Re: GM 6.5 V8 diesel
We're not thinking of pulling extra power so the only work being done is the usual ends, mains, rings, water pump, etc. (The engine has very little wear).The idea is to use it lightly with more emphasis on reliability than performance. It will replace a 70hp UK Ford lump so even with its modest power we should see a difference. So far cost has been low so if it keeps going we'll be happy.
Thanks all.
You'll of course need jacketed exhaust manifolds, closed cooling heat exchanger, raw water pump mounting etc. That engine will reliably produce about 160hp 'continuously' ..........you probably won't run it that way though..........
70hp lump? is that a 4 cylinder lump? If so, That 6.5l V-8 will probably be twice the weight in the back of that boat. Pay particular attention to the drive ratio in your DP-C and propset.
That engine is only going to turn 2000-3000 (cruise) the way you'll use it probably.................but you still want to be able to turn it 'up against' the governor at wide open throttle up (WOT)
If you are geared too "tall" (to high ratio/high pitch propset) .............It will be an over-fueled smoky mess when you throttle-up!!
Geared too low, and you'll be right up against the gov and barely moving!
If the drive is a petrol engine drive (fairly low ratio) then you might be able to make up for the gearing by going with a fairly high propset. I don't know how high the VP prop-sets go (F1,2,3,......7,8 etc) but you'll need to experiment.
If that's NOT a planing type hull and you don't expect to plane, it might not matter much but for best efficiency, you want the engine to still be capable of making max RPM at or near the governed max speed @WOT.
If you still have a LOT of throttle left, at governed RPM, then the gearing and/or propset is WAY TOO LOW.
The non-turbocharged 6.5L engine is a really smooth, reliable engine with the mechanical injection pump. It's just not a "power-house"
Regards,
Rick