Lawsuit!

SS MAYFLOAT

Admiral
Joined
May 17, 2001
Messages
6,372
Re: Lawsuit!

Would it be illegal to act like a minor (like the police did) and lure a preditor to your house?______


I know it would be illegal to drag his arse inside your house and violate him. But it would just might bring some satisfaction..............Whats the fine for assult btw? Of course just like the preditor, you gotta get caught first.

Real glad my wife are empty nesters now and don't worry so much about them,,,,,,but we do the grandkids.
 

RubberFrog

Rear Admiral
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Messages
4,268
Re: Lawsuit!

Oh I'm not excusing their behavior... They weren't in a child prone area of the internet, not talking to children or about children.

You start off saying you're not making an excuse, and then jump right into making an excuse!

I am going to stick with what I said earlier, I think they made a stupid choice.

You think having sex with a minor is simply a "stupid choice?" WTF?!

... they must be reoffenders right? Nope, they aren't.

WTF`are you talking about? Many of these guys are reoffenders.

Most of them had not done a bad thing in their life...

Yep, they were all at church until they got the idea to have sex with a child.

You are scaring me.
 

Haut Medoc

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Jun 29, 2004
Messages
10,645
Re: Lawsuit!

You start off saying you're not making an excuse, and then jump right into making an excuse!



You think having sex with a minor is simply a "stupid choice?" WTF?!



WTF`are you talking about? Many of these guys are reoffenders.



Yep, they were all at church until they got the idea to have sex with a child.

You are scaring me.
Yeah, he's got me wondering, too.....
Methinks thou dost protesteth too much!.......;):eek::)
 

Kalifornyakid

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Jan 14, 2007
Messages
122
Re: Lawsuit!

The reason they are not going to court, waterinthefuel, is because of a technicality. If I remember right, it had to do with the operation not being conducted by the police, so no "custody of evidence" or some crap like that. They shoulda just "accidently" shot them after initialy confronting them.
 

PW2

Commander
Joined
Apr 21, 2004
Messages
2,719
Re: Lawsuit!

FTR, many of these creeps have been prosecuted, according to Hansen, at least.

What makes this particular case different from the others was that apparently they went to the home of one of the adult chatters and arrested them there, as opposed to letting them go the intended victim's house, or meet at some agreed location.

I think that is crossing the line as far as NBC goes, if those facts are true. It's one thing to spout off in some internet chatroom, it is a far different thing to act on those chats, IMO.
 

POINTER94

Vice Admiral
Joined
Oct 12, 2003
Messages
5,031
Re: Lawsuit!

I think it is just ducky when pukes like this decide to adminster their own self punishment.

I guess he found himself guilty. I kind of like the sentance.

I have hundreds or more hours on this computer and never once thought of, dabbled in, felt strongly towards, considered, much less acted upon going somewhere in cyberspace to meet little children to molest.

When I was down, depressed, beaten up emotionally, I went to a site to talk about boats. Silly me, I could have been stalking children in the name of free speech.
 

WillyBWright

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Dec 29, 2003
Messages
8,200
Re: Lawsuit!

By participating in this sting operation in such a intimate manner, I feel that NBC is on a slippery slope. Reporting the news is one thing. Creating a situation is manufacturing news to report. Is NBC a bystander reporting a sting operation, or a participant in the sting operation? I think they've advanced to the participant level and I don't think that's their place.

The "sparkle" of the media lights might very well be influencing the operation and I think that this case illustrates that. Would law enforcement have gone to the assistant DA's home without NBC's influence? Knowing that an assistant DA was a potential sting collar, did NBC abuse it's influence to encourage law enforcement to depart from their normal procedures and confront the man in his own home after not showing up at the sting location? I think these are the questions that will separate Reporting from Manufacturing and that the sister has a valid complaint. She at least has substantial cause for bringing the subject to litigation.

Now I don't think that the neighboring county's decision not to prosecute the other perps is appropriate, but this situation influenced that decision without question. So in this instance, NBC directly influenced the situation in a negative way and that's unfortunate. I think it's time for NBC to step away and let law enforcement do their job unfettered and uninfluenced.
 

RubberFrog

Rear Admiral
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Messages
4,268
Re: Lawsuit!

I sick peice of shiite down, countless more to go. Stop boohooing and start celebrating!
 

12Footer

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Mar 25, 2001
Messages
8,217
Re: Lawsuit!

They lost a hero. They are in mourning. Speaks for itself.
 

Tail_Gunner

Admiral
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
6,237
Re: Lawsuit!

By participating in this sting operation in such a intimate manner, I feel that NBC is on a slippery slope. Reporting the news is one thing. Creating a situation is manufacturing news to report. Is NBC a bystander reporting a sting operation, or a participant in the sting operation? I think they've advanced to the participant level and I don't think that's their place.

