Re: What's the quality difference
The guy does have his opinions, that's for sure, but he brings up points that make sense. The article on cores in hull bottoms was interesting. The way he rips on things is sort of funny. I find it kind of curious that he mentions Bayliner and Sea Ray as being some of the most popular and biggest selling boats in the U.S., but does no reviews of Bayliner.?<br />Talk is cheap, but when he backs it up with photos it's hard to argue against. The hurricane report is from 2000 and even though the age of the boats is unknown, if Sea Ray peddled obvious crap as is shown, at a time when oil and it's products were cheap, they have more 'splaining to do than Lucy before I would trust them to build a solid boat as compared to a profitable boat. <br />David Pascoe might come off as being a negative person, but he is basically a surveyor and not a salesman. His main job is not to sell you on the good things but to point out the bad things, and that sort of carries into his 'reviews'. But basically he is just the messenger, he didn't build the boats but he sees the shortcomings and reports them. By reading what he says about the problems of boats, you can not only get an idea what to look for in a used boat, you get a very good idea of what to look for in a new boat as well. Attention to unseen detail is a sign of quality. Kicking the tires of a car might not tell you much, but kicking the side of a boat can be informative. <br />But like you, until the lottery or my efforts to convince Bill Gates that I really am an illegitimate offspring of his come through, the closest I come to Sea Ray is buying some kind of boat from Sea Rs Roebuck. Sam