Yamaha Jet Boat

Dave-R

Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
441
I see a lot of these for sale around these parts, and I like a lot of the things they can do. I did notice the used ones seem to be a lot cheaper than I-Os . Does the high rpm of the engines relate to short engine life. Having never owned one, I thought maybe to ask some of you for your opinions. Thanks Dave-R
 

H20Rat

Vice Admiral
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
5,204
What year? Old yamaha jetboats are entirely different animals than the much larger new ones. (the old mid 90's/early 00's were during the jet boat craze era, the newer ones are nice traditional bowriders that just happen to have a jet prop. And engine RPM doesn't have much to do with life, my yamaha 4 stroke snowmobiles will rev over 10,000 rpm, and will outlast any 2 stroke on the planet. 10,000 miles isn't unheard of.
 

MH Hawker

Vice Admiral
Joined
Jul 13, 2011
Messages
5,516
haven't sean many around here but id class them the same as a jet flea
 

H20Rat

Vice Admiral
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
5,204
haven't sean many around here but id class them the same as a jet flea

huh?

The smallest jet boat yamaha makes is 19'. Largest is a '24 class which is well over 25' LOA. Seats 12, weighs 4000 pounds, and starts at $68,000. They also make center console versions of their hulls up to 21'.

Not really sure how your jet flea comparison is valid.

https://www.yamahaboats.com/24-ft-bo...ed-s-e-series/
 
Last edited:

QBhoy

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Mar 10, 2016
Messages
8,348
If older...likely to be 2 stroke jet ski engine. These engines don't last long in a jet ski and a rebuild every 200hrs is about standard.
They are worked much harder in a jet boat and in my opinion should be avoided. All good fun...until they blow up for whatever reason.
That said...if she has been well looked after, not hammered and the oil injection disconnected for pre mix...it might last 300hrs !
 

Leardriver

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Oct 7, 2008
Messages
380
The newer ones like the SX230 are super high quality boats. The engines run like a Honda Accord.
 

QBhoy

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Mar 10, 2016
Messages
8,348
The newer ones like the SX230 are super high quality boats. The engines run like a Honda Accord.

I'm sure they do...terrible on fuel though in comparison to a lower revving stern drive. Great fun I'd imagine.
 

QBhoy

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Mar 10, 2016
Messages
8,348
And probably a bit down on performance to an equivalent horsepower stern drive. They have their place though !
 

Toyelectroman

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Dec 20, 2016
Messages
201
Friend has a yamaha, few things different than a stern drive. When steering in a no wake zonr he has to think 5 seconds ahead of where he wants to turn, also there is no neutral, but what i am reall jealous is how shallow of water he can go into
 

jkust

Rear Admiral
Joined
Aug 2, 2008
Messages
4,942
It's funny, the jet boats, the contemporary ones mentioned above, just never caught on out on my lake. There is I believe one on the lake and happens to be the 24 foot class. Even Chaparral has been making them for a few years using the Sea Doo engines but no takers around me. I have a supercharged waverunner and is the funnest thing I own, it gets 90% of the use and the rest of our boats just sit. It drinks gas so badly that I keep waiting for the global warming police to show up at my door which I assume will be Canadians when they do finally find me. I can't imagine a full size boat that has a less powerful engine than my waverunner or worse twins whether they be supercharged or not....I'd have to be filling it up daily with half a dozen cans of gas on my dock. I can't stress enough how much gas an 850lb supercharged waverunner uses and so a full size bowrider I imagine would be even worse if that is even possible. As for the whole shallow water thing, you can putter over shallow water but you will vacuum up the bottom if you take off from the shallows. Yamaha has sort of corrected their slow speed steering issues but generally as mentioned, you have to make your move ahead of time for the boat to react how you want at the point you need.
The jet boats do seem to depreciate faster. To me a jet boat would be a novelty or a great third or fourth boat on a lift in front of your place after the pontoon, wakeboat and fishing boat.
 

Scott Danforth

Grumpy Vintage Moderator still playing with boats
Staff member
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
50,233
jet boats and fuel economy are on opposite ends of the spectrum
 

QBhoy

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Mar 10, 2016
Messages
8,348
Both above very true. They seem to be quite in efficient from an engineering point of view...if you compare a scarab or seadoo 255hp 18/20ft jet boat with a 18/20ft stern drive 5.0 mpi Merc. Really high revving wee 1.8l 4 pot engines. Surely they can't last that long given their normal use ? The big V8 makes 260hp without breaking sweat...the poor wee 1.8 is tuned to within an inch of its life to make 255hp.
If we look at the boattest.com reviews of these boats the figures are crazy. Some quote best cruise at 4700 rpm and about 40 litres per hour give or take. And over 100 litres per hour flat out. That's more than the big 8.1 litre HO mercs !!!
 

QBhoy

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Mar 10, 2016
Messages
8,348
Also a fair bit down on speed too in comparison. My wee boat would murder the vast majority, if not all of them.
It's certainly the case with the wee 16ft scarab with 255hp....having been up against one. You would think such a light boat with that hp would be rapid. He was lucky if he was doing mid 50's GPs
 

jkust

Rear Admiral
Joined
Aug 2, 2008
Messages
4,942
Interesting is sea doo has to tweetk their 3 cylinders to match the 4 cylinder yamahas. In other words Yamaha doesn't work as hard because it is a larger engine that has been detuned. Yamaha's reputation for their 4 cylinder jet engine reliability is no mystery vs sea Doos historical issues and strict preventative maintenance schedule and mandatory supercharger rebuild vs yamahas lifetime supercharger.
 
Top