Re: Any insurance experts out there?
I was not attacking you Bob, I was pointing out that your state is nuts.
And thanks for the link. The concept i am trying to explain is explained in the first sentence and then in the first paragraph of the next section. Where it says that a hit an run driver that leaves the scene can be considered uninsured, but that he has to be IDENTIFIED! Now I am attacking you. It's a simple concept, you even read it, so why are you questioning me?
Insurance does indeed vary from state to state. But to call an unknown vehicle strike and "Uninsured Motorist" claim is just insane. So I stand corrected, JB's right this coverage can vary. But it shouldn't.
So best of luck to you, maybe MN will have crazy laws that let the unknown be classified as uninsured?
I was not attacking you Bob, I was pointing out that your state is nuts.
And thanks for the link. The concept i am trying to explain is explained in the first sentence and then in the first paragraph of the next section. Where it says that a hit an run driver that leaves the scene can be considered uninsured, but that he has to be IDENTIFIED! Now I am attacking you. It's a simple concept, you even read it, so why are you questioning me?
Insurance does indeed vary from state to state. But to call an unknown vehicle strike and "Uninsured Motorist" claim is just insane. So I stand corrected, JB's right this coverage can vary. But it shouldn't.
So best of luck to you, maybe MN will have crazy laws that let the unknown be classified as uninsured?