305 Block

jtybt

Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Aug 5, 2009
Messages
730
Re: 305 Block

:eek:

Well I guess a small CFM carb just ain't gonna flow at 8500 RPM:eek:


How do you get an SBC to turn 8500 RPM???

I had a 283 in a '57 chebby..:redface:
 

dr_bowtie

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
281
Re: 305 Block

:eek:

Well I guess a small CFM carb just ain't gonna flow at 8500 RPM:eek:


How do you get an SBC to turn 8500 RPM???

I had a 283 in a '57 chebby..:redface:

the cam is the brains...;)

a 283 with a little 230 dur @ .050 will hit 8,000rpm pretty easy...the short stroke is what does it...it just doesnt make any power after 6500..lol

mine was in a 57 belair as well now it resides in a 87 Monte that is giving way to a stroked 327 that make 785hp....(13.5:1 compression)

Ok I think we hi-jacked this thread enough...;)

I wasnt going to post in it but I just had to to set teh record straight...:)
 

Bifflefan

Commander
Joined
May 27, 2009
Messages
2,933
Re: 305 Block

But then again no one had the guts to mod a Q-Jet to do the things I do with them...;)

Just a point of order, about 25ish years ago i sent a Q/Jet to a guy in Cali.
I sent the carb, and all the specs of the car and motor to him.
He charged me about 150 (I think),when i got it back it was the most amazing thing anyone had even seen run.
You may have heard of him,,,, Barry Grant..:eek:
He used to build a MEAN Q/Jet
 

dr_bowtie

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
281
Re: 305 Block

Ayuh,... I Agree,... Excellent post Dr....
I with you up to that line,+ you explain My reasoning with This line,...


Seems to Me, the vacuum signal gets Lost when Overcarbing....
I think a 600/ 650cfm is the Idea size for Most SBCs....


it can yes but there are more factors involved...intake design and head port velocity as well...

but yes for the *most* part a 500-650cfm carb is the way to go...

for the simple fact the air speed through the smaller venturis are faster and helps feed anything that maybe lost from there to the chamber itself...

with a 4 barrel the signal is alot stronger than it is on the 2 barrel largely in part due to the size of the venturis...the 2 barrel has larger bores....but only 2 of them...

You may have heard of him,,,, Barry Grant..:eek:
He used to build a MEAN Q/Jet

yes I do...the person I learned from was close to this man...another person I learned from was one of his under studies...

I still have a rare Q-Jet that came on a Ford way back when....
 

fabrimacator21

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Jun 28, 2009
Messages
286
Re: 305 Block

if you have a 400cfm 2-barrel carb or a 600cfm 4 barrel carb it wont matter they will both provide the SAME amount of fuel....

or even a 850cfm or...what ever...there is NO such thing as over carbing an engine...

Ok... looks like I learned something today but I have a question...

If a 450 cfm carb and a 650 provide the same amount of fuel then why isn't the 650 running extremely lean when it's using ALL of it's flow capabilities?

That just doesn't make sense to me. Is it all done by vacuum?

Also I couldn't tell you how many times I've heard of people, statistics, ratings, etc claiming less mpg with a 4bb over a 2bbl (in cars).

I'm not even old enough to know anything about carbs. I'm a efi guy so bare with me.
 

jtybt

Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Aug 5, 2009
Messages
730
Re: 305 Block

Don't feel bad, I don'y know diddly about EFI.:p
 

180shabah

Rear Admiral
Joined
Mar 26, 2005
Messages
4,995
Re: 305 Block

If a 450 cfm carb and a 650 provide the same amount of fuel then why isn't the 650 running extremely lean when it's using ALL of it's flow capabilities?

The engine (350cid) still only needs approx 500CFM at 5000rpm at 100%VE. subtract losses as the air is drawn through the vlaves, heads, intake manifold and finally the carb and air filter/flame arrestor. Actual air consumption is closer the 425CFM. Also remember that when CFM is measured through a "device" it is not the absolute maximum flow possible. Rather it is the flow rate at a given applied pressure or vacuum. Even though a 450CFM carb is capable of flowing more air than the engine will actually use, it is still a restriction to free breathing. A larger carb offers less restriction, thus higher flow, thus more power.

That just doesn't make sense to me. Is it all done by vacuum?

Yes carbs opperate on vacuum. As the air rushes through it literally sucks gas from a "tube".

Also I couldn't tell you how many times I've heard of people, statistics, ratings, etc claiming less mpg with a 4bb over a 2bbl (in cars).

Again -

why do we install a larger carb? to get more power.

why do we want more power? to go faster.

What happens when we go faster? we use more fuel.


Your an EFI guy...what happens when you install a larger throttle body. At idle and cruise - not much changes other than noise and slight changes in throttle response. Actual airflow and thus fuel required to match it are unchanged. WOT - you have higher airflow and more power. A carb is just a throttle body with a "fuel leak" in the top.
 

dr_bowtie

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
281
Re: 305 Block

Ok... looks like I learned something today but I have a question...

If a 450 cfm carb and a 650 provide the same amount of fuel then why isn't the 650 running extremely lean when it's using ALL of it's flow capabilities?

That just doesn't make sense to me. Is it all done by vacuum?

