Indeed.
First camera was a home brew pinhole box camera using 126 film. 126 film in and of itself was not all that bad.
Then came the cheapo 110 cameras that really stepped backwards in quality, along with Kodak's Disc system.
Polariods always had their place with me - mostly in taking photos of test equipment CRT screens when performing proof-of-performance testing. Mom sure loved hers though, and there are even quite a few left that survive.
Dad had an inexpensive Japanese 35mm camera from the early 60s that he, then I used extensively. I've still got his old prints and color slides.
My brother bought Dad a Kodak instant camera back in the 80s, and then Polaroid sued Kodak, with the end result being film was no longer available for it.
As an adult, I was finally able to afford a decent SLR, and I still have all the negatives and prints from it. I've also scanned in the negatives.
Switching to a DSLR in the mid-2000s, I never looked back.
The thing I've noticed is that I no longer shoot as well as I used to. Not that I can't make decent looking photos - quite the opposite. What I mean is that with film, I shot to make every click of the shutter release count. I composed the shot in the viewfinder. Now I can just click away and take 20 images of the subject, and then correct for whatever flaw might exist with photo editing software.
The hard thing to do is to train myself to delete the shots that aren't needed.
As for archiving those digital shots, I keep them on a fault-tolerant RAID and also dump that off to optical medium yearly. I started with CD-R, went to DVD+/-R and now have them on Blu-Ray M-Disc. The ones I really don't want to lose are in cloud storage. I figure I'm doing all I can to keep bit rot at bay. Having a possible 1000-year archival storage format goes a long way to making this happen.