Simple "work horse" fish finder?

thehemi

Seaman Apprentice
Joined
Jun 14, 2010
Messages
42
I'm a new boater and in need of a fish finder. Well, actually
just a depth finder, but I'm reading that a fish finder is going
to be the better option due to a better view of the bottom.

Are there any simple "work horse" models that I can check out?
I don't think we need color. Our only concern is how deep the
water is where we are and, hopefully, slightly in front of us.
(I'm assuming there's were the "fish finder" is going to help?)

Thanks for suggestions!
 

marcortez

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Mar 21, 2010
Messages
230
Re: Simple "work horse" fish finder?

If you have no need to mark and locate fish, mark and locate underwater structure (channels, dropoffs, reefs, high spots, marine growth, ect) a simple digital depth finder will do.
It gives you a read out of the depth under the boat..end of story.

If you want to follow the contours of the seabed (lakebed, riverbed) with a "picture" of those bottom contours displayed on a LCD screen, then a more elaborate unit will be required.

Elaborate can take the form of a $99 Hummingbird to a multi thousand dollar Furuno unit.

The differences are basically power output and what is displayed on the screen and at what resolution. In this case, pixels are what makes the unit come to life and "draw" objects under the beam of the transducer.

This "beam" is actually a pulse of sound that goes from the transducer to the bottom of the seabed and back to the transducer and "read" by the software, which then interprets these signals and calculates the depth, with the time it takes to bounce back from the bottom.

These beams of sound emit in, what is called a "cone".....because as the pulse comes out of the transducer, on it's way to the seabed, it forms a cone shaped beam.
The deeper the seabed, the larger the cone becomes, and hence, the greater area it will "read"

So if you happen to be running in shallow water (10' or so) the bottom area covered is going to be very small.

By just idling along, with the machine on and set to the correct depth your in, what you see on the screen is immediately below the transducer face.(which is normally mounted towards the rear of the boat)
By the time you recognize this and put the boat in neutral, that area you first saw on the screen is well behind the boat.

Spend sometime looking at the various models and your price maximum.
Google will truly be your friend here.
There are literally millions of articles and how to's on the internet.

Power is a primary concern for a quality unit.
The more power, the deeper the unit will display the bottom clearly and discriminate between objects.

Many fish finders list their power as "peak to peak"....a more reliable power measurement is called "RMS" and any potential buyer of a quality FF should look for that, rather than "peak to peak"

As an example, Furuno lists their least expensive ($300 clams) model as 300 watts RMS power.
On the other end of the quality spectrum, a entry Hummingbird could be one third of that power rating.....and at one third the price.

For your use, a less expensive fish finder should fill the bill just fine. If no fishing or bottom contours are required, a simple digital unit should do you ok.

If and when you want more power, more resolution and advanced software, then the Furuno units are the choice of serious offshore anglers, commercial fishermen and commercial shipping.
 

thehemi

Seaman Apprentice
Joined
Jun 14, 2010
Messages
42
Re: Simple "work horse" fish finder?

Excellent, thank you very much for your input!
 

robert graham

Admiral
Joined
Apr 16, 2009
Messages
6,908
Re: Simple "work horse" fish finder?

I bought a new Lowrance X50 Dual Search Sonar from Overton's for $119, works fine for just a basic unit. All just depends on what you need.
 

thehemi

Seaman Apprentice
Joined
Jun 14, 2010
Messages
42
Re: Simple "work horse" fish finder?

I just need one to help make sure I don't run aground. :)
I don't care about the bottom's texture or where fish are.

Academy has an Eagle Cuda 300 and Garmin Fish Finder 140.
Searching around for reviews, it seems the 140 isn't too bad.

I see that some have GPS functions. That would be fun, but
I probably don't need to double or triple my budget to include
it at this point. Maybe in a future upgrade (on a larger boat).
 

Rocky_Road

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
Oct 8, 2008
Messages
1,798
Re: Simple "work horse" fish finder?

