one is even questioning the existence of the Iraq Study Group? When did we allow the Commander in Chief to abdicate his responsibilities to a panel? Hey, every Pres needs his advisors, but not a panel to advise him on how to publish a book on how to fight a war. Shrub's advisors need to be his advisors behind closed doors. Why is Shrub even allowing his advisors to step up to the soapbox?

Clearly Shrub is trying to avoid responsibility for, well, what he is clearly responsibility for...bringing a timely conclusion to a drawn out political conflict. He obviously has no idea how to do that. He does not want to make a decision, he does not want "failure" hung on him.

It will be nice to see Shrub out of the White House, can’t wait. The guy is a disaster.
 

Plainsman

Rear Admiral
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
4,062
Re: Iraq Study Group

rodbolt said:
MRS
how many Iraqis have you ever actually spoken with? how many pakistanis? how many Venezuelans? how many Isrealies?
me I have spoken to many on various peace and humanitarian things.
most have the same desire as you and me, I want to get up in the am, get me a cup of coffee and go to work and come home to my family.
in fact none I ever spoke with wanted to kill me.
thats a bush lie.

I dont agree with monky boy nor his minions anymore than I agree with idiot Mcain or most of the second most report ever paid for with tax money.
however facts are facts.
fact is our feeble attempt at regime change is getting ready to fail and fail dismally. however Bush is going to blame the Iraqis for incompetence when the incompetence started in april of 03.
the US totally failed to secure the border of Iraq. ya disagree? wish to debate that fact?
Iraq had no terror cells nor any suicide bombings in any recent history. care to debate that fact ?
by the US going in with rummys crimminally insane plan it gauranteed what we have today.
as everyone knows I have been very critical of not only the preinvasion plan but the total lack of plan for the events 3 weeks after the invasion.
the fact we could topple saddam was a given, if that was the only objective the war would have lasted 1 week, maybe 2.
however, there4 are at least 5 major tribes and about 8 sub groups that are all going to vy for power.
the borders of 99% of the middle east were actually drawn up by some woman in england at the end of WWII and she had never seen the reagion.
so the borders,while modern, failed to take into account the tribes that have lived there over 5000 years.
if ya wish to see iseal in a new light, look at some of the video taken by the isreali army in 45 and 46.
they actually pulled palistinians from their breakfast tables, tossed them in the street and said this is our land now, england gave it to us.
the videos are sickening but it does not mask the fact.
its a fact the israiles are not our friends, its a fact the sauds will do us in, the Iraqis are to poor and the iranians have a very good reason to hate us, look up the late sha that the US installed in Iran and then look up death squads and corruption.
so no this foolish "war" was not really a war at all, just a feeble attempt at regime change that went horribly wrong.
if MRS could show any credible documents that said MAYBE Iraq MAY attack ONE day I maybe able to alter my mind.
I cannot find anything.
However. we broke Iraq, now we have to fix it.
remember when rummy said we could use Iraqi oil to pay for invading them?
did it never strike you as an oxymoron?
it is Iraqi oil, we cannot force them to pump it or sell it.
that would be like canada taking over our oil fields and saying they would sellit for the cost of taking it.
but many many points I disagree with on the Iraq report.
however many I sadly do.
I totally DISAGREE with any troop withdrawel unless its TOTAL withdrawel.
however I would like to see the ADDITION of at least 250,000 more troops 350;000 if needed.
there is roughly 26 million folk in iraq, every time one of 6them dies they blame the US and we create 4 more that will die.
a war of attrition, eventually we may win, but it wont work.
monkey boy still wont admit he blew it, yet the rats are leaving the ship.
in 04 the additio0n of 250,000 troops to secure the border and aid in security and police force may have wom, now I dont think it will.
I hate to think we will have to rely on syria or Iran but its clear that on our own we can no longer complete the misssion. its far beyond a military mission now, we dont have an actual enemy on the ground to fight.
we are now fighting an ideologly while ducking a civil war.
but I agree with Bush, lets just blame the Iraqi's and leave.
its all their fault anyway.

"RECOMMENDATION 21: If the Iraqi government does not make substantial progress toward
the achievement of milestones on national reconciliation, security, and governance, the United
States should reduce its political, military, or economic support for the Iraqi government."

