Surveyor David Pascoe in his book "Buyers Guide to Outboard Boats" says the following:<br /><br />"It is incontestable that the stern drive power option is the most troublesome and ultimatly costly to own."<br /><br />He goes on the explain why (Galvanic corrosion, etc) but his biggest argument is the very high cost of parts and repair. He also says:<br /><br />"...stern drives are a poor choice for any boat that is going to remain afloat in sea water."<br /><br />He also feels that Mercruiser is the worst of the lot based on his 20 years experience.<br /><br />Compelling arguments. But I still see a large number of boats here in the Northeast used in sea (salt) water that seem to do fine year after year.<br /><br />Can someone put this in perspective for me?<br /><br />I'm looking for a boat now. Should I look for an inboard? Am I rolling the dice with an I/O? <br /><br />What's your opinion?<br /><br />Thanks Tony
I have also owned numerous outboards, and have also found them to be pretty dependable. The I/O system has the advantage of a power plant that can actually be worked on by a normal person.<br /><br />My current boat is a straight inboard with Paragon transmission, and I much prefer it over the other types...just seems simpler and has given zero problems over the years.<br /><br />As far as Pascoe is concerned...he is clearly experienced and knowledgeable... I respect his opinions and often agree with him. However, our priorities and viewpoints sometimes differ. My advice would be to spend some time around the marinas in your area, talking to boat owners and mechanics...you will soon get a feel for what works best in your area for the type of boating that you want to do.