Difficult balancing question for engine rebuilders.

Silly Seville

Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Dec 5, 2009
Messages
798
Hi Guys, this is long and probably complicated. I appreciate your patience.

I'm in a real pickle here, and I hope the solution is really simple, and I'm just making it more difficult than it needs to be.

I bought a 1988 boat with a Mercruiser 4.3LX 205hp V6. Block and heads were freeze damaged beyond salvage. I knew this when I bought the boat (very very cheap) My intention was to drop a more modern 2000 model Chevy Vortec V6 from a truck in it's place, since I have done that successfully twice before with 350 V8's. The only fundamental difference between a 1988 and 2000 model 4.3 V6 is the '88 was not a balance shaft engine, and of course did not have the Vortec heads.

I stripped every last marine specific part off the junk engine before tossing it, and kept nothing from the donor truck engine since none of the accessories designed for the truck are compatible in the boat. The truck engine had a flexplate, (automatic tranny) so that was tossed since I clearly couldn't use it. I did keep the truck engine harmonic damper believing that it had to stay with the rotating assembly, and thought I would be able to use the flywheel from the original junk engine.

Well, here is my dilemma. The truck engine used a serpentine drive belt with the wide single crankshaft pulley and a small, lightweight damper (6.25")
In contrast, the original boat engine uses a heavier 6.75" diameter damper, and two single groove V-belt pulleys stacked on each other. The double stack V-belt pulleys will not mate with the smaller diameter damper. I have to use those pulleys! So the million dollar question is...can I use the stock damper that came on the boat engine, or will that throw off the reciprocating balance of the much newer Vortec engine? The same question also applies to the flywheel. Can I use the original 1988 boat engine's flywheel on this 2000 model V6, or will I have to replace it with a flywheel specific to this engine?

Before anyone answers, I will tell you I already asked the machinist who prepped the block for me the same questions. He said that I must continue to use the smaller lighter harmonic damper that came with the truck engine, but that I could throw any old SBC flywheel on there I wanted, (assuming 1 piece rear main seal version) and the reciprocating assembly wouldn't know the difference.

I found that hard to believe since the flywheels are weighted for specific engines from the factory. If he's wrong, I'm going to have to pay big money to have a shop balance the engine, and I really don't think that's necessary with the original rotating assembly still in place. I don't mind buying a new flywheel and harmonic damper if necessary to keep this engine from shaking itself apart, but I also don't want to toss the original equipment if it will function just fine with this newer engine.

Am I making this more complicated than it really is, or does the size and weight of the harmonic damper really have a profound affect on the internal balance of the engine, in conjunction with the weighted configuration of the flywheel? BTW, I tried finding a harmonic damper specific to the 2000 model engine in a version that would accept the double V-belt pulleys, and as far as I can tell, such a damper doesn't exist.

Thanks to everyone in advance who has an opinion or advice in this matter, and keep in mind, I'm typing this at 4:30 am. Maybe I'm too tired to think straight!
 

flipbro

Master Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Feb 8, 2013
Messages
830
You are better off to run the 6.75 balancer on a boat anyway. Your crank bobweights and rod big ends are the more important things to be balanced witch you are fine since you didnt change rodes or pistons..
 

Bondo

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 17, 2002
Messages
71,079
Ayuh,.... The 4.3l is Unique in the SBC world,.....

The 4.3l needs the proper harmonic balancer, 'n flywheel, Per it's Vintage,.....

You can probably get the larger balancer, for yer motor, to fit the right pulley, I ain't sure on that one,....
But, I know for a fact, the 4.3ls Don't use the standard netrual balance SBC flywheels,.....

The balance of these motors changed quite a few times, 'n I don't know the break down of which years fits what,....
Except, the flywheels, 'n balancers changed in '85/ '86,... again 'round '93/ '94, 'n possibly again after that,....

Some time spent lookin' through parts books, checkin' part numbers oughta lead ya to what ya need,....
 
Last edited:

Silly Seville

Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Dec 5, 2009
Messages
798
Ayuh,.... The 4.3l is Unique in the SBC world,.....

The 4.3l needs the proper harmonic balancer, 'n flywheel, Per it's Vintage,.....

You can probably get the larger balancer, for yer motor, to fit the right pulley, I ain't sure on that one,....
But, I know for a fact, the 4.3ls Don't use the standard netrual balance SBC flywheels,.....

The balance of these motors changed quite a few times, 'n I don't know the break down of which years fits what,....
Except, the flywheels, 'n balancers changed in '85/ '86,... again 'round '93/ '94, 'n possibly again after that,....

Some time spent lookin' through parts books, checkin' part numbers oughta lead ya to what ya need,....

This is what I was afraid of hearing. I've done a ton of research prior to my initial post, and had come to the same conclusion, especially considering that when I looked up the numbers for the damper and flywheel for both the '88 and 2000 engine applications, I found completely different part numbers. So that was my first clue that there might be an incompatibility issue.

I have pretty much resigned myself to the fact that I will have to buy a new flywheel that is specifically weighted for this rotating assembly. ( I wish the donor truck had been a stick shift!) I don't mind because I knew these 4.3's were externally balanced, and might require a specific flywheel...but what grinds my gears is the fact that 1996 was the year GM went to the serpentine belt drive system, and therefore the crank pulley is shaped specially to fit inside the damper, instead of flat up against the face of it, as it does with the old V-belt system. The only alternative I have is to change every pulley that was on the marine engine and exchange for the serpentine system from a post '96 model. That will be stupid expensive. In hindsight, I wish I had looked for a 1995 or earlier engine as a donor, but I wanted the true Vortec heads...which of course didn't come out until '96!

I have searched every retail automotive store website for a harmonic damper for the '96-2000 model applications that has a flat face instead of the dished out area in the front. I cannot find anything! The only dampers that are showing up with the necessary flat front mating surface are super expensive fluid filled racing dampers.

Does anyone have ANY idea how I can use my existing V-belt style crankshaft pulleys with the required harmonic damper for this 2000 model truck engine. Or perhaps, the better question is, CAN I use the heavier old style damper that came with the '88 engine without twisting the crankshaft to pieces?
 

Silly Seville

Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Dec 5, 2009
Messages
798
Thanks to all who gave me pointers. I figured it out. My mistake was looking through the automotive parts manuals for a damper and flywheel, when I should have went straight to the Mercruiser catalog. :facepalm:

As it turns out, the '96 and up marine 4.3 still used a flat-faced harmonic damper with a serpentine belt pulley similar in design to the automotive version, but different enough that it fits the damper face correctly. This is a case of me assuming the only damper available would be the automotive version, but I was wrong. Now that I know the correct parts are available for this engine, I can happily move ahead. :D
 
Top