There are only 2 rear end options on the Tahoe, 3.08 and 3.42. With the 3.08, the rating is 5100lbs.
Not going to hurt anything to at least try it.
But, I'll stand by my original statement. Not so much because it would be sluggish (though it may be), it's because of strain.
3.04 ratio allows much more strain on things like tranny, mounts, U-joints, bearings, etc. also makes the engine work harder and may encourage issues latter down the road. Nothing exciting right away though.
My comment may not matter if you're only hauling once or twice a year. But if it lives on the trailer and tends to make frequent trips I still think it'll shorten the life of a new anything over a relatively small amount of time (as compared to not).
My reasoning is from towing a lot of trailers of different types over many years. (but things change too)
I have the 6 speed in a k2500 pulling 6200 lbs. and using the tow/haul button, I just let it do it's thing. It's an Allison trans, durable as hell and I wouldn't worry about it so much...
Not true. Pulling air past a nearly closed throttle is a waste of energy. Sometimes this is good (like when you gear down on a steep downhill grade), but usually the higher the vacuum, the less efficiently your engine is operating. This is why cylinder deactivation works - turn a V8 operating at high vacuum into a 4-cylinder operating at low vacuum and you get the same power output with less fuel input. Alternatively, operating at lower vacuum and lower RPM will use less fuel for the same power output than operating at higher vacuum and higher RPM. The only exception is when the engine computer retards timing or adds more fuel at WOT to prevent knocking.I suppose this is another of those threads that could go on forever but my point about such high gearing is that while deep first and even second gears is essential to get you moving, once moving, that axle ratio is just as important to maintain high engine vacuum which translates directly to economy.
But you have those deeper gears with the 6-speed transmission. A high top gear to keep the engine speed (and vacuum) down when you don't need much power, lower gears to let the engine rev up when you need more power, and close enough spacing to prevent "flat spots". Heavy trucks have had a dozen or more gears for decades - pickups and SUVs are finally starting to catch up.Using your 3.21 vs a 3.08 gear as an example. That represents a fairly significant difference in power delivery to the rear wheels. Newer vehicles also tend to run much larger tires than trucks did in the past so that is another factor that alters effective axle ratio. HP, axle ratio, terrain and truck useage all must play together in order to optimize the balance between performance and fuel economy. This boils down to how much towing one does and the terrain where one must use the vehicle the most. If you live in Kansas or Nebraska for example, 3.08 gears in truck that doesn't tow anything might work fine and get great fuel economy. Hook up a horse trailer or similar and you would beg for deeper gears.
Sounds like the spacing between OD and the next gear down was too big. More gears = closer spacing = less annoying when the tranny does it's thing and shifts in response to changing power demands.Even strong headwinds affect performance and it is magnified by high gearing. One of the most annoying trips I ever made was driving my brothers Toyota Highlander to Colorado. On even the slightest grades the tranny would not stay put and even my wife commented if something was wrong with this vehicle. I had to drive less than the 75 MPH posted speed in Nebraska because this vehicle would not stay in top gear and it reved like nuts out of OD. Needless to say this vehicle is not an economy champ either. Big difference in vehicles to be sure but the concepts still apply. No vehicle I've ever owned behaved so poorly.
dock, I just want to make sure you know, the 6 speed in the 1500s with the gas engines is NOT an Allison, it's a 6L80E GM transmission.