Re: Grand Jury Duty
you are about to hear a one sided tail that may be true, but may be a vendetta against an innocent person. I do not like these because in effect you are being tried without defense. At the trial that comes after indictment, you cannot tell me that would not weigh on a jurist's mind. I have heard it said in exit interviews that "well the grand jury would not have indicted him if he weren't guilty". If you think someone has committed a crime, arrest them and take them to trial. Way to much power in one persons hand. I do not mean for this to seem political in any way, just my feelings for the system. I am not a paranoid person by any means, however, if the government wants to jail you, they can find a way today. Who among us at some point in time drained antifreeze out in the yard, or used oil in a ditch in the past to prevent mosquitos? There are laws broken by all of us that we don't even know. Remember they put Martha Stewart in prison for lying to a federal prosecutor. (lying to a cop) Have not all of us done that? Police officer... Do you know how fast you were going? Me I think about 35mph. (really 45mph) That is lying to a police officer. No difference from Martha Stewart. A Grand jury and trial could only find her guilty of that. She had millions of dollars for defence. Do You? So my friend I wish you luck and keep an open mind that they will be painting a very bad picture of this person with conjecture and inuendo. All legal in a grand jury.