The "sparkle" of the media lights might very well be influencing the operation and I think that this case illustrates that. Would law enforcement have gone to the assistant DA's home without NBC's influence? Knowing that an assistant DA was a potential sting collar, did NBC abuse it's influence to encourage law enforcement to depart from their normal procedures and confront the man in his own home after not showing up at the sting location? I think these are the questions that will separate Reporting from Manufacturing and that the sister has a valid complaint. She at least has substantial cause for bringing the subject to litigation.

Now I don't think that the neighboring county's decision not to prosecute the other perps is appropriate, but this situation influenced that decision without question. So in this instance, NBC directly influenced the situation in a negative way and that's unfortunate. I think it's time for NBC to step away and let law enforcement do their job unfettered and uninfluenced.


Well intamacy is a big word, what i do understand is that a old soul could have violated a new soul.......with no regard to the child's dream's or future. Right wrong or indifferent he could have marked a young women's attitude toward's love in a very basterdized way, perhap's ruining any chance for a healthly relationship for her and her partner in life.

Women while crazy as they are, are the future of mankind, you know all of those crazy old value's.....love, compassion and understanding.

Year's ago i watched a movie where a actor read some line's that forever changed my life, it's been long enough i cant remeber the exact line but it went a bit like this........ Do the needs of one out weigh the need's of the many.......you be the judge
For a grown man to corrupt a young women's mind and all of the possible ramification's is a assult on humanity, so his death is of little worry to me, but my christian side scream's may god have mercy on his soul.

With that said, as a man and a father of two beautiful girl's i wish he would have went to prison and had bubba and his brother's have there way with him until he decieded to end it by himself.......he was spared that humiliation. But what the hell it was just sex right..:mad:
 

WillyBWright

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Dec 29, 2003
Messages
8,200
Re: Lawsuit!

You're missing my point entirely. In no way am I trying to excuse any illicit activity here. I'm only questioning NBC's ongoing participation in this operation. They've crossed the line and are no longer reporting the news, but participating in creating it for ratings-sake, and now several prosecutions will not take place because of it. This one singled-out case has tainted the process and Two Dozen perps go free as a direct result. So do the needs of this one (NBC) outweigh the needs of the many that those that go free might victimize? Or do the needs of the many that watch the program outweight the needs of the few that might now be victimized? (That was Adm. Kirk & Capt. Spock, TG. ;))

"And the district attorney is refusing to prosecute any of the [24] men. He says many of the cases were tainted by the involvement of amateurs."
 

WillyBWright

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Dec 29, 2003
Messages
8,200
Re: Lawsuit!

Here is an interview Bill O'Reilly had with with the attorney representing the sister on Fox...

O'REILLY: With us now is attorney Bruce Baron, who's representing Patricia Conradt in the lawsuit. All right, let's walk through this. You're not going to state or claim that the police are illegal — doing something wrong when they use Internet sting methods to identify predators?

BRUCE BARON, CLIENT SUING NBC: Oh no. To the contrary. We would encourage it. I mean, police and law enforcement, they're trained to do these things. We want them to. In no way, Bill, do I want you or the public to think that I or Patricia Conradt are advocating on the behalf of child pornographers.

O'REILLY: OK. So you're okay with the cops posing as young boys or girls…

BARON: Absolutely.

O'REILLY: ...on the other end of the Net, to try to identify adults who want to molest them.

BARON: Absolutely.

O'REILLY: Now in this case, NBC News, as part of their "Dateline" series, contracts out with a group called Perverted Justice, which does just that. Perverted Justice is civilians.

BARON: Right.

O'REILLY: They're based in Portland, Oregon.

BARON: Right.

O'REILLY: However, they do, when they find predators online or someone they think, alert the authorities in the areas. And this was in Texas. And they alerted the authorities correct?

BARON: Correct. But you know what it is, Bill? The reality of it is, police and law enforcement should never subcontract police work. Police are trained to handle these situations, so they don't get to the unfortunate situation like it got to with him.

O'REILLY: OK, but what if I find somebody on the Internet who's a predator, say I'm a parent and my child is being accosted, I'm going to call the police.

BARON: And you should.

O'REILLY: Well, what…

BARON: But you shouldn't call NBC.

O'REILLY: But why would that be different by NBC and Perverted Justice doing the same thing? They've identified people they believe are predators. Then they call the police.

BARON: Here's the problem, Bill. Conradt, who was a career prosecutor, afforded his defendants that he prosecuted in his career a presumption of innocence and a presumption of fair trial. When he opened up the window and saw Chris Hanson on his lawn.

