Aluminum diameter vs. stainless

Bigskyboat

Seaman
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
62
Hello. 1997 crestliner sportfish 3.0 Volvo penta. Aluminum prop 15x17. Looking to upgrade to stainless steel. Wanting to keep the 17 pitch, what is my leanincy in my diameter? Thank you.
 

QBhoy

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Mar 10, 2016
Messages
8,348
Hi
Not totally certain, without some more details, but I can tell you that in most cases, the similar stainless version will have a slightly less diameter. Good news is that this may keep your rpms similar or not a million miles away from current anyway (presuming you are happy with the current rpms)
Also worth noting that the art calculating the effect different diameters will have (with same pitch) is a bit of a mystery to most. Also that all boats perform and react differently to different props.
No real better way to test than to try different props.
If you do find a stainless prop at 15x17" (very unusual size for stainless), then the revs will likely drop by 100 rpm, give or take a few.
Not an easy thing to presume, as you will know. It's a black art !!
 

jimmbo

Supreme Mariner
Joined
May 24, 2004
Messages
13,652
You have the choice of many different brands and models to put on your Volvo. On my 5.7, I have run the stock Volvo AL prop(21). After 10 hrs I switched to the Raker(20) I had on my outboard, Had to get the rubber rub changed. For the past 10 yrs, I have been running a Mercury Enertia(20). The Dia of all three propa re different, as are the Rake, Cup, and blade area.
In the mid 80s I bought a Mercury brand SS for my 115hp merc. Compared to the AL of the same pitch, the SS was either a 1/4" or 1/2" larger in Dia. My rpms stayed within 50. the speed was within 1/2 mph. The SS had a bit more Rake and slightly more cup and did hold on better in turns at higher trim settings. Neither prop was a 'Performace Prop' That was over 30 yrs ago, and great strides in prop design and performance have occurred.

The SS vs. AL debate has been going on for over 40 yrs. SS is about 5 times stronger than AL, so blades can be much stronger, or they can be much thinner with the same strength. Some SS props are on one end of the scale, others go the other way. Usually it a combination of thinner blade but still tougher than AL. Thinner blades are more efficient and the extra strength allows for more complexity regarding blade shape. The extra strength, does have an Achilles Heel, AL props often, upon impact, break blades off. SS, being stronger tends to bend. The day I put my SS on the VP, I found a ridge of rocks about 20 inches under water, I was only going about 22 mph but it tore the blades of the SS prop and bent the propshaft.
img579b.jpg
 

Bigskyboat

Seaman
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
62
Thanks for the info. I think I need to do a lot more research. Another question...I have two pedestal seats on starboard, a lounger on port side. Any idea where the gas tank on my boat is if I want to put two pedestals where my lounger is? It's not in my manual and I can't find it online. I really don't want to pull up my floor to see. I'd hate to put a hole in my floor and hit the tank.
 

fhhuber

Lieutenant
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
1,365
No change in blade shape... no change in prop size based on material.

If they used the same mold that would make it easy.
they don't...

You are looking at the load change based on change in blade shape. Its not a lot but might allow going to the next higher pitch or increasing 1/4 to 1 inch diameter
(if you already had the optimum aluminum prop)

But I'd find a shop that has loaner test props so you can do actual testing of a couple to verify. Or just stay with the same pitch, diameter and blade count.
 
Top