Court Restores Inmates' Voting Rights

Haut Medoc

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Jun 29, 2004
Messages
10,645
Re: Court Restores Inmates' Voting Rights

wiser people than you and me long ago decided that it would be in society's best interest to bar felons from voting
Who was that ? The Puritans?
I think that we should have some dunkings & burning as the stake, too....
I think that alot of crimes that are classified as felonies shouldn't be....
I also think that some that are not, should be....
There are more shades to justice than black & white....JK
 

crunch

Commander
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
2,844
Re: Court Restores Inmates' Voting Rights

Haut, again you have shone the wisdom of putting teats on a boar hog... they are there, but don't do much good.

Let's look at this.

Felons, for what ever reason have shone a glaring disrespect for the laws of this society... they have broken the laws of our land... still with me?

Now think long and hard at this.

What would make you think they would be responsible voters?

In Oregon a convicted felon has no right to vote until he/she has gone through a court process to have that conviction "set aside and sealed". They look at your record since conviction to see if you are a law abiding citizen since your completion of sentence, and more than 1 conviction of a felony makes it a no go for the felon... he/she is forever disenfranchised.

Do you really want people that can't live by the rules voting?... I mean, get real!!!!
 

jtexas

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Oct 13, 2003
Messages
8,646
Re: Court Restores Inmates' Voting Rights

Boomyal said:
"Liberals believe that defining right and wrong is the beginning of the problem, while conservatives believe that defining right and wrong is the beginning of the solution . . . "
QC?

I believe that defining the problem is the beginning of the solution. ;)


hey crunch, I realize this wasn't your pointt, but I just couldn't help pointing out that "voting responsibly" isn't a requirement for voting 8)

I had always thought it was a federal law prevented convicted felons from voting - maybe that's just in federal elections? if so, let Cali do whatever they want - you know, state's rights and all that...
 

Haut Medoc

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Jun 29, 2004
Messages
10,645
Re: Court Restores Inmates' Voting Rights

I'm sure it's OK for them to keep paying taxes though.....
Wouldn't want to abride that right!......
Once again, this is my problem with die hard conservatives.....
It always has to be black or white......
Firetruck up & you will burn in hell fire forever.....JK
 

Plainsman

Rear Admiral
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
4,062
Re: Court Restores Inmates' Voting Rights

Haut said:
I'm sure it's OK for them to keep paying taxes though.....
Wouldn't want to abride that right!......
Once again, this is my problem with die hard conservatives.....
It always has to be black or white......
Firetruck up & you will burn in hell fire forever.....JK

I think paying taxes is a law not a right, so they must do that or go to jail, correct?

Trying to compare apples to oranges just doesn't work, at least not in the real world.
Why are you so h#ll bound for these criminals to vote? Do the dems need them that bad to win a Presidency?
 

Boomyal

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Aug 16, 2003
Messages
12,072
Re: Court Restores Inmates' Voting Rights

"hey crunch, I realize this wasn't your pointt, but I just couldn't help pointing out that "voting responsibly" isn't a requirement for voting"


Boy, ain't that the truth. Most recent evidences were that half the population voted for Mr Environmentalist, then for the Vet.
 

crunch

Commander
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
2,844
Re: Court Restores Inmates' Voting Rights

hey crunch, I realize this wasn't your pointt, but I just couldn't help pointing out that "voting responsibly" isn't a requirement for voting

Ain’t that the ever loving truth, but the misfits of society shouldn't be given a go card just because they are misfits?
 

Bondo

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 17, 2002
Messages
71,082
Re: Court Restores Inmates' Voting Rights

Haut said:
I'm sure it's OK for them to