.
Got a 1996 Bayliner with Force 120 HP engine. I think this engine needs reeds and it probably needs its 2 cylinder rebuilt as well (due to broker reed leaf ???). re: All PSIs are 150 and this Cylinder #2 is consistently 120 (way past the 15 PSI variance range). Thus, a top end tear down and new rings (maybe larger piston ???) is required.
Down the road, the guy has a used 1992 Mercury 115 HP (with its controls) for sale. It has consistent PSI of 125s-128s in all cylinders, has setup on stand for viewing / testing, and is a good price. Its more than I wanted to pay for it but when all is said and done (and after selling broken Force 120 for parts), it might be a better "reliability deal" than rebuilding the Force 120.
With above in mind…. Should I rebuild the Force 120 or bolt on the 115 Merc? If wondering, I have a 1996 Bayliner 1700LS - that can easily support a 120 or 115 OB with ease (assuming similar OB engine stock length)?
thanks
Got a 1996 Bayliner with Force 120 HP engine. I think this engine needs reeds and it probably needs its 2 cylinder rebuilt as well (due to broker reed leaf ???). re: All PSIs are 150 and this Cylinder #2 is consistently 120 (way past the 15 PSI variance range). Thus, a top end tear down and new rings (maybe larger piston ???) is required.
Down the road, the guy has a used 1992 Mercury 115 HP (with its controls) for sale. It has consistent PSI of 125s-128s in all cylinders, has setup on stand for viewing / testing, and is a good price. Its more than I wanted to pay for it but when all is said and done (and after selling broken Force 120 for parts), it might be a better "reliability deal" than rebuilding the Force 120.
With above in mind…. Should I rebuild the Force 120 or bolt on the 115 Merc? If wondering, I have a 1996 Bayliner 1700LS - that can easily support a 120 or 115 OB with ease (assuming similar OB engine stock length)?
thanks