1953 Wagemaker Wolverine

Chris in Utah

Seaman
Joined
Sep 25, 2019
Messages
57
Late last summer we bought our first boat, and not being one to do anything the easy way, it is a 1953 Wagemaker Wolverine 16' wooden runabout. It had been in storage for over a decade, and needs several repairs, but it was sea worthy enough for a few trips on the inland lakes and reservoirs of Utah before the end of the season.

I’m hoping to figure out how to add photos to this post and then detail some of the work I have done so far. Let’s see if I can sort out photos here.
full.jpg

Ok... looks like I can't upload directly from my computer, but I can via URL, so I'll proceed via that route with more photos/details!

Chris
 

sphelps

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
11,475
Welcome Chris ! Glad you started a thread !
Was yours listed on the title as a 53 or did you figure it out somehow else ..
I haven’t pinned down the exact year mine is yet ...
All I know is it’s a Super Deluxe model like yours ..
 

Chris in Utah

Seaman
Joined
Sep 25, 2019
Messages
57
Welcome Chris ! Glad you started a thread !
Was yours listed on the title as a 53 or did you figure it out somehow else ..
I haven’t pinned down the exact year mine is yet ...
All I know is it’s a Super Deluxe model like yours ..

Thanks Sam. I was going to place a link to your restoration here if you don't mind. You provide a great road map with yours and all the input from the group you received.

Mine was titled as a 1953, but the manufacture's ID plate is long gone. The markings I've found on it are "W6-740" stamped up forward on the inside stem, with “16 WAGE” stenciled in black nearby and "740" stamped on the transom. I'm guessing 740 is a production/hull number. It looks like a No. 6 -16 Super Deluxe in the period advertisements.
Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0233.jpg Views:	1 Size:	569.0 KB ID:	10838324Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0235.jpg Views:	1 Size:	270.5 KB ID:	10838325
Click image for larger version  Name:	5D226072-ADC4-46AE-9692-F95813D25D42-2473-000001ED7E893FAD.jpg Views:	1 Size:	243.1 KB ID:	10838326
 
Last edited:

Chris in Utah

Seaman
Joined
Sep 25, 2019
Messages
57
Hey , what hp motor are you running ?

So it came with a 1987 Mercury 70hp 3 cylinder two stroke. It's a Long Shaft, motor, weighing in at 280 lbs (with power trim). After rebuilding the carburetors and fuel pump it runs great, but it makes the boat sit stern heavy and a bit over powered for this new skipper. (The boat only weighs 370 lbs per the spec sheet above... so it's exciting, but too much weight for the transom I think.)
Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0185.jpg Views:	1 Size:	405.3 KB ID:	10838330
So I'm having a period motor rebuilt for it. 1959 Mercury Mark 55. Here's a link to the rebuild project on Johns Old Mercury site:
http://johnsoldmercurysite.com/phpBB...p?f=10&t=18824

It will look something like this when I'm done:
Click image for larger version  Name:	7a57f813322fad774046f6b05cc95acc.jpg Views:	1 Size:	43.6 KB ID:	10838331
Make about 50 HP, but only weigh 125 lbs.
 
Last edited:

Chris in Utah

Seaman
Joined
Sep 25, 2019
Messages
57
I've been working over the winter months to make repairs. Here's a quick YouTube video of removing a section of rub rail:
 
Last edited:

sphelps

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
11,475
Chris , one tip for getting the old filler out of the screws is compressed air ... Once you dig down to expose the top of the screw and loosen a bit . Hit it with the air and most times it will pop out the rest of the way ...
I have an old brochure that I will take a picture of that looks more like yours ..
‘The one you have posted doesn’t have the cockpit seating so thinking you have a different model ..
‘Nice score on the Merc ! I’ll have to join that group so I can check out the progress ...
 

sphelps

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
11,475
I think yours and mine are the one with the pin pointing at it . The pictured is a 14 ' with 2 seats .. The 16'ers had the extra bench seat in the back .. Its just not show is what I'm guessing..
 

Ned L

Commander
Joined
Sep 17, 2008
Messages
2,268
Very nice! ........ Smart move changing to a smaller and lighter engine.
 

Chris in Utah

Seaman
Joined
Sep 25, 2019
Messages
57
Chris , one tip for getting the old filler out of the screws is compressed air ... Once you dig down to expose the top of the screw and loosen a bit . Hit it with the air and most times it will pop out the rest of the way ...
I have an old brochure that I will take a picture of that looks more like yours ..
‘The one you have posted doesn’t have the cockpit seating so thinking you have a different model ..
‘Nice score on the Merc ! I’ll have to join that group so I can check out the progress ...

I'll have to try the compressed air method... sounds like it would speed things up.
Thanks for sharing the brochure. Great info there! I think you are right about this being a No.5 Super Deluxe Molded Plywood in the 16ft flavor... I guess I got hung up on the "W6-740" stamped on mine. W6 doesn't necessarily = No.6 model. Plus the No.6 line wasn't offered until 1954 and the foredeck on the No.6 was one piece plywood finished to look like calked planking, where mine is actual planking.
full.jpg


full.jpg
 

Chris in Utah

Seaman
Joined
Sep 25, 2019
Messages
57
‘Nice score on the Merc ! I’ll have to join that group so I can check out the progress ...
Very nice! ........ Smart move changing to a smaller and lighter engine.

