350 magnum mpi mysterious failures

ljc cox

Cadet
Joined
Apr 13, 2006
Messages
22
We have a 2001 Sea Ray 310 Sundancer with 2 350 magnum MPI bluewater inboards with v drives. We have had numerous problems, the most serious being total failure on both sides within a year. Mechanics don't know why. Headgaskets blown, tuliped valves, destroyed pistons. Engine has had all reccommended care and operation according to mercruiser manuals. Engine ran perfectly until failure. Even during complete failure, never indicated overtemp and oil pressure remained normal. ECM's record no evidence of overtemp or Rpm. No water ingestion. <br /><br />Any Ideas???????<br /><br />Laura
 

Haut Medoc

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Jun 29, 2004
Messages
10,645
Re: 350 magnum mpi mysterious failures

Welcome to iboats :) <br />Lugging due to incorrect props?....JK
 

ljc cox

Cadet
Joined
Apr 13, 2006
Messages
22
Re: 350 magnum mpi mysterious failures

We have asked that same question. Every Mercruiser mechanic we speak with says no way. However, the v drive was changed from velvet drives to hurth v drives mid year. We have the hurth v drive and larger props than our buddy with the same boat and velvet drives and smaller props.<br /><br />Laura
 

tommays

Admiral
Joined
Jul 4, 2004
Messages
6,768
Re: 350 magnum mpi mysterious failures

What was your WOT rpm before thay failed ?<br /><br /><br />tommays
 

ljc cox

Cadet
Joined
Apr 13, 2006
Messages
22
Re: 350 magnum mpi mysterious failures

between 4650 and 4700. Starboard engine always burned 2 gph more than port according to flowscan. Also, Starboard engine has lots of sooty residue according to mech.<br /><br />Laura
 

Haut Medoc

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Jun 29, 2004
Messages
10,645
Re: 350 magnum mpi mysterious failures

Well, the symptoms you describe are classic results of incorrect propping....<br />The make of the drives is immaterial....<br />However, the gear reduction ratio has everything to do with it....<br />& the props ;) .....JK
 

ljc cox

Cadet
Joined
Apr 13, 2006
Messages
22
Re: 350 magnum mpi mysterious failures

The props on our boat are 17/20. I think the gear ratio is 2:1.<br /><br />Laura
 

Haut Medoc

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Jun 29, 2004
Messages
10,645
Re: 350 magnum mpi mysterious failures

These symptoms are classic results of lugging or over advanced ignition timing....<br />There are others on this forum who are more knowlegeble than I am, especially with your specific set up....<br />Your WOT sounds about right, I think & that should make the props OK too.....<br />I would wait for Don S., Rodbolt's or Newport Dave's input on this one, they are in the biz....JK
 

ljc cox

Cadet
Joined
Apr 13, 2006
Messages
22
Re: 350 magnum mpi mysterious failures

Thanks! We need to find out what is wrong before we end up with another destroyed engine. This will be the third new engine in the boat. The starboard was replaced by Mercruiser when new due to excessive oil consumption. Thank goodness we have had an extended warranty, but that is up next year.
 

newport dave

Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
458
Re: 350 magnum mpi mysterious failures

You really would have to look at each failure individually and in much more detail than you have given here to come up with anything other than a guess. There may be a different cause for each failure. <br /><br />It's your mechanic(s) job to figure out why. If he can't, don't use him anymore.<br /><br />Dave
 

ljc cox

Cadet
Joined
Apr 13, 2006
Messages
22
Re: 350 magnum mpi mysterious failures

Dave,<br /><br />We have changed mechanics. Used to use Marine Max, the dealer we bought the boat from, but we don't speak to them anymore. Our experience with both failures is the same. Our current mechanic feels something external to the engine itself is causing the failure, but can't pinpoint it. We have asked Mercruiser to look into it, but they are just as baffled so far. I am looking for ideas we can question them on. We are trying to get photos of the port engine that failed last year from the warranty company. MArine Max could offer no explination as to why the port engine failed last year. Now we are in the same "boat" again. Failure typical of overheating, but no evidence of overheating. <br /><br />We have heard it is possible for the ECM's to compensate so much for a malfunction that the engines can run fine unitl failure. Any truth to that?? How is an operator to know about a problem if the engine hides it until it just can't run anymore??<br /><br />What other details would help???<br /><br />Laura
 

RubberFrog

Rear Admiral
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Messages
4,268
Re: 350 magnum mpi mysterious failures

How far are you from ketchikan alaska? Maybe ole Cap'n Don can solve your dilemma.<br /><br />Or there's Bondo in upstate New York.
 

