ovnic1234
Seaman
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2008
- Messages
- 69
Hello,
I have two 50's era motors, one a 52' Bigtwin and a 55-56 7.5hp Aquasonic. The 52' I just picked up and someone had already converted it with the fuel pump mounted to the bypass cover, which looks like it came off a later model Johnson (green). The 7.5 I converted by removing the check valves and blocking off one of the channels so that the pulse and vacuum of one cylinder didn't cancel the other.
Is this just a matter of preference? I can't visualize why one would be a better choice. Does heat play a factor in shortening the lifespan of the fuel pump being mounted on the bypass cover so close to where all the action is (combustion)?
Note: Great cowling on the 25hp, very practical design team Evinrude. 10+ screws plus some spark plug hood which of course is missing. I imagine there are a lot of them in watery graves. Next stop ebay.
I have two 50's era motors, one a 52' Bigtwin and a 55-56 7.5hp Aquasonic. The 52' I just picked up and someone had already converted it with the fuel pump mounted to the bypass cover, which looks like it came off a later model Johnson (green). The 7.5 I converted by removing the check valves and blocking off one of the channels so that the pulse and vacuum of one cylinder didn't cancel the other.
Is this just a matter of preference? I can't visualize why one would be a better choice. Does heat play a factor in shortening the lifespan of the fuel pump being mounted on the bypass cover so close to where all the action is (combustion)?
Note: Great cowling on the 25hp, very practical design team Evinrude. 10+ screws plus some spark plug hood which of course is missing. I imagine there are a lot of them in watery graves. Next stop ebay.