Lou C
Supreme Mariner
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2002
- Messages
- 13,200
we don't know exactly how it's plumbed because most of us have older boats that did not have this system. However, anyone who has had any experience with winterizing cast iron engines, knows that when cast iron rusts (and fresh water guys yes it rusts in fresh water too) it flakes off unlike aluminum, and those flakes will clog drain holes. So when Merc came up with this system, which cannot be easily rodded out unless you disconnect the hoses from the block and manifold drains, it seemed like a BAD idea unlikely to work for more than a couple of years.
It all comes back to the same thing, inboards should be closed cooled, at least a half system. What Merc did was jury rig this foolish system, bound to clog, all to avoid a simple heat exchanger. This is why I'd never buy a late model I/O. This is bad and cheap engineering, nothing more complex than that. You have closed cooling, you can simply hook up the winterizing tank, with an livewell or bilge pump to pressurize it, and then your raw water hoses, impeller, raw water side of your heat exchanger, etc are full of antifreeze. No pulling out seats, straining your back to reach buried drain plugs, etc etc. Take a look at how many hoses are on a simple Volvo half system, vs this confused collection of hoses, plastic fittings etc. The closed half system has nothing more than a heat exchanger, a new thermostat housing, and about 5 hoses depending on the application. Longer lasting engine, easy to winterize, simple design.
Just say NO to Mercruiser's foolishness and ridiculous cost cutting. I bet if you totaled up the cost of the hoses, plastic parts, distribution housings etc, its only a few hundred cheaper than an aftermarket closed half system.
Even though they are the market leader, some of their engineering and product planning is quite lacking in my opinion.
It all comes back to the same thing, inboards should be closed cooled, at least a half system. What Merc did was jury rig this foolish system, bound to clog, all to avoid a simple heat exchanger. This is why I'd never buy a late model I/O. This is bad and cheap engineering, nothing more complex than that. You have closed cooling, you can simply hook up the winterizing tank, with an livewell or bilge pump to pressurize it, and then your raw water hoses, impeller, raw water side of your heat exchanger, etc are full of antifreeze. No pulling out seats, straining your back to reach buried drain plugs, etc etc. Take a look at how many hoses are on a simple Volvo half system, vs this confused collection of hoses, plastic fittings etc. The closed half system has nothing more than a heat exchanger, a new thermostat housing, and about 5 hoses depending on the application. Longer lasting engine, easy to winterize, simple design.
Just say NO to Mercruiser's foolishness and ridiculous cost cutting. I bet if you totaled up the cost of the hoses, plastic parts, distribution housings etc, its only a few hundred cheaper than an aftermarket closed half system.
Even though they are the market leader, some of their engineering and product planning is quite lacking in my opinion.