lots of boats
Petty Officer 2nd Class
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2008
- Messages
- 116
Official Recall Notification for all Nissan, and Tohatsu 70hp and 90hp series TLDI models.
This notification was issued in June this year because of the extreme risk of fire from the failure of a high pressure fuel component due to abrasion against other parts. This particular recal has number, 08-003 but I don't know how to use the document that I received to track the history or effect of the problem, and although it applies to a problem that has been well known for a long time, there is no way to find out how Nissan/Tohatsu decided to distribute this notification. I would like to know why they decided to put out this bulletin now, as opposed to three years ago or next year.
My question, which I think applies to the entire forum is: Is this type of notification, common, given the heading "U.S. Federal Boat Safety Act" and is it just the equivalent to a service bulletin, where it is up to the customer to decide whether the cost and time are worth the trouble of doing the repair. Or, on the other hand, does the corporation have a legal responsabilty to see that the repairs are made by compensating the customer for time and transportation costs to take a motor to a dealer?
Thanks.
This notification was issued in June this year because of the extreme risk of fire from the failure of a high pressure fuel component due to abrasion against other parts. This particular recal has number, 08-003 but I don't know how to use the document that I received to track the history or effect of the problem, and although it applies to a problem that has been well known for a long time, there is no way to find out how Nissan/Tohatsu decided to distribute this notification. I would like to know why they decided to put out this bulletin now, as opposed to three years ago or next year.
My question, which I think applies to the entire forum is: Is this type of notification, common, given the heading "U.S. Federal Boat Safety Act" and is it just the equivalent to a service bulletin, where it is up to the customer to decide whether the cost and time are worth the trouble of doing the repair. Or, on the other hand, does the corporation have a legal responsabilty to see that the repairs are made by compensating the customer for time and transportation costs to take a motor to a dealer?
Thanks.
Last edited: