Democrat Debate Comments

[OldMercsRule]

Tony Blankley had some observations about what many missed Monday night.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/07/democratic_debate_comments.html

 

[OldMercsRule]

Re: Democrat Debate Comments

Here's another shot at Edwards:


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/07/john_edwards_trial_lawyer_to_t.html

 

[RubberFrog]

Re: Democrat Debate Comments

Please stop calling it a debate. I did not hear any "debating" amidst the coached question and answer session.

It was a friendly chat amongst a group of traitors.

 

[RubberFrog]

Re: Democrat Debate Comments

I like this comment directed at the cut 'n' run crowd- "They should think about Napoleon's withdrawal from Moscow." I doubt most of these libs even know that Napolean went to Moscow!

 

[OldMercsRule]

Re: Democrat Debate Comments

I guess Mrs. Edwards will not eat any more tangerines due to her corncerns about global warming, according to Ben Smiths' blog on Politico 7/24/2007. I guess the war with Islamo Facism is a "bumper sticker" but 'global warmin' is something we all need to fear n' sign over all our economic policies to the Libs so China can own the world we now live in. Does it make ya proud to be a Democrat Mrs. Jones? Style over substance every time fer dim wits I say! Oh yah, I almost fergot: Is Liberalism a mental disorder? JR

 

[Haut Medoc]

Re: Democrat Debate Comments

I like this comment directed at the cut 'n' run crowd- "They should think about Napoleon's withdrawal from Moscow." I doubt most of these libs even know that Napolean went to Moscow!

He didn't withdraw from Moscow, he advanced on Paris.....SHEESH!....

 

[crabby_bob]

Re: Democrat Debate Comments

"Just as our troops are fighting the terrorists in Iraq so we don't have to face them here at home, " That's as far as I got. With an opening statement like that I didn't see a any reason to go further.

 

[OldMercsRule]

Re: Democrat Debate Comments

"Just as our troops are fighting the terrorists in Iraq so we don't have to face them here at home, " That's as far as I got. With an opening statement like that I didn't see a any reason to go further.

Hmmmmm good fer you CrabbyBob. Can't tell if yer Cornservative or Liberal but yer mind seems to be made up n' ya apparently see no more need fer any additional information. The Liberal glowing positives about all the Democrats or negatives about Iraq n' President Bush are easy to read or see, jus' tune to ABC,NBC,CBS,PBS,or CNN. Doesn't matter where ya go the message is the same. Same with print news NYT,LAT,CT,WP. If ya wanna cornsider a point of view other then the above Tony Blankley is a thoughtfull and informed and articulate cornservative with valid thoughts. You may not agree but exposure to information sure does not hurt.

As to the validity of the statement that seems ta stop ya cold; John Kerry, n' the rest of the candidates fer President Democrats are selling the point of view that the war in Iraq is materially worsening our safety at home. Do politicians, (Republicans and Democrats), tell ya what they think ya wanna hear, or do you seriously think they speak the truth? Have ya had an IED explode in the road in front of the house yet? Have ya seen lots of buildings fall since 9/11/2001? It seems that takin' the fight to the bad guys where they live has worked, (but I only have one brain cell). Guess it really gets ya when someone states an obvious cornclusion eh?

Tell ya what: if the Democrats succeed in forcing us to give up hard won territory in Iraq to our enemies, me thinks you'll find out how fun it is to deal with this type of enemy who use seventh century tactics when they come over here n' play in yer yard. Maybe ya wanna look into pickin' up a prayer rug or two. 'Course Muslims always kill more Muslims then infidels. Sorry ya didn't like the read. Respectfully JR

 

[crabby_bob]

Re: Democrat Debate Comments

Hmmmmm good fer you CrabbyBob. Can't tell if yer Cornservative or Liberal but yer mind seems to be made up n' ya apparently see no more need fer any additional information. The Liberal glowing positives about all the Democrats or negatives about Iraq n' President Bush are easy to read or see, jus' tune to ABC,NBC,CBS,PBS,or CNN. Doesn't matter where ya go the message is the same. Same with print news NYT,LAT,CT,WP. If ya wanna cornsider a point of view other then the above Tony Blankley is a thoughtfull and informed and articulate cornservative with valid thoughts. You may not agree but exposure to information sure does not hurt.

