Re: runabout vs. Ski/wakeboard boat differences
Originally posted by tommays:<br /> I/O BOATS have a very difficult time maintaining WAKEBOARD speeds.
tommays,<br /><br />I am very reluctant to disagree with you as you have more experience with tournament type boats. And let me say I have always wanted a Barefoot Sanger and I have always wanted a Mastercraft direct drive and I love the v-drives too. Basically I love all boats, so my opinion is carp

<br /><br />Anyway, I don't agree . . .
if the boat has adjustable trim tabs. It is unfreaking believable what combos I can come up with by using both the tabs and the trim. I can dig the biggest, slowest (14 mph) hole you can imagine and maintain it. I can also flatten it out for water skiing. Neither as good as a tournament boat, but that boat would have to have bags to match me.<br /><br />In my opinion this is about how much of a priority the watersports are, and what the water conditions are like where you boat. If you ever beach your boat you should seriously consider that issue as well. I also think the I/O or modern OB will get better fuel economy, but that to me is the least of your concerns as it would probably mean a difference of around $5 - $10 a weekend. I'll probably get some stuff thrown at me for this one . . . A 20 ft. OB or I/O with 175 horsepower will probably outrun a 250 bhp inboard of similar weight etc.<br /><br />Hole shot, there is no comparison, the inboard wins hands down. My .02