O'REILLY: The NBC reporter?

BARON: That's correct. He knew he wasn't there to visit his grandmother. His presumption of innocence was thrown out the window. And that's not right. NBC has no right to declare — become the judge, the jury, and sentence him to death.

O'REILLY: All right. So you're saying that just the exposition and the arrest of Mr. Conradt was a conviction?

BARON: Not the arrest. Not the arrest. But...

O'REILLY: Because the cops were there with Hanson.

BARON: Well, as it turns out, the arrest of the other 24 individuals…

O'REILLY: Were thrown out.

BARON: …were thrown out. Isn't that ironic?

O'REILLY: That's the first time that's happened. Clearly, this prosecutor didn't want any part of this case.

BARON: It's going to happen time and time again because you have amateurs getting involved in police work.

O'REILLY: OK. Now Mr. Conradt was an educated man. As you said, he was a career prosecutor. And he made a decision to take his own life, because he didn't want to suffer the humiliation that was facing him. Am I correct there?

BARON: Well, we don't know of course what was in his mind, but certainly he should.

O'REILLY: Oh, there is no other motivation. I mean, if he were innocent, he could beat the rap, he could hire you. He could hire another lawyer to beat it. But it looks to any rational person…

BARON: Well, Bill, if I may.

O'REILLY: Sure, go ahead.

BARON: I think many things will come out shortly during the discovery phase of the impending lawsuit that might shed a different light, not only on the allegations pre-death of Bill Conradt, but the allegations and the conduct of NBC and their officials during this whole thing.

O'REILLY: And we'll look forward — look, we don't have any use for NBC News. You know that. We think that this is an out of control outfit over there. And Americans are bailing out of it in droves. So I'm not going to argue for them.
But I will say this. It looks to me like Louis Conradt said, I don't want to be humiliated in this way and I'm going to kill myself. So I think you might have a little bit of trouble saying to a courtroom this man isn't responsible for his actions.

BARON: Well, no. To the contrary. This is certainly a consequence of what was intended. I mean, the intent here by no means by Chris Hanson and his cohorts are not to stop child predators. No. They're to boost ratings and inflame situations. In fact, they can't even inflame the situation themselves. They need a third party because then they won't be held to an ethical standard of journalism. So that just shows in and of itself.

O'REILLY: All right, so you're going to go in and say this whole deal was malicious?

BARON: No question about it.

O'REILLY: OK. And the malice.

BARON: In fact, keep in mind, I don't know how many times before Chris Hanson was kind enough to make house calls, but in this particular case he made a house call.

O'REILLY: Well, this was a big guy.

BARON: Well, yes, because my guy never went to the house.

O'REILLY: No, this was a big guy. And as you said, they want to get that thing. But if NBC can prove that this guy did try to stalk a 13-year-old boy, then you got another problem.

BARON: No, you don't. You know why? Because even at worst case he did, no one would ever give him the death sentence. Saddam Hussein was given due process. Bill Conradt should be given nothing less.

OMG, I just quoted Bill O'Reilly. Gimme a bucket of soap! I gotta wash my mouth out. :eek: ;)
 

rwise

Captain
Joined
Jul 5, 2001
Messages
3,205
Re: Lawsuit!

I disagree with entrapment HOWEVER I disagree with child molestation more!
First offense - cut off there dangley stuff!
Second offense - HANG them!

I do not go to those kind of chat rooms, never needed to, there are girls here of age ready and willing.

I don't even send dirty jokes on my cell phone anymore as I have heard it CAN be considered offensive if you happen to send it to NOT the person you intended! I have received text messages etc some would have been offended by, myself I play along and respond, can get fun from there or you never here from them again :D but then I play along with prank callers. Oh yes, a little to the left, right there oh yes yes click LOL:D love to prank the prankster (Warning: if you do this they will stop calling :( )
 

Kenneth Brown

Captain
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Messages
3,481
Re: Lawsuit!

I've been employed by your tax dollars for over 13 years as law enforcement and corrections. Bubba and Billy Ray will NOT make these sorry bassturds pay when he hits the prison. It don't work that way anymore. The feds are so pent up on protecting these pos's that its impossible. Because of my position I must say that professionally I agree. I am required to uphold the law for all individuals regardless of my opinion of them. Now should it happen to my daughters all bets are off. All that firearm training/defensive tactics will come in realllllll handy. Let the show keep running. If the biatches kill thereseleves afterwards all to the better.
 

SpinnerBait_Nut

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Aug 25, 2002
Messages
17,651
Re: Lawsuit!

It's on now, called "Predator Raw" the unseen tapes.
Getting ready to show an actor.:eek:
And yes, he reads the chat transcript to the guys.
 
Top