Google wrote:

[technostingray]

Did you mean Ridicule?

I honestly didn't intend sarcasm so much as out and out riducule - jtexas

Man Quiet Copier, you really know how to hurt a guy!

 

[bassboy1]

Re: Google wrote:

There he goes again - raising his post count.|O

 

[crunch]

Re: Google wrote:

Did you mean Ridicule?

I honestly didn't intend sarcasm so much as out and out riducule - jtexas

What? Did you miss me?

 

[technostingray]

Re: Google wrote:

Did you mean Ridicule?

I honestly didn't intend sarcasm so much as out and out riducule - jtexas

What? Did you miss me?

My, my look what the cat drug in.

 

[technostingray]

Re: Google wrote:

There he goes again - raising his post count.|O

you talking to me? YOU talking to me? Are you talking to me?

 

[QC]

Re: Google wrote:

Wow. Hmmmmm. Well that was actually a C & P so I am blaming jtex, however, in his defense I did not get his permission to use the quote, although I am not clear as to iboats policy regarding usage. Anyway, thanks for noting so that I would not leave myself (or jtex) open for more riducule . . .

 

[crunch]

Re: Google wrote:

Did you mean Ridicule?

I honestly didn't intend sarcasm so much as out and out riducule - jtexas

What? Did you miss me?

My, my look what the cat drug in.

That's: My my, look what the cat drug in.

Not: My, my look what the cat drug in.

Got it?

Did you miss me?

 

[technostingray]

Re: Google wrote:

No, no but you obviously missed your English class.

 

[crunch]

Re: Google wrote:

I missed you too. (a double negative equals a positive)

I see you're still po'ed about the pink nighty.

 

[technostingray]

Re: Google wrote:

Well, it just that I had a hard time explainging to your wife what happend to it.

 

[bassboy1]

Re: Google wrote:

 

[crunch]

Re: Google wrote:

Well, it just that I had a hard time explainging to your wife what happend to it.

Hey, all you have to do next time is ask, she's a very generous person.8)

 

[jtexas]

Re: Google wrote:

by attributing the quote to its author I don't think you'd have any problems anyway my having seen it over and over again without complaining is pretty much tacit approval.

 

[technostingray]

Re: Google wrote:

Tacit approval? You mean like a precedent? :^:^:^
Repetition is the key to humor, however.

 

[crunch]

Re: Google wrote:

And you beat that Precedent to death... Precedent Bush, Vice Precedent Cheny, Precedent of The Rotary Club...

Get a new Joke, you know... something new.

How about "FILL"... I can think of all kindsa jokes about "FILL"

 

[Dunaruna]

Re: Google wrote:

[colour=blue]Woah! Back it up a bit fella's -

What's this about a pink nightie?

 

[Kiwi Phil]

Re: Google wrote:

I reckon I really know who Techno is......and the pink nightie fits-a-treat.
Cheers
Phillip

 

[technostingray]

Re: Google wrote:

[colour=blue]Woah! Back it up a bit fella's -

What's this about a pink nightie?

Well, er uh, I uh, uh uh, crunch came in and saw his wife naked and she handed me the nighty and said I just wanted to try it on and crunch grab it away from me and said that's mine. As to how I came to be in the same room with crunches naked wife, I am taking the 750 Milliliter. Singel Malt of course.

And a Merry Christmas to you too Phil. If what you know about techno was magnified a million times and rolled down an ants rectum it would sound like a Beebee in a box car. I am taking an extra long shower today in your honor, Phil. How is your youngest doing? I guess the apple doesn't fall far from the tree, eh.

 

[Dunaruna]

Re: Google wrote:

[colour=blue]Ray, you should be on stage :} , I haven't laughed so much in a long time. 8)

 

[Dunaruna]

Re: Google wrote:

[colour=blue]Speaking of single malt, my son recieved a very nice bottle of glenfiddich for his 21st birthday - wonder if he will share it with his dear old dad?