Re: Good brands of S/S props?
Stevens, maybe I should not have said, "Bottom of barrel"....There have been many tests done on SS props by many magazines, companies, other independants...<br />As you know, I test as an independant.<br />I have tested countless Ballistics in 3, 3XL and 4 blade, and here's what I can tell you based on "my" data...the 3 blade is a hard pulling prop for the pitch it is claimed to be, but at the same RPM as just about any other SS prop, it is slower. The Ballistic tends to blow-out at lower positive trim levels than most, indicating inefficient cup. It does not have the bow-lifting capabilities of most due to the tip design. The Ballistic is a very thin, tappered blade prop that would appear to perform flawlessly, but testing data proves other-wise.<br />I've tested about 60 different SS props with just myself in the boat and have kept loads and conditions during testing as close as possible.<br />The std 3-blade is the slowest prop I have tested in SS. The 3-blade, XL is in the lower 3rd of the pack, even when lifting engine to max heigth allowed by that prop. The XL blows out way before a std Turbo, stiletto, OMC Raker, Mazco, Rapture, OMC SST II, Michigan match SS, Merc Laser II, Merc Tempest, Merc mirage and vengence. Solas Has one that will blow-out sooner, but has better mid-range and top-end.<br />The Ballistic blows out quicker than a std OMC aluminum as well, but provides about the same top-end.<br />As you know, Attwood labeled the Ballistic and eventually sold it to Michigan. I've tested both and there doesn't appear to be any changes by michigan.<br />The one place a ballistic works well is their 4-blade on an outboard at very high engine heights...the 4-blade has a bit different blade shape and does act different, but to get the speed, it has to be very high, and it is fast...close to the top. It will run real close to a mazco when set-up properly, but doesn't have the hole-shot.