Pretty sure I'm not classified as stupid...

I even manage to usually fill out my posts with capitalization, actual sentences, and even punctuation! (95% of the board can't even accomplish that...)
I'm not talking some 1970's open engine jet boat with a big block v8 and a berkeley in back. You submarine one of those and its going straight to the bottom. And yes, someone could even put a jet outboard on a bayliner capri, but most bayliner owners don't need any help sinking their own boat... The op was talking about a youtube submarine video, so I'm fairly sure we all can safely assume what it was...
I'm talking a modern jet (seadoo/sugar sand), which IS built for that. Again, the inner cockpit sole is sealed from the outer hull. There are two bilge pumps that drain the cockpit area only. They do not drain into the outer hull, those bilges pump directly overboard. (I can draw a diagram if you need one...) I can literally take a garden hose and fill the boat up until its running over, and other than some wet speakers, NOTHING is affected. The engine runs fine, there is still enough freeboard, and all you have to do is sit and wait for the pumps to suck it out.
I've got a pic below from a modern jet interior. You can see how the inner hull is sealed, there simply is no opening that leads to the air space in between hulls. The most water I've had from a submarine had me sitting in water. Gauges/controls stayed dry, speakers got wet. Even at full capacity, the gauges/switches would stay dry. (the nose is a little lower, so you could never fill it to the gunwals in back)
So... given all that information, why is that a stupid move?