Re: engine timing....
Well Dhadley, that makes sense. I'm familiar with rise time, (I've made my living in electronics for the last 40 years) and it's logical. As the flywheel spins faster, the trigger voltage becomes greater and the SCR's triggering point is reached sooner. The question would be at what rpm do the trigger coils/scr input conditioning circuitry saturate and the voltage, hence the triggering point (timing), no longer increase significantly. <br />I think I'll time it in the cranking mode a degree or so retarded, and then check it while running full tilt to see how much additional advance occurs. I need to run it a few hours at reduced throttle settings to break it in before any full throttle operation. The idea of standing in the back of the boat hold a timing light over the uncowled motor while running 40 mph plus does NOT appeal to me. <br />grandx, as far as retarding the timing, I concur. Excessive retard is just as bad as excessive advance. Excessive retard will take longer to do damage but it can eventually cause an engine to destroy itself. A few degrees of retard should be benificial, however, to my old motor which was designed to run on late 1970's fuels.<br />I'm still trying to decide what grade of fuel to use, 87 or 89. I've not see a clear consensus of which is best on this board. I'm concerned that the compression ratio on my oldie but goodie is to high for today's 87 octane fuels. <br />The whole issue evolves into two questions; what grade of fuel and what max advance timing spec to use. I'm still not certain.<br />Thanks for all the input and I'm still soliciting comments.<br />Bill.........