eeboater
Commander
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2004
- Messages
- 2,644
Here's an interesting topic for discussion. For everyone who does not know, I work in the mortgage industry. If you have bought a house before you know that there are a million steps involved in the purchase. One of them is the home inspection.
About 2 years ago, one of our employees (Jeff) quit and started a Home Inspection company. Jeff has been coming into our branch, handing out flyers, etc, trying to get business from our company. One of the loan officers (Tom) has been sending him a decent amount of business... about 10-12 inspections over the last year. Unfortunately, Jeff has not been able to reciprocate - which is understandable because he meets his customers AFTER they have already established a relationship with a bank.
Well, two weeks ago, Tom found a house he likes and started the process of purchasing it. He asked Jeff to do the inspection for him because of the working relationship they have established. Last night, Jeff and Tom were at the house getting the inspection done. When the inspection was complete, Jeff asked for $325 for the inspection. Jeff usually charges $275 for the inspection, but Tom needed a Radon test, so Jeff added $50 to the final price.
Here's the topic for debate.
Was it a dumb move on Jeff's part to charge Tom the full price for his home inspection? Would it have been smarter for him to charge enough to just cover his costs because of the referrals he has been receiving from Tom? Tom has now decided he will never send an inspection his way again. Is it wrong/arrogant for Tom to assume he would get a break on the inspection after all the referrals he made?
What do you think?
About 2 years ago, one of our employees (Jeff) quit and started a Home Inspection company. Jeff has been coming into our branch, handing out flyers, etc, trying to get business from our company. One of the loan officers (Tom) has been sending him a decent amount of business... about 10-12 inspections over the last year. Unfortunately, Jeff has not been able to reciprocate - which is understandable because he meets his customers AFTER they have already established a relationship with a bank.
Well, two weeks ago, Tom found a house he likes and started the process of purchasing it. He asked Jeff to do the inspection for him because of the working relationship they have established. Last night, Jeff and Tom were at the house getting the inspection done. When the inspection was complete, Jeff asked for $325 for the inspection. Jeff usually charges $275 for the inspection, but Tom needed a Radon test, so Jeff added $50 to the final price.
Here's the topic for debate.
Was it a dumb move on Jeff's part to charge Tom the full price for his home inspection? Would it have been smarter for him to charge enough to just cover his costs because of the referrals he has been receiving from Tom? Tom has now decided he will never send an inspection his way again. Is it wrong/arrogant for Tom to assume he would get a break on the inspection after all the referrals he made?
What do you think?