are parts books often wrong?

kentrx1

Seaman
Thread starter
Joined
Jul 15, 2005
Messages
57
Have a 1991 mariner 60 hp serial number 0D054043. Had an issue with the charging a few weeks ago, and with the help of this forum determined it was probably the regulator/rectifier. according to several references i checked, mine should have had the rectifier/regulator-----but upon opening the engine up it only had a rectifier. on the one hand it saved me alot of money, but it concerns me that i can not look up the correct part by my serial number. is this a common issue?
 

Faztbullet

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 2, 2008
Messages
15,938
Re: are parts books often wrong?

What parts books are you using?? Some books do not list updates. Below is parts diagram I got when looked it up.
 

Attachments

  • 15.jpg
    15.jpg
    11.8 KB · Views: 0

Chris1956

Honorary Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 25, 2004
Messages
29,255
Re: are parts books often wrong?

Kem, I have always found Dougrussell.com to be 100% accurate. I would also think Mercurypartsexpress.com would also be accurate.
 

AMD Rules

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
Sep 23, 2004
Messages
1,707
Re: are parts books often wrong?

I agree, based on the serial number you provided I would expect that motor to have both a regulator and a rectifier:

816770T RECTIFIER (Item#16)
883072T REGULATOR-VOLTAGE (Item#39)

Are you sure that is 0D054043 and not 0B054043 ?
 

Attachments

  • 0D054043.JPG
    0D054043.JPG
    65.3 KB · Views: 0

j_martin

Admiral
Joined
Sep 22, 2006
Messages
7,474
Re: are parts books often wrong?

Those 2 parts don't work together. Either one or the other would be installed, but not both.

I suspect one of the small cables pictured (40) is an adapter from one to the other.


hope it helps
John
 

kentrx1

Seaman
Thread starter
Joined
Jul 15, 2005
Messages
57
Re: are parts books often wrong?

I agree, based on the serial number you provided I would expect that motor to have both a regulator and a rectifier:

816770T RECTIFIER (Item#16)
883072T REGULATOR-VOLTAGE (Item#39)

Are you sure that is 0D054043 and not 0B054043 ?

it was definitely OD.......

thanks for your response.
 
Top