Re: How to get top dead center on 86 merc 170?
On the 470 engine you must torque the rocker arm nuts with the valves closed. So you need to be at TDC to do part of them and turn the engine 360 degrees at the crank to do the rest.
Ahhhhhhhhhhhh, so. Thanks for that info, especially since I will be re-installing my head and rockers one of these days. I assume that this info is in the manual? (I haven't looked at it yet)
That makes for an interesting procedure. I'll see what the manual says on it but it looks to me like you'd start at power-stroke TDC on #1 (as Jake says) and torque those rockers. Then rotate clockwise (vis-a-vis the front pully/hub) 180 degrees and do the rockers on #3 (firing order 1-3-4-2) , then another 180 degrees and do the rockers on #4, then another 180 degrees and do the rockers on #2, and yer done. having the pushrods in place for each of the next cylinder(s) (3,4,2) should confirm that they are both "down" before you torque the rockers for that cylinder.
I think I have that all right, but please correct me if I'm wrong.
I guess the thinking on that is that if you torque a rocker arm with the lifter in the up position, you might just bend the pushrod. I can't think of any other reason for requiring that the lifters be down when torquing the rocker arms, except maybe affecting the torque reading (which just might be the reason).
I guess it's been too long since I did a valve job or head replacement on an engine with hydraulic lifters.
Speaking of which, I need a pair of new lifters on my engine. I wonder if they are just standard Ford 460 lifters (like the head is)? Just curious since I found a supplier for the Mercruiser lifter at something like 8 bucks, which is very reasonable (might even be cheaper than the Ford dealer's price).
I've also read that I should def go with the Mercruiser head gasket. Do you have any opinion on that, Terry? I find your posts very informative and knowledgable (and thus helpful), unlike some folks here who just seem to be happy taking a shot -- like they know it all (which they clearly don't) -- as opposed to providing helpful info.
But, to each his own, I guess. Still, it looks to me like most of the "shots" I've read are basically incorrect, misleading and, frankly, pretty lame. I came on here for help from knowledgable folks willing to share, not to be the target of some troll looking to take a cheap shot in some misguided attempt to appear superior -- and then basically making an arse out of himself to anybody who really does know what's goin' on.
But, I guess whatever floats yer boat, huh?
Pun intended.
So much for
THAT tirade!!!!! End of Rant!
