Re: Piston travel question
And that's why longer rods require less timing advance than shorter ones.
To expand a bit: In order to produce the most power, an engine requires the fuel/air mixture to burn approximately the same time before TDC and after TDC, Since gasoline takes a finite time to burn, as the engine speeds up, the mixture must be ignited earlier. Since with longer rods, the piston stops for a very slightly longer time at top dead center, there is slightly more time to burn, so less timing advance is needed to have an equal burn before and after TDC. (only about a degree or two though)
AND: That's why Chrysler and Force engines require 32 or 30 degrees advance. When the engines were first designed, the pistons had three rings and two needle bearings carrying the wrist pin. This necessitated moving the wrist pin hole down in the piston skirt and using a short rod. They (Chrysler and later US Marine and Mercury) never changed the design even after they went to two rings and needle bearings in the rod small end.
To my knowledge, the only Force engines to use longer rods is the Mercury built Force 70 and 75. While I don't particularly like those engines, I must admit they run well.
The Chrysler 55,60, and 65 was a new design which used long rods and (for the period) cutting edge design. These engines were very powerful and robust. Unfortunately, Chrysler put a substandard lower unit on them. The engines were so strong that it was quite easy to strip the lower unit gears if under propped.
And I have prattled on enough.