walleyehed
Admiral
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2003
- Messages
- 6,767
Re: DF115 prop issue beyond me...Update...
Test results: (all tests were with 3 adults on board)<br />13-3/4X15 alum-5900RPM, 24.9MPH=23% slip<br />13-5/8X15 SS -5850RPM, 26.2MPH=18% slip<br />13-1/2X15 alum-6050RPM, 26.3MPH=20.3% slip<br />13-1/2X13 alum-6250RPM, 22.9MPH=23% slip<br />14X17 alum-5000RPM, 24.2MPH=22% slip<br /><br />I didn't think to take a 13-1/2X17 to test against the 14"., but the numbers show very clearly that, #1. SS is more efficient. #2. Diameter means nothing unless you are raising the engine to get max potential-again, blade design is more important the size, infact, the 14X17 was one of the most inefficient props we tried. If we would have lifted the engine 2 holes, that may prove different.<br />We chose the 13-1/2X15 for the reason it shows a bit more speed although at 6000+ RPM, when he loads the wife, his 4 kids (grown adults) and their spouses, he's got what he needs, and this is generally how he loads the boat.
Test results: (all tests were with 3 adults on board)<br />13-3/4X15 alum-5900RPM, 24.9MPH=23% slip<br />13-5/8X15 SS -5850RPM, 26.2MPH=18% slip<br />13-1/2X15 alum-6050RPM, 26.3MPH=20.3% slip<br />13-1/2X13 alum-6250RPM, 22.9MPH=23% slip<br />14X17 alum-5000RPM, 24.2MPH=22% slip<br /><br />I didn't think to take a 13-1/2X17 to test against the 14"., but the numbers show very clearly that, #1. SS is more efficient. #2. Diameter means nothing unless you are raising the engine to get max potential-again, blade design is more important the size, infact, the 14X17 was one of the most inefficient props we tried. If we would have lifted the engine 2 holes, that may prove different.<br />We chose the 13-1/2X15 for the reason it shows a bit more speed although at 6000+ RPM, when he loads the wife, his 4 kids (grown adults) and their spouses, he's got what he needs, and this is generally how he loads the boat.