merc 888 (or general engine question)

mrdjflores

Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Messages
1,169
question....
why are most of the ford, chevy based I/O setups use a manual flywheel??
i know for the ford engines, it can't be for the engine weight balance...the early engines were externally balanced (28 oz) and they have manual and automatic flywheels that are 28 oz balanced...

someone asked me this and it has be puzzled....

anyone know of a good reason why manual flywheels?
 

achris

More fish than mountain goat
Joined
May 19, 2004
Messages
27,468
Re: merc 888 (or general engine question)

The clue is in the name, 'flywheel'. An engine will not run well without one. A flywheel is not there just to balance the engine, it helps the engine run smoothly. Cars with slushboxes have a drive plate bolted to the crankshaft, not a flywheel, the slushbox torque converter is bolted to the drive plate, and that has sufficient mass to act as the flywheel.

Chris......
 

mrdjflores

Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Messages
1,169
Re: merc 888 (or general engine question)

thats the best explanation i have heard....but it seams that the mass and torgue of the drive spinning in the water would provide enough mass to compensate
 

Don S

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Aug 31, 2004
Messages
62,321
Re: merc 888 (or general engine question)

The water works at trying to stop the prop from moving. If you was not moving and the drive was in gear and the prop was spinning, almost immediately on putting the drive in neutral the prop will stop moving.
With all the gear changes of direction, bearing preloads and friction in the drive, there is no mass to act as a flywheel.
Everthing from the crankshaft to the crank attempts to stop the engine. Except the mass of the flywheel.

I would bet that without the flywheel, the engine would probably die when first put into gear.
 

RogersJetboat454

Commander
Joined
Jul 9, 2010
Messages
2,964
Re: merc 888 (or general engine question)

thats the best explanation i have heard....but it seams that the mass and torgue of the drive spinning in the water would provide enough mass to compensate

I'm guessing you meant to say prop?

By that logic, a car with a manual transmission shouldn't need a heavy flywheel because the wheel's have enough mass to keep the engine spinning. Problems with that logic; What happens when you put it in neutral? What happens when you put it in gear? How much more likely is the engine going to stall when the interrupter switch bumps the ignition off for a moment? Your engine needs it's flywheel to maintain a good idle, and help it through the initial bump of a load, or momentary loss of ignition.
 

achris

More fish than mountain goat
Joined
May 19, 2004
Messages
27,468
Re: merc 888 (or general engine question)

thats the best explanation i have heard....but it seams that the mass and torgue of the drive spinning in the water would provide enough mass to compensate

The prop spinning in the water is a load, not a mass..

A load is trying to stop the engine, a mass is trying to keep it running.
 

stackz

Master Chief Petty Officer
Joined
May 29, 2008
Messages
830
Re: merc 888 (or general engine question)

pretty much what everyone else says but you also need something for the starter to engage unless you want to try to pull start the engine which would suck unless you're hercules :p
 

mrdjflores

Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Messages
1,169
Re: merc 888 (or general engine question)

on an interesting note....my engine specs:
block is a 69
heads are 70 (1970 351W to be precise - 60cc chamber, 1.85 int valves, 1.54 ext)
manual flywheel is stamped C6ZE (66 mustang)
bought a regular 73 truck manual flywheel for $25 and sold my mustang one for $249...hahaha
 
Top