As to the validity of the statement that seems ta stop ya cold; John Kerry, n' the rest of the candidates fer President Democrats are selling the point of view that the war in Iraq is materially worsening our safety at home. Do politicians, (Republicans and Democrats), tell ya what they think ya wanna hear, or do you seriously think they speak the truth? Have ya had an IED explode in the road in front of the house yet? Have ya seen lots of buildings fall since 9/11/2001? It seems that takin' the fight to the bad guys where they live has worked, (but I only have one brain cell). Guess it really gets ya when someone states an obvious cornclusion eh?

Tell ya what: if the Democrats succeed in forcing us to give up hard won territory in Iraq to our enemies, me thinks you'll find out how fun it is to deal with this type of enemy who use seventh century tactics when they come over here n' play in yer yard. Maybe ya wanna look into pickin' up a prayer rug or two. 'Course Muslims always kill more Muslims then infidels. Sorry ya didn't like the read. Respectfully JR

I don't believe the opening line is a true statement but I can't prove it isn't. I think it's his use of the phrase "the terrorist" instead of "some terrorists" that bothers me. I figure the terrorist can do a lot of damage with a handful of "martyrs" and they can't all be in Iraq. From what I hear some of them are in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Apparently there are some in Spain, England and the USA as well and I'm willing to bet the plan for the next attack on the US is being hatched in Pakistan, not Iraq.

I credit the Bush administration with gathering and acting on intelligence for the absence of IEDs in front of my house. I think it supports John Kerry's statement that counter terrorism is largely a police action based on intelligence. I'm willing to give the Feds the benefit of the doubt on the Patriot Act because I suspect it's helping.

There are other clues that suggest the article is not worth reading. I scanned few lines down and saw a reference to a $400 dollar hair cut. I'm not interested in things like that. Seems kind of catty to me.

Last night I was listening to a speech the President gave regarding Iraq and he made the same claim about fighting them there so we don't have to fight them here. I didn't believe him when he said it either but I didn't change the radio station. I probably would have if he had started talking about John Edwards hair.

 

[OldMercsRule]

Re: Democrat Debate Comments

I don't believe the opening line is a true statement but I can't prove it isn't.

Ya can't prove it isn't true because it is true.

I think it's his use of the phrase "the terrorist" instead of "some terrorists" that bothers me. I figure the terrorist can do a lot of damage with a handful of "martyrs" and they can't all be in Iraq. From what I hear some of them are in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Apparently there are some in Spain, England and the USA as well and I'm willing to bet the plan for the next attack on the US is being hatched in Pakistan, not Iraq.

CrabbyBob: It is a world wide cornflict that has been goin' on fer 1500 years give or take a few. The technology of both weapons and communications and money that flows to oil producers have given the Islamo Facists the means and ability to attack innocents anywhere on the planet. As in all wars they are less able to hammer us if they are on the run, (as they are in the real world), they are only winnin' in the MSM and the minds of Liberals and Democrats that want to force our defeat fer political gain. IT is all propaganda: CrabbyBob. Once we leave in disgrace as the Dem candidates all want (every one of them), n' the moderate Muslims that are now our tentative allies are slaughtered. They will be payin' us a visit. That does not take much insight to predict, (just a single functional brain cell n' a bit of knowledge of history), real simple.

I credit the Bush administration with gathering and acting on intelligence for the absence of IEDs in front of my house. I think it supports John Kerry's statement that counter terrorism is largely a police action based on intelligence.

Hmmmmm, did ya know that ol' John Kerry n' his pals: the Lib Dems are the ones who cut our intelligence to the bone over the last three decades? Is that another bit of news n' facts ya don't wanna read or know about? Ya really think a bunch of lawyers are more effective then the USMC: CrabbyBob? Do ya want the good ol' boys at Gitmo to have taxpayer funded lawyers n' make us prove beyound a reasonable doubt that they want to kill you and yer family?

I'm willing to give the Feds the benefit of the doubt on the Patriot Act because I suspect it's helping.

That's not the position of all the Democrats CrabbyBob!!! I glad you feel that way.

There are other clues that suggest the article is not worth reading. I scanned few lines down and saw a reference to a $400 dollar hair cut. I'm not interested in things like that. Seems kind of catty to me.

I guess ya have to rationalize votin' fer a snake who is worth multi millions raising funds SPECIFICALLY for his campaign violating the law n' havein' his wonderfull "breck girl" hair cut fer a measily $1200.00. I would not want to read about that if I had any honor as a Democrat voter either: CrabbyBob. I would not want to know much other then all aspects of homosexuality n' victimhood so I could hold my empty head high n' vote fer John Edwards.