rodbolt

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Sep 1, 2003
Messages
20,066
Re: 350 magnum mpi mysterious failures

are these engines closed cooling?<br />if both engines have detonated pistons and swallowed valves, by swallo I mean acutally pulled the vale into the head and "tuliped" the face, then its a classic sign of excessive combustion chamber temps.<br /> thre are a few causes, the biggest in the marine industry is overproped for the RPM your turning, boat that big and heavy I will try to prop it so it can turn 5200 or so.<br /> we have had issues in the past with the 5.7L motors swallowing valves. almost every one was over propped for the conditions.<br /> next time also check the fuel delivery vacum. a restriction can create lean issues that will burn pistons/valves.<br />and yes the ECU can mask many symptoms, wont hide them, a good tech with a laptop can see when things are actually an inrange failure or something is not right and the ECU doesnt "see" it. the ECU is mostly stupid, takes all sorts of inputs and makes a few outputs to modify its base map. occasionally if two sensors get to far off the ecu will set a code and power down.<br /> most older ones wont and the result is tulips for valves.<br /> without having been part of the assesment its hard to say but I would double check the propping, sometimes on those water campers with marginal power we have to underprop them to keep them alive. after that go through the check list about the causes and remidies for detonation and excessive combustion temps.<br />and on the next set verify ign timing and advance with a light not just the scan tool. I have seen some lieing ECU's.retarded ign timing can create excessive exhaust/combustion heat as can over advanced timing. usually the knock sensor will pick up over advanced, in fact if its knocking a lot the sensor will retard timing and can create the very problem its supposed to solve.
 

ljc cox

Cadet
Joined
Apr 13, 2006
Messages
22
Re: 350 magnum mpi mysterious failures

The engines are not closed cooling. Thanks for the tips. We had a lot of problems with the starboard engine after the initial replacement. Burned too much gas, wouldn't make min rpm, engines wouldn't sync and burned 2gph more than port engine. They played with tuning the props, adjusted the timing, etc. Marine Max said the excess fuel burn was normal. Other mercruiser certified mechanics say no way it is normal.<br /><br />How do we check prop size?? We only ever developed 4650 to 4700 on the starboard and 4800 on port. Is there a way around the ECU??? <br /><br />Laura<br />Houston Tx
 

Reel Poor

Vice Admiral
Joined
Jan 29, 2005
Messages
5,522
Re: 350 magnum mpi mysterious failures

rodbolt has pretty well summed it up for you in his post. I to agree that the boat is marginal on power and should be under proped to survive. I know those Searay inboards dont usually get over there own bow wake at cruise speeds, (boat does not actually get up on plane, and maintains a high bow angel) and at cruise (under these conditions) is most likely where the motor is lugging and causing the motor failure.<br /><br />You could use a set of 8.1 Liter 375hp engines.
 

Reel Poor

Vice Admiral
Joined
Jan 29, 2005
Messages
5,522
Re: 350 magnum mpi mysterious failures

Originally posted by captain2:<br /> Marine Max said the excess fuel burn was normal. <br /><br />Is there a way around the ECU??? <br /><br />Laura<br />Houston Tx
Marine max is full of **** if thats what they told you.<br /><br />There is no way around the ECU's, Short of going with carburated engines, and you don't want to go that rout.
 

ljc cox

Cadet
Joined
Apr 13, 2006
Messages
22
Re: 350 magnum mpi mysterious failures

>>Marine max is full of **** if thats what they told you.>><br /><br />Marine Max ( or Maxi Pad as my husband likes to call them) is full of a lot of stuff. That's why we don't speak to them anymore.<br /><br />Still need to find out how to prove the prop issue? Can anyone direct me to any sources? I will purchase manuals if needed so I can gather the data. Will also consider hiring a consultant. If you know anybody, please contact me at lauc174@aol.com.<br /><br />Thanks!! The info is very helpful. I intend to become an expert on this issue.<br /><br />Laura <br />Houston Tx
 

Don S

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Aug 31, 2004
Messages
62,321
Re: 350 magnum mpi mysterious failures

Did any of these "Dealers" get Merc tech service to come out and check the engines???<br />Out of curiosity, what is the serial numbers on those engines I would like to check on a couple of things on your engines in particular.
 

uaw9fan

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Oct 25, 2005
Messages
112
Re: 350 magnum mpi mysterious failures

Where do you buy your fuel? Is it the same place everytime? What octane is the fuel?<br /><br />The reason I ask is that I recall a teacher saying that the ECM on some motors work only on 87 octane. Supposedly as the engine is started and running the ECM will advance timing up until it detects a knock and then sets that point as a max timing advance.If you run 92 octane the ECM may never detect a knock and will continue to run with a little bit more timing advance under the assumption that it is OK because it does not detect a knock.<br />Actually now that I say that,Have you checked your knock sensors?
 
Top