High Thrust Engines

D

DJ

Guest
What do you all think of putting a "high thrust" engine on a planing boat? Upside-downside?

I realize those engines are designed for pontoons and heavier boats. What about one on a planing hull such as a Boston Whaler?
 

Silvertip

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Sep 22, 2003
Messages
28,771
Re: High Thrust Engines

You had best check prop availability before doing that. High-thrust and BigFoot engines run lower units with higher ratio gear sets than the standard motors so they can twist larger diameter, high blade area props with lesser pitch. If you put that engine on a planing hull you will need to prop it accordingly and a desireable prop may not be available. A pontoon prop is certainly not wanted on a planing hull. If you can prop it right, there will be no problem.
 

Texasmark

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Dec 20, 2005
Messages
14,904
Re: High Thrust Engines

My question is what is your point? On a toon, you pretty have a constant resistance to the prop since the toon just scoots along.

On a planing hull, you need enough thrust to overcome the hole shot. Once over it you don't need as much power to maintain it as the drag is less.

Merc has a 60 hp Bigfoot with a larger heavy duty 2.3:1 gearbox rather than the standard size gearbox with a 1.64:1. It will accept the same size, and has the potential for turning them at the same speed as the 75 and 90 hp engines......gonna bet they just stuck one of those lower units on a modified 60 hp midsection.

In thinking about it, I guess a 60 bigfoot would hole shoot a heavy planing hull about as easy as a 75 or 90 with about the same pitched prop or a little less. It just wouldn't have the top end that they do.

I mean, I can do the same thing with my 90 hp. I can do a hole shot with the throttle say, 3/4 open. I'll plane out (in time) and run up 20-25 mph like that only using roughly relative hp whereas a 60 on the same boat would do the same thing but would be at WOT.

With the regular 60 and the same rig otherwise, it may not have enough thrust to plane out.

Course I can't help but recollect the OMC V4 lower units on their higher hp engines (after the fat 50's....say in the early '60's timeframe) and they turned small props (for the diameters that came later) at high rpm's and seemed to push ok. I recall test driving a 75 on a 16' MFG and it had plenty of gusto.

So I just don't know, but maybe injected something to think about. One thing I can say, however, a small, high pitched, prop, on a small lower unit, running at high rpm's is very efficient at the higher speeds.......once you get it going.

Mark
 

tashasdaddy

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Nov 11, 2005
Messages
51,019
Re: High Thrust Engines

i take the idea that the wot rpms need to be in the proper range, depending on the unit it is pushing.
 

JB

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Mar 25, 2001
Messages
45,907
Re: High Thrust Engines

I wouldn't, DJ.

Those big blades make more drag, even at lower speed, and the selection of props is limited.

The only upside I see is in the first 15' of a hole shot.
 
Top