Is it worth it? 1955 Mark 55

rons boat

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Dec 28, 2002
Messages
210
Before I restore a old merc Mark 55 E for my Yellow Jacket (1955) I would like to know how the Merk 55 operated. Was it reliable? Was it a dock buster or did it have a true neutral? What problems existed. Was it easy to start with the electrical system provided? <br />What was the voltage of the system? Was it noisy? I believe it to be about a 38 HP motor after derating but I am not real sure. I have one that is beautiful and almost complete but I have worked on old outboards as well as new and found certain old models to be not worth the trouble. In other words, I hope to have something when I am through or I want to move on to something that will make my boat usable.Your experience with this motor would be appreciated. Ron
 

rickdb1boat

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Jan 23, 2002
Messages
11,195
Re: Is it worth it? 1955 Mark 55

Ron,<br /><br />Here's a good link, if you haven't seen it before. Plenty of parts still available and from what I understand, it was/is a decent motor.<br /><br /> web page
 

alcan

Commander
Joined
Dec 14, 2001
Messages
2,505
Re: Is it worth it? 1955 Mark 55

Hi Ron<br />I owned and operated a mark55 for several years. Mine was not electric. They are wonderful motors. Very powerful for their size no matter how you want to rate them. As far as I'm concerned you get all 45 horses and maybe a few more. They run real smooth. Mine was a tad hard to pull over to start. But I kept it tuned well so I never had to pull more than once or twice. You may find you will want some special tools for servicing the water pump. This was one motor I never should have sold. If you ask around I think the general opinion will be that the mark55 was much loved and respected.
 

rons boat

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Dec 28, 2002
Messages
210
Re: Is it worth it? 1955 Mark 55

I appreciate all the comments and I will look at all the links suggested and take your advice to heart. Yes, this one is electric and I am curious how well that part worked and what the operating voltage was. Nice to hear that it was a good motor. My experience with my dad's new 35hp Lark in 1958 was the closest I came to this vintage motor. I always looked on with envy to those fast looking mercs of my youth. Thanks again. Ron
 

steelespike

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Apr 26, 2002
Messages
19,069
Re: Is it worth it? 1955 Mark 55

Try Johns Old Mercury Web Site excellent forum<br />lots of good links.Mark 55 was not a dock buster<br />it had true F N R.<br />it was rated at 40 hp. the 55H was rated at 40+<br /> 55H started production in 56. The basic mark 55<br />design was produced right through at least to the 1980s with many refinements and design up dates.<br /> I run its distant cousin the 1965 Merc 500<br />on a 56 Crestliner.A wonderful motor
 

Chinewalker

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Aug 19, 2001
Messages
8,902
Re: Is it worth it? 1955 Mark 55

The Mark 55s were among the best designs EVER in the outboard world - kinda the small-block Chevy's of their genre.<br /><br />That said, every step along the evolutionary track had it's pluses and minuses. The early 1955 Mk55 Electrics had a funky side-sling starter arrangement which could be troublesome. It's not difficult to update it to a more modern bendix-type starter, but you may have to swap out the recoil housing with a later Mark 55. They made them from 1955 to 1955 with many refinements along the way. <br /><br />The Mark 55s were a VERY strong 40hp and would easily hold their own against a modern 40hp, at least on a light hull. They love to run and run fast. Putting a Mark 55 on a big, heavy barge is the kiss of death.<br /><br />Many basic maintenance parts still available, starting at www.oldmercs.com for parts and manuals. I don't think Iboats has Merc manuals back that far.<br /><br />- Scott
 

rons boat

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Dec 28, 2002
Messages
210
Re: Is it worth it? 1955 Mark 55

Guys I appreciate the advice and want to pose this follow up question. What about the Mark 58A as I have one of those as well as the Mark 55 of 1955. The Mark 58 is complete but not in as good of condition as the 55 now on the boat. I suspect the mark 55 was complelely redone in the last ten years and received some updates. Are they the same basic motor or are there noteworth differences? I notice the interface plug on the side is different and the year of the Mark 58A is 1958.
 

Chinewalker

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Aug 19, 2001
Messages
8,902
Re: Is it worth it? 1955 Mark 55

Hi Ron,<br /> Actually, the Mark 58A is a 1959 model. The 'A' designation on any Mark-series motor means 1959. That was Mercury's 25-th Anniversary model year, 'A' designating anniversary.<br /> The Mark 58A and Mark 55 are quite similar with some significant differences. Most significant is the displacement, as the Mark 55 is 39.6 cubic inches, and the Mark 58A is about 44-cubic inches. The increase was gained via an increase in bore size, with all else remaining the same (rods, crankshaft, bearings, etc.). The Mark 58A also had larger intkae openings on the crankcase, which accomodated larger carburetors. The Mark 55 put out a solid 40hp, while the 58A was rated at 45hp. It is possible to sneak a Mark 58A powerhead under a Mark 55 cowling and have a bit of a sleeper motor, although you likely won't notice the difference on anything but the lightest of runabouts. Pulling power might be a bit better, too. Where you'll notice it the most is at the gas pump, as the bigger carbs will drink more fuel.<br /> The Mark 58A will also have the better starting system that uses a traditional style spin-up strter bendix, rather than the side-arm one used on the 1955 model.<br /> The lower units are interchanceable, and except for the earliest 1955 Mark 55s, the props should be interchangeable, too. Early 1955 models had a 14-spline propshaft, while all other 40/44 cube Mercs up to 1970 (or so) had 11-spline propshafts.<br /> The "interface" as you call it was updated to the more common rubber boot sometime in 1956. The earlier metal plugs work fine, but are getting harder to replace if needed.<br /> Hope that helps...<br />- Scott
 

rons boat

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Dec 28, 2002
Messages
210
Re: Is it worth it? 1955 Mark 55

Chinewalker, What great information. The sn on the 58 is 1154888 which according to my info is a 1958. I wonder if I just have a cowling from a 59 on a 1958 motor? Also the number on the Mark 55 is 899000 but appears to have a standard bendix style starter and toothed fly wheel. It was obviously rebuilt sometime in the last ten years or so and so the sn may not be a true indication of what I have. I have looked for serial numbers on the block but so far I have not found any. The mag is a FM and my manual is so general it is hard to judge what has been updated and what has not. I will be careful not to stray into another forum main category and talk about maintenance. I hope I am wrong about the 58A and do indeed wish it to be a 59 as I would hope it is indeed a worthy restoration to come as a special edition. It has not been touched as far as I can tell and may be a very good candidate for restoration. I will get it in the shop next week and take a closer look as it has been sitting around for a lot of years.
 

Chinewalker

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Aug 19, 2001
Messages
8,902
Re: Is it worth it? 1955 Mark 55

Hi Ron,<br /> The '59 wasn't so much a "special edition" as it was merely noting the 20th anniversary. Nothing really special about the '59s other than that was the first year of the "square top" motors. If the 58A has a rounded "turtle back" top like that on your Mark 55, then it's a '58 (or earlier). In 1958 they made a Mark 58 (no A) which was mechanically pretty much the same as the Mark 58A, save for an improved recoil housed in the new square top. The serial number on your 58A does indeed come back as a '58. It was not uncommon to replace the recoil housing and face plate, as the '58 and prior Merc recoils weren't noted for their perfection - at least from a functional standpoint. Your Mark 55 comes in as a late 1955 model, which might explain why it has the updated starter motor. Do keep in mind that your motors have nearly 50-years of history behind them - you never know what you'll find out! I've had motors with parts from four identifiably seperate parts motors all glommed together into one. The old adage "you can't judge a book by its cover" holds true.<br /><br /> One standy ID trick for the four-cylinder Mercs. On the side of the block, next to the fuel pumps there should be an embossed area with "Turbo Four", "Thunderbolt" or "Super-Thunderbolt". The Turbo Four is the 30-cube block, the Thunderbolt is the 40 cuber, and the Super Thunderbolt is the 44-cuber - always.<br /><br />- Scott
 

rons boat

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Dec 28, 2002
Messages
210
Re: Is it worth it? 1955 Mark 55

I believe it to be a square top that you describe. Also I notice a vent in the top rear cowl of the 58A that is not on the earlier 55 motor. Tis a mystery about the sn and the 58A thing unless this is 58A cowl on a 58. Thanks everybody Ron
 
Top