Seems to be that is what the ISG is saying, not President Bush.
 

jtexas

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Oct 13, 2003
Messages
8,646
Re: Iraq Study Group

18rabbit said:
How come no one is even questioning the existence of the Iraq Study Group? When did we allow the Commander in Chief to abdicate his responsibilities to a panel? Hey, every Pres needs his advisors, but not a panel to advise him on how to publish a book on how to fight a war. Shrub's advisors need to be his advisors behind closed doors. Why is Shrub even allowing his advisors to step up to the soapbox?

Clearly Shrub is trying to avoid responsibility for, well, what he is clearly responsibility for...bringing a timely conclusion to a drawn out political conflict. He obviously has no idea how to do that. He does not want to make a decision, he does not want "failure" hung on him.

It will be nice to see Shrub out of the White House, can’t wait. The guy is a disaster.

no idea how to bring a timely conclusion to the conflict in Iraq? duh. you know it I know everybody knows it, and he knows we all know it, just like we all know that none of us really know how to do it, but we all expect somebody to do something about it, and it's the president's job. The panel gets visiblitly so we can all see that he's doing something other than pretending to have answers.

Anyway it's a congressional panel.

It's unclear what you are complaining about.
 

Plainsman

Rear Admiral
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
4,062
Re: Iraq Study Group

"RECOMMENDATION 31: Amnesty. Amnesty proposals must be far-reaching. Any successful
effort at national reconciliation must involve those in the government finding ways and means to
reconcile with former bitter enemies."

Now that's as clear as mud.

"RECOMMENDATION 40: The United States should not make an open-ended commitment to
keep large numbers of American troops deployed in Iraq."

I agree with this one.

"RECOMMENDATION 43: Military priorities in Iraq must change, with the highest priority
given to the training, equipping, advising, and support mission and to counterterrorism
operations."

I agree with this one as well.

"RECOMMENDATION 46: The new Secretary of Defense should make every effort to build
healthy civil-military relations, by creating an environment in which the senior military feel free
to offer independent advice not only to the civilian leadership in the Pentagon but also to the
President and the National Security Council, as envisioned in the Goldwater-Nichols
legislation."

I would hope that is always there.

"RECOMMENDATION 64: U.S. economic assistance should be increased to a level of $5
billion per year rather than being permitted to decline. The President needs to ask for the
necessary resources and must work hard to win the support of Congress. Capacity building and
job creation, including reliance on the Commander’s Emergency Response Program, should be
U.S. priorities. Economic assistance should be provided on a nonsectarian basis."

The left should love this one. A social program for Iraq!Funded by us (the dems could raise taxes and blame President Bush for it)
 

POINTER94

Vice Admiral
Joined
Oct 12, 2003
Messages
5,031
Re: Iraq Study Group

Sad to see how easily some would run away from responsibility and opportunity. It is not however, unexpected. Again a point was made to where the vociferous opposition is now. The NEED for immediate change no longer seems imperitive. The question as to why seems somehow pathetically transparent. Hatred is all that remains for the weak of heart and the cowards to history. The church of the liberal ideology has its parishoners kneeling and praying to their false gods of bastardized history and benevolent aristocracy. Their arrogance of sophmoric intellectual bigotry is displayed without challenge for the syncophants to repeat and for the weak to consume. It is so because they say it is so. All hurdles too high, no sacrifice worthwhile. Just the religion of like mindedness. But it is their fear of morals, values and ethics that actually binds them together. It is the belief that there are actually no differences, no right or wrong but that decreed by the current incarnate of authority. No universal paragon values that transcend time and culture. The church of fluid nothingness commands that its members be forever obedient while at the same time forever obtuse to the contridictions they preach. Politics and science are the tenants of the enlightened progressive. But their past present and future cannot be enscribed endelibly as the entropy of the system providess no point in which to ground their beliefs. Everyday is a new historical starting point for our friends on the left. And nothing has ever transpired prior to their arrival.

Realities of war are well documented. Sun Tzu outlined the roadmap for victory and it has held true for over a thousand years. By declaring ourselves superior to those realities, we stand of the precipice of not attaining our goals and like fools we cannot appreciate why. That is clearly stupidity. And blaming someone for personal gain while mortgaging the outcome of a war is folly. The key to war is deception. I am sure you liberals would love to have all plans displayed on the front page of the NYTimes, and so would they but that is a recipe for failure. Perhaps that is what is really underlying the "concern" for our troops. It used to be peace with honor, now it is failure with dignity. Wake up.
 
Top