Re: Jet Boats.....
You'll find that inboard jets (like Merc. Sport jet or a V6 or V8 engine with a modern jet pump) are getting pretty efficient nowadays.<br /><br />I've owned two boats with jet power. One, a Jetcraft with a Chevy 351 (5.7) "Kodiak" conversion and a jet pump. I liked the whole rig for operation, but the big V8 took up too much interior space, and the rig was two unforgiving in real shallow water (which is the reason to have a jet imho). This pump just was hard to clear of debris and the rig was too heavy to push off a bar. I didn't think the fuel efficiency was too horrible for the speed it would produce. It burned about 8 gph at 30 or so MPH - more than three MPG, which I think is good.<br /><br />I now have a larger hull with a big V6 Johnson outboard with an aftermarket jet lower unit. This thing is very inefficient when it comes to power and thus gas consumption. It loses, I think, about 25% or more in power. Therefore, for a given load and speed, you need to run the rpms higher. The gallons burned per hour for a given RPM stay the same, but you go 25% less far. I'm lucky to get 2 MPG with this rig. The advantages are: the outboard jet is really easy to work on, once you learn it. It is also easy to clear of debris when needed (again- this is why one has a jet in the first place, to push the envelope on depth, etc.). In my boat, it is much, much easier to steer at low speed compared to the inboard - could be hull, could be engine, but bottome line is it is easier to maneuver.<br /><br />In spite of the fuel issues, I prefer the outboard jet quite a bit for shallow water exploring. For more cruising in not so shallow water, the inboard would be my choice - faster, more comfortable, can be quite a bit quieter, and more efficient. The interior space is always an issue with an I/O or inboard - you just need to have a fairly long (>20 ft) and wide (>6 ft floor), imho, to make it work well.