Re: V6mpi vs. carb V8 question
I have owned a boat with a 5.0 carb and it was great. My present boat has MPI and I don't think it's all that much better. Still stalls on occasion and runs rich when cold, just like the carb engine.<br /><br />The weight difference betwwen the 4.3 and the 5.0 is shockingly small. Well under 100 lbs if memory serves. This makes sense when you consider they are basically the same engine, the only difference being the weight of the two added cylinders. All the bolt on accessories and such, as well as the drive, are the same.<br /><br />Fuel injection is awesome in applications where there is a need to operate in wide temperature variations, with small throttle openings much of the time, and at varying elevations. That's why it works so well in your car Summer and Winter, gets great mileage (compared to old carb engines), and does not struggle when elevation changes. <br /><br />Carbs are best used in narrow temperature variations, with large throttle openings, and at constant elevation. Carbs are perfectly suited to recreational boats and the fuel consumption between carbs and FI in a boat is negligible. Is FI better? Of course, but the differences are so minor that they are not nearly worth the added cost up front if you intend to keep the boat. Unfortunately, it's harder to sell a used boat with a carb so the resale could take a hit. <br /><br />Here's a little secret Mercruiser would rather not share: that 5.0 engine will make about 250 to 260HP with a 4 bbl carb and intake manifold ($600 or so). They put small 2bbl carbs on them to keep them from making the same power as the 5.0 MPI engine. The difference is even better on a 5.7 liter engine. Boating magazine did a test a couple of years ago and spent $600 on a 4bbl carb, 4bbl intake manifold, and K&N flame arrestor for a merc 5.7 engine. The boat gained 6 MPH on the top end, the same top speed it would do with the 5.7 MPI.