sumocomputers
Petty Officer 2nd Class
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2015
- Messages
- 123
I have a 1989 Johnson 70, and the charging voltage at the cranking battery is about 16.5 volts at idle with just the flushing ears hooked up.
1. I want to connect my cranking battery and my house battery together with a battery switch, and want them both to be able to charge when the engine is running.
2. I also want to make sure that my instruments, fish finder, etc. don't get too high voltage, avoiding damage. Right now I am afraid that 16.5 volts would damage them. Right now we just ghetto-rig them to the house battery, and charge it in the garage with a plug in charger. In other words we have 2 separate battery circuits.
I see that CDI offers a rectifier/regulator part # 193-3408, linked in this post.
http://www.cdielectronics.com/produ...5708-9-17200-9-17200-9-17200-9-17200-9-17200/
My hope is that installing it would bring my charging voltage down to a safe level. My question is if getting the CDI part will accomplish what I want. The CDI instructions still say not to use a maintenance-free battery, and I am not sure if either of my batteries fall into this category. I have included links to both of my batteries below.
I found a thread on continouswave (http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum6/HTML/002256.html) where it is suggested to use a couple of later model BRP official rectifiers (one air cooled, the other water cooled), but I am not sure if this is preferable to something like the CDI. The CDI is certainly cheaper, and is supposed to be a match. The BRP seems like tribal knowledge.
I have the official service manual, and it tells you how to check the rectifier, but I don't see anything in there that tells me what the voltage should actually be when engine is running, and the specifications for the battery type are sort of generic. Again, my main concern is damaging things like fish finder, etc.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks,
Chris
Here is a photo of the cranking battery I have:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/mbpejp3ltdsg22e/2015-02-23 15.00.19.jpg

Here is the house battery I have:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/4ybxrqwyje1i1aw/2015-02-23 15.01.24.jpg

1. I want to connect my cranking battery and my house battery together with a battery switch, and want them both to be able to charge when the engine is running.
2. I also want to make sure that my instruments, fish finder, etc. don't get too high voltage, avoiding damage. Right now I am afraid that 16.5 volts would damage them. Right now we just ghetto-rig them to the house battery, and charge it in the garage with a plug in charger. In other words we have 2 separate battery circuits.
I see that CDI offers a rectifier/regulator part # 193-3408, linked in this post.
http://www.cdielectronics.com/produ...5708-9-17200-9-17200-9-17200-9-17200-9-17200/
My hope is that installing it would bring my charging voltage down to a safe level. My question is if getting the CDI part will accomplish what I want. The CDI instructions still say not to use a maintenance-free battery, and I am not sure if either of my batteries fall into this category. I have included links to both of my batteries below.
I found a thread on continouswave (http://continuouswave.com/ubb/Forum6/HTML/002256.html) where it is suggested to use a couple of later model BRP official rectifiers (one air cooled, the other water cooled), but I am not sure if this is preferable to something like the CDI. The CDI is certainly cheaper, and is supposed to be a match. The BRP seems like tribal knowledge.
I have the official service manual, and it tells you how to check the rectifier, but I don't see anything in there that tells me what the voltage should actually be when engine is running, and the specifications for the battery type are sort of generic. Again, my main concern is damaging things like fish finder, etc.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks,
Chris
Here is a photo of the cranking battery I have:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/mbpejp3ltdsg22e/2015-02-23 15.00.19.jpg

Here is the house battery I have:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/4ybxrqwyje1i1aw/2015-02-23 15.01.24.jpg
