Re: jet drive or i/o
Dont care what you guys say, they use a LOT more fuel then an I/O even when the motors are comparable.
which jets have you owned?
At least for the jets i've owned, they are VERY similar in fuel consumption to their prop equivilents.
I've had 5 jet power craft, 95hp, 120hp, 130hp (2), and 175hp. All were 2 strokes, and all had VERY similar consumption compared to a 2 stroke outboard of similar year. Yes, if you compare a 2 stroke jet to a modern 4 stroke outboard, there is going to be a difference.
For the record, i've also owned somewhere north of 10 different outboard powered craft, as well as 5 jet powered, so i've got experience on both sides of the fence. Answer my first question on which jets you have owned and then compare them...
Anyway, in case anyone is wondering about actual facts instead of hearsay... My current jet boat, 17 feet LOA and powered by a merc 175hp 2 stroke, and will consume 20 gallons per hour at WOT. It will also do around 55 mph.
Lets compare that to a random similar I/O. Larson 180 with a 190 hp I/O. It goes slightly slower (49.7 mph) and consumes 18.1 gph. Both boats are rated for 6 people. So a nearly 10 year old 2 stroke compared to a 3 year old 4 stroke I/O, and there is only about a 10% difference in economy... Not too bad in my book!
http://www.boattest.com/boats/Boat_video.aspx?ID=1199#Test-Result
http://www.boattest.com/boats/test_results_PrintP-e-oem.aspx?id=46