Sam, I forgot JohnsOldMercurySite is behind a pay wall. Ned, I'm kind of excited about the motor... it will look right and still make good power, even excellent power for the weight. I really like the look of the 1950’s Mercury round top outboards, plus they were the only game in town at the time if you wanted something near the top end of the Wolverine's Cost Guard rated 50HP.
Click image for larger version  Name:	full.jpg Views:	1 Size:	259.2 KB ID:	10838588

That said, it turns out 1950’s Mercury outboards north of 25HP are kind of rare out here in the deserts of Utah. After several months of checking the local classifieds, a 1958 Sunset Orange Mk55EL turned up!
Click image for larger version  Name:	full.jpg Views:	1 Size:	159.7 KB ID:	10838589

Complete and in decent shape, the only real issue was the long shaft configuration, as the boat has a 16" transom. I went ahead a bought it, figuring I'd use spacer blocks on the transom for now.

I was getting ready to send it out for rebuild when a 1959 Mk55A unexpectedly turned up 150 miles from me (that's "local" for most western states).
Click image for larger version  Name:	full.jpg Views:	1 Size:	170.4 KB ID:	10838590

I like the look of the round top housing better, but the white motor (while rated for the same 40hp) had the larger 44cid block. Turns out this block will still fit in the round top case (and vice versa) so I sent the 1959 44cid powerhead off to Wisconsin for a rebuild and a few upgrades.
Click image for larger version  Name:	full.jpg Views:	1 Size:	118.4 KB ID:	10838591

Here are a few details from Chuck Petersen, the engine builder:

“In 1958, there were 2 Mercury choices to be had in the 35-45 hp. range. The 40cid AJ carb MK55 and the 44cid KA carb MK58. That expanded to 3 in 1959 with the MK35A, MK55A and MK58A. In reality these motors covered a 5 hp. range (40-45), but it allowed the number of product offerings to expand. This trend continued during the "white motor" era with 40 and 44 cid blocks eventually offered in 5 levels - M300, M350, M400, M450 & M500. (With the M500 producing 50hp from this same 44 cid block.)

The MK55A is a 1-year only hybrid detuned 44cid motor with small AJ50A (think MK55) carbs. The good news for a guy in 2020 looking for a performance 44 build includes the fact these restricted motors led fairly easy lives. All the internal parts are just the ticket for a performance build including the large-opening brass reed cages with labyrinth seal. The carb openings can be custom machined to flow better vs. a stock MK58. Guys learned this trick when the APBA made 40cid service blocks legal for D-Stock classes. The cases could be machined specifically for KA carb bodies vs. the much wider Carter specs. The exhaust ports receive a custom port modification designed to significantly increase performance.”

Original Carbs:
Click image for larger version  Name:	full.jpg Views:	1 Size:	62.8 KB ID:	10838592

Upgraded Carbs:
Click image for larger version  Name:	full.jpg Views:	1 Size:	116.7 KB ID:	10838593

Current state of the rebuild (everything machined and balanced, re assembly starting this week.)
full.jpg
 

Attachments

  • full.jpg
    full.jpg
    172.8 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:

sphelps

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
11,475
Ok now I have serious motor envy ...
But the 62 Merc 450 that’s waiting for me to get going on will do ok once restored I think ..
Still has a bit of the classic style and only around 8 or 10 years newer than the boat ..
‘Yep the W-6 does make you think it’s a #6 though ..
Im just calling mine Circa 1950 LOL!
 

Chris in Utah

Seaman
Joined
Sep 25, 2019
Messages
57
Ok now I have serious motor envy ...
But the 62 Merc 450 that’s waiting for me to get going on will do ok once restored I think ..
Still has a bit of the classic style and only around 8 or 10 years newer than the boat ..
‘Yep the W-6 does make you think it’s a #6 though ..
Im just calling mine Circa 1950 LOL!

I am looking forward to hanging this motor on the boat (even changing the bottom paint from blue to red to better match) but I would have been happy with a Merc 450 if one had turned up first. I suspect you'll have similar performance (through prop exhaust is quieter too) plus the white goes well with the bottom paint on your boat.

I debated going through the Mk55A myself, but I don’t have any 2 stroke experience, and I do have a laundry list of other projects competing for the time. Chuck is an expert and a craftsman, so I figured it was worth farming out the power head rebuild. I justified the expense a couple ways:
  1. Sale of the 70hp currently on the boat covers most of it
  2. A new 50 hp outboard cost considerably more than rebuilding the classic
  3. I want to trust the motor… I have oars on board, but I’d rather not use them
 

Chris in Utah

Seaman
Joined
Sep 25, 2019
Messages
57
Sam,

You came up with an inovative method to seal the transom on your Wolverine project:
full.jpg

How difficult was it to separate the transom from the molded plywood hull once you got the screws out? I know it was a while ago, but any tips for someone who is contemplating doing the same?
 

sphelps

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
11,475
It wasn't difficult .. Just used a 5 in one tool and a hammer..Once all the fasteners are out just wedge it in the joint and gently lift the plywood little by little ... It gets a little harder where the splash rail is on the sides but you really only need a small gap to push the thickened epoxy in .. The nails was just there to keep the gap opened up a bit for the epoxy ..
Mine hasn't leaked a drop ...:joyous:
 
Top