I agree 100%Ted on QubeTV said:The results of unchecked immigration. The number one male child name in Brittan is now Mohammad - because they had too many Neville's.
Doesn't sound like much of a bomb to me. Incendarary device maybe, and bad news for the Mercedes perhaps, but not much of a bomb.
We've got to keep up that irrational fear though!
Doesn't sound like much of a bomb to me. Incendarary device maybe, and bad news for the Mercedes perhaps, but not much of a bomb.
"IRRATIONAL"? Alrighty then.pw said:We've got to keep up that irrational fear though!
We've got to keep up that irrational fear though!
You are a joke. Now they hit the airport. But hey, as long you have gay marriage, legal baby murder, welfare and crack ho's... you guys are happy!
Another joke. You wont be happy until they succeed?
I take it you're working under the assumption that you have been putting forth well-considered arguements.
Now listen to the radio and television pundits telling you that everything that is happening is OK, and that if you disagree and demand the rights guaranteed you by the framers of our Bill of Rights, you must be a witch/Japanese/Commie/Jew-sympathizer and you deserve whatever you get.
No, that satisfies us. If you want us happy, you have to give up ownership of private property, belief in God, and legs that don't end in cloven hooves. I mean, if you're going to generalize about liberals, at least get it right.
Now let's get this straight. Are you talking about that "Airport Plot" where three guys with no money and no bombs had plotted to blow up an entire neighborhood by reinventing the rules of how fuel burns, or the guys who crashed a jeep in Glasgow, causing a little fire? Minor inconveniences, for which we're being told to nuke countries, suspect entire religions, etc. To me, that seems irrational. To me, it seems even more irrational than the belief that you can blow up an airplane terminal by crashing into a steel and glass door.
Yep. Let me restate the one I used above so you can understand it.
See the Government.
See the "Average Person."
The Government wants to keep the average person under control.
It knows it can do so through fear.
It also knows that creating fear, then pretending to attack the cause of the fear is a good way to create a sense of reliance on government.
See the Witch in Salem in 1692, the Japanese-American citizen in California in 1944, the film producer in 1950, the Jew in Germany in 1939.
Now watch the government getting everyone up in a lather about these people, and then starting to take away the average person's civil rights claiming it's a response to the threat.
Now listen to the radio and television pundits telling you that everything that is happening is OK, and that if you disagree and demand the rights guaranteed you by the framers of our Bill of Rights, you must be a witch/Japanese/Commie/Jew-sympathizer and you deserve whatever you get.
Now, see what's happening around you. Ask yourself whether we were aided by these things that happened in the past. Ask yourself whether we are being aided by the fear and self-aggrandizement being spread by this ineffective and immoral administration.
OK, now think of a clever one-liner to dismiss this and stick your head back in the sand.
Lesson over.
And I wouldn't have thought a truck full of fertilizer would have brought down the Oklahoma building or putting a big hole in the WTC. Then again, how many people does a bomb have to kill before it is considered a signifcant bomb?
A truck load of fertilizer mixed with fuel oil is a significant bomb. a 50 gallon drum of gas may be an incendary device, but it ain't no dangerous bomb.