Also I couldn't tell you how many times I've heard of people, statistics, ratings, etc claiming less mpg with a 4bb over a 2bbl (in cars).

I'm not even old enough to know anything about carbs. I'm a efi guy so bare with me.


1st of all why do you think the 650cfm would be lean when it's using its flow capabilities...I guess you need to explain that more...

like I said all a carb is...is a "controlled fuel leak" you are moving air thru the carb created by vacuum from the pistons pulling air into teh chambers...

Now we know that gas should be mixed with air at around 14:1 for normal driving...notice I said normal we aint going into power mode or anything like that but eh same applies...

so the carbs job is to put enough fuel into the stream of air to create this 14:1 value...no more no less... now engine efficiency, venturi size, booster shape and size all play factors too...as well as the intake and head port velocities...

now just givin the carb it doesnt know,nor does it care what engine it is on to make the given AFR (Air Fuel Ratio) alot of carbs are set of with the correct AFR on a flow bench (Edelbrock anyone?) and they will run pretty much on any engine....

the reason it wont run lean after the engine exceeds the cfm rating is that is still produces the same AFR..that is a "Constant" the carb will then act as a Restricter and the engine wont be able to accelerate much beyond...I shouldn't say that because it will but a smaller carb will limit Maximum RPM...

Now when you go from a 2 barrel carb such as the 2GC Rochester carb to a 4 barrel carb such as the Weber 650 cfm AFB style carb there is NO way you can get worse mileage if you run both carbs just on 2 barrels...in fact the 4 barrel should see a little gain in both performance and efficiency due in fact that the Primaries on the 4barrel are smaller than the 2 barrel and thus the signal will be stronger at the lower RPM range and the carb will meter fuel more efficiently...

now if you tip into the 4 barrel you will only use more fuel once you exceed the capacity of the 2barrel carbs rating...basically because the 2 barrel was the restriction and the 4barrel will run right past that restriction and allow for more power...now in terms of fuel consumption you will only see more fuel consumption if the jetting is wrong on the carb Primary and secondary side combined OR the RPM is higher than the 2 barrel was/is at WOT....

Carbs are ONLY designed to be efficient in the middle range of use on either end of the RPM scale they are very different...mainly due to booster design...one that has great idle quality will often lack high RPM potential and efficiency....and vice versus

this is where fuel injection rules but only in a Dry system with Sequential fire systems...

Fuel injection like TBI and MPI and Tuned Port (MPI and Tuned Port are batch fire injection) are very easy and simple once you understand them...only thing most lack is the tools to set them to be variable...there are no mixture screws like carbs...the O2 sensor and MAP/MAF are the mixture screws and the cold start sensor is the choke....
 

fabrimacator21

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Jun 28, 2009
Messages
286
Re: 305 Block

GREAT info and explanation.

I just didn't realize that carbs are vacuum operated as far as drawing fuel goes. I guess I should have though.:redface: Pretty simple once you explained it. :):cool:
 

dr_bowtie

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
281
Re: 305 Block

if you want to understand how a carbs basic principle works...put a straw in a soda pop and then use a compressed air nozzle (blow tool) and try holding it next to the straw at a 45deg angle across the top and blow...

the air blowing across the top of the straw will pull the soda up and out of the straw and atomize it too....now vary the amount of pressure and that the rpm range of the engine...it will pull more or less fuel according to air pressure...

same thing as an engine except instead of using compressed air pushing....the engine creates vacuum...doesnt matter how the air goes across the straw as long as it does and it's strong enough to pull the soda out...;)
 

jtybt

Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Aug 5, 2009
Messages
730
Re: 305 Block

Dang you're good Doc! You could write a book on carbs.
 

dr_bowtie

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
281
Re: 305 Block

it comes natural to me...most people dont really understand engines or carbs...they think they are application specific..they are NOT...

Plus it helps I went to school very early in life and took High Performance classes back in my second year of high school...they were only offered in summer classes and you had to pay a boat load for them...I did

When I decided to get into engines I wanted to be the BEST so I trained under the best...and I paid for that too...think Karate Kid...

The part about writing is that I am not a good writer...you can tell by my style. And there are many books out there that can teach you the same thing (bathroom material anyone) the GM Q-Jet Performance book is a good one to read...although it is pretty technical and hard to follow unless you have a technical frame of mind...I dont really...

The learn about learning is you have to be taught in a way you can understand and people understand things differently...so teaching is hard...I try to explain in a way I understand...like carbs for dummies..

beings I have been build engines a long, long time this has given me time to learn alot about what I know...I do NOT know it all and I never will but I do know alot...My Teacher was also a racer back in the day that dominated everything he got into...he didnt stay in it because when you win alot you get bored...I do to...BUT he insisted to think like him and to do so you MUST learn teh principles and basics before you can advance into other areas...

His biggest peeve was learning to think outside the box...that alone taught me alot...he also taught me engines to pay attention to every aspect of an engine and to everyone else it has gotten me far...I do this for fun and no more...

I never wanted to be one of those guy who races for a living...that takes the fun out of the sport...

as for writing a book...no

Smokey Yunik did that already....look up his theory on the 5 cycles of combustion....yes 5
 
Top