1959 35hp Flywheel torque?

Aesculus

Cadet
Thread starter
Joined
Jun 25, 2004
Messages
16
Torque has been stated as 105 foot lbs here, but my new SELOC repair manual lists "720-780 inch/lb" which would be 60-65 foot pounds. That is for 1957-59 35HP. The 33hp and 40hp in the 1960's have the 105 ft/lb spec.<br /><br />If there weren't such a big difference I wouldn't be concerned, but it sounds like this is an important spec. Do I need another service manual?
 

petrolhead

Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Oct 16, 2003
Messages
614
Re: 1959 35hp Flywheel torque?

I think your manual is right, I see 105lb quoted a lot here, and for most of the other large twins that's right, but for the majority of engines it's less.<br />I was surprised to see that my 18hp needed just 45lbs, having seen 105lbs mentioned so often I just assumed that was the correct torque for all the engines, regardless of size.<br />I find the Seloc to be a very good manual, apart from the odd typo and a few ambiguous statements it's quite easy to understand and follow the procedures.
 

rolmops

Vice Admiral
Joined
Feb 24, 2002
Messages
5,751
Re: 1959 35hp Flywheel torque?

Hello Burgie<br />I just checked in the specs book and your 1959 should go with the "720-780 inch/lbs".
 

Aesculus

Cadet
Thread starter
Joined
Jun 25, 2004
Messages
16
Re: 1959 35hp Flywheel torque?

Originally posted by rolmops:<br /> Hello Burgie<br />I just checked in the specs book and your 1959 should go with the "720-780 inch/lbs".
Thanks for the backup on this. I'm going with the book.
 

Aesculus

Cadet
Thread starter
Joined
Jun 25, 2004
Messages
16
Re: 1959 35hp Flywheel torque?

Originally posted by petrolhead:<br /> I think your manual is right, I see 105lb quoted a lot here, and for most of the other large twins that's right, but for the majority of engines it's less.<br />I was surprised to see that my 18hp needed just 45lbs, having seen 105lbs mentioned so often I just assumed that was the correct torque for all the engines, regardless of size.<br />I find the Seloc to be a very good manual, apart from the odd typo and a few ambiguous statements it's quite easy to understand and follow the procedures.
:)
 

Aesculus

Cadet
Thread starter
Joined
Jun 25, 2004
Messages
16
Re: 1959 35hp Flywheel torque?

Petrolhead: Thanks for your input. I feel better about the manual, too. It does have typos, but I'm glad you find info good stuff. Later. Burg
 
Top