I use the EAGLE CUDA 168.

Highly visible in the brightest sunlight...good depth reading...and shows you the fish. It has a low depth alarm, which can be user adjusted. It also shows you the water temperature, for whatever that is worth!

I mounted the transducer using their optional suction cup (didn't want to drill the transom, and wanted to be able to move it to my other boat), and it has remained exactly where I placed it for 3 seasons now...and works as advertised even at WOT.

Happy boating!
 

robert graham

Admiral
Joined
Apr 16, 2009
Messages
6,908
Re: Simple "work horse" fish finder?

The Lowrance X50 is all you need to read the depth of the water and for $120 it's hard to beat, but there's lots of these on the market in Overton's and Cabela's, read up on them and pick the one that suits you. Good Luck!
 

dingbat

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Nov 20, 2001
Messages
16,313
Re: Simple "work horse" fish finder?

As an example, Furuno lists their least expensive ($300 clams) model as 300 watts RMS power.
What unit is that? :confused: You would be hard pressed to find a Furuno serial interface cable for that price.

If your talking about the LS-4100 that model has been out of production for over 5 years now. It was over $700, plus transducer, when in production.

BTW: If you can still find a LS 4100, its still better than 95% of the recreational units on the market.
 

zibzer

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Apr 28, 2007
Messages
114
Re: Simple "work horse" fish finder?

I hear a few votes on the Eagle Cuda. IMHO stay far away from those units. I owned one and was less than impressed everytime i turned it on. I owned a PirahnaMax by Humminbird and it was a fair unit at a rock bottom price. I also owned a Humminbird 535 and it was an excellent unit and I bought it very cheap. I Upgraded this unit with a speed sensor. And eventually upgraded it to a Humminbird 585 unit w/GPS which I very much like.

I would suggest a Humminbird 535 or 550. They sell for about 50 Bucks more than the cheaper Eagle units and are very much upgradeable. the 500 series units have highly visible screens and all the 500 series units use the same transducer, the same mount, and the same speed wheel, and the same GPS (although only some allow this option) which makes it great for long term if you ever want to upgrade in the future. Just my 2 Cents
 

whofan

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Feb 17, 2003
Messages
296
Re: Simple "work horse" fish finder?

I hear a few votes on the Eagle Cuda. IMHO stay far away from those units. I owned one and was less than impressed everytime i turned it on. I owned a PirahnaMax by Humminbird and it was a fair unit at a rock bottom price. I also owned a Humminbird 535 and it was an excellent unit and I bought it very cheap. I Upgraded this unit with a speed sensor. And eventually upgraded it to a Humminbird 585 unit w/GPS which I very much like.

I would suggest a Humminbird 535 or 550. They sell for about 50 Bucks more than the cheaper Eagle units and are very much upgradeable. the 500 series units have highly visible screens and all the 500 series units use the same transducer, the same mount, and the same speed wheel, and the same GPS (although only some allow this option) which makes it great for long term if you ever want to upgrade in the future. Just my 2 Cents

+1 I concure with the Humminbird 500 series. Once opon a time Lowrance was the king in the late 1990`s their x series was great. Lowrance is still living high on their great graphs of yesteryear.
For a bare bones graph I would go with a Humminbird.
I personaly have a Vexilar EdgeII, Expensive but great.
 

Boss Hawg

Lieutenant
Joined
Apr 9, 2009
Messages
1,433
Re: Simple "work horse" fish finder?

I just need one to help make sure I don't run aground. :)
I don't care about the bottom's texture or where fish are.

Academy has an Eagle Cuda 300 and Garmin Fish Finder 140.
Searching around for reviews, it seems the 140 isn't too bad.

I see that some have GPS functions. That would be fun, but
I probably don't need to double or triple my budget to include
it at this point. Maybe in a future upgrade (on a larger boat).

Both are OK starter units-
Of those two I'd go with Garmin - JMO :cool:
 
Top