Nothing I've tried works well for my '94 3/4 ton 454 Suburban. The brakes are atrocious and only last 17.5k miles. Some day I will try ceramics. I've heard they don't last any longer but they stop much better.
Boom, That's a large vehicle with too minimal of brakes. I know you live in hilly country as do I and the way you use the brakes makes a huge diference. I had the same situation and solved it by learning to be easier on the brake pedal. I have a mechanic that does my brakes tho I don't know what brand he uses but I can tell you at 60k on these brakes I still have plenty of brake pad and shoe left, but I am having them changed next year anyroad. Chief Chief
On my expedition, I use only ceramics. I used to use the Semi-metalic but the dust was so bad that I couldn't stand it. The ceramics took that away. I replacce the whole front every other year. Thats about all I have to feed that beast other than gas and oil.
Chief, you have a 3/4 ton as well? If so, ask your mechanic what he used and let me know. Heck, I get 27k miles on my grossly overloaded 1/2 ton E-150 brake pads and that is with the rear shoes hardly doing anything. I only replaced the rears, for the first time, at 218K miles.
There is no one easier on the brake pedal than Moi. I got the 'burb with 17k mi on it, in early '96. At 17.5 k the brakes started pulling a little when I stopped. I had the brakes checked and the pads were down to business card thin, so they replaced thems. Undissipated heat was causing the pulling due to the pads thinness.
17K later (35k miles) they started pulling slightly again. Checked the pads, they were business card thin. I replaced them with Napa's best metallic and all was well. I now only have 44K on the old 'burb so I should be good for another 8K. At 9-10 mpg, you can imagine it is not my first choice to hop into to go to the local grocery store, so it should take me a while to get there.
I'll see if I chase him down and find out. I'm not sure he used any special pads but when I find out I'll let you know. I do have a 3/4 if that makes a dif. Chief
Frankly I have not had any issues with stopping distance or fade. Performance wise I did not notice any difference. No squeal either.
I am guessing I get 40K miles per set. Mine wear funny though so I don't that thsi is a relevant number..
What year, Chief? I think that 2000 or later Chev went to a dual piston front caliper. This let them use a larger brake pad which they said they could not use with the single piston caliper. Hence the brake pads were too small, generated too much heat and wore out very quickly. (so they said)
Ya but roger, IMHO Ford brakes were always better than the notorious backward, inept General Motors. How they could underbrake their trucks and SUV's for so many years and get away with it?...come to think of it, maybe they didn't. During the earlier years, Ford outsold Chebby by a factor of ? many. My '94 is a joke. I can't even flash the headlights with the turn indicator lever. I could do that in my 1962 Volkswagen and I could certainly do that in my wife's '88 Grand Marquis.
Plain and simple, chevys are turds!![]()
Nothing I've tried works well for my '94 3/4 ton 454 Suburban. The brakes are atrocious and only last 17.5k miles. Some day I will try ceramics. I've heard they don't last any longer but they stop much better.