Last night I was listening to a speech the President gave regarding Iraq and he made the same claim about fighting them there so we don't have to fight them here. I didn't believe him when he said it either but I didn't change the radio station. I probably would have if he had started talking about John Edwards hair.

So I guess ya have seen some American planes bringin' down buildings or IEDs n' blowin' up in the malls n' roads here in America then eh? Is Liberalism a mental disorder? Respectfully, (Thanks fer the reply, I'm still cornfused as you are an articulate feller) JR

 

[crabby_bob]

Re: Democrat Debate Comments

So I guess ya have seen some American planes bringin' down buildings or IEDs n' blowin' up in the malls n' roads here in America then eh? Is Liberalism a mental disorder? Respectfully, (Thanks fer the reply, I'm still cornfused as you are an articulate feller) JR

Hi,

I don't know how to respond to this post so I'll let it go except to say I know I don't express myself well and have been told that many times. Last month for example I had to hold a functional spec review and it was probably the worst review in the history of the company because no one understood what I was trying to say. I really got my butt kicked, especially when the project manager said parts of the document made no sense. I've spent the last 4 weeks trying to clean up the document and am not looking forward to re-review.

I really don't care to argue politics. I'd prefer to discuss solutions. Sorry if I hurt your feelings. I shouldn't have posted.

take care
crabby bob

 

[OldMercsRule]

Re: Democrat Debate Comments

Hi,

I don't know how to respond to this post so I'll let it go except to say I know I don't express myself well and have been told that many times. Last month for example I had to hold a functional spec review and it was probably the worst review in the history of the company because no one understood what I was trying to say. I really got my butt kicked, especially when the project manager said parts of the document made no sense. I've spent the last 4 weeks trying to clean up the document and am not looking forward to re-review.

Maybe you have a problem expressing yerself at times. That said: I thought you were real clear on this thread. More importantly you very clearly demonstrated THE BIG PROBLEM this Great Country faces, that is why I took you to task as I did and plan to do again as you depart DC. BTW, I do not mean anything personal here.

I really don't care to argue politics. I'd prefer to discuss solutions.

I don't like to argue politics either, I luv to debate or discuss politics in as positive a way as I can that may lead to a potential solution.

Ya see: I think many Americans from the Right or Left would agree much more and there would likely be much more in the way of solutions if their were civil discussions and real time polite debates about politics, as does actually happen here on DC. I know I learn a lot from the others here on DC, and I learn more from those I dissagree with then those who I agree with.

We are in a historic period of time here. Old media is clashing with new media, and new media seems to be winning, (even though old media has put their hat in the ring clearly on the side of our enemies), and clearly misrepresented the Iraq war and used enemy propaganda to demoralize the American people, with the help of vocal lying Democrat leaders.

Both Democrats and Republicans are without a sitting President or VP, and the field is wide open. We are in a war that you apparently view as a criminal affair and I view as a 1500 year old deadly world wide conflict with a large part of the world's population engaged or potentially engaged.

The Democrats are following their same old play book they followed in the late 1960s with Vietnam, (helping the Communists win back then and trying to help the Islamists win this time). It worked well then, I predict it will not work this time.

I live in Seattle and I meet people here like you and WillyBWright that will not tolerate any infromation that offends their sensabilities. Your refusal to even read a point of view that you can't find in the dominate media is normal for Liberals here in Seattle and folks like you and Willy. That is why I made such a big deal about it as it shows how intolerant Liberals are not the tolerance they falsely project to others.

If ya take the time to read n' ponder information that is not edited by Liberals ya may learn something you did not know. That is my whole point in debating with you on this thread. I lost the debate with you, but another thoughtfull lurker may cornsider our debate and decide to read n' learn n' think critical thoughts. It is a wonder Cornservatives even exist in the PC world we now live in but they do. That my friend: gives me hope!!!

Sorry if I hurt your feelings.

You did not hurt my feelings at all! I hope I did not hurt yours by making an example of yer intolerance for information other then Liberal Kool aid.

I shouldn't have posted.

I'm glad you did, as it made part of my day.

take care
crabby bob

You too, Crabby Bob, I don't think yer so Crabby!! Respectfully, (and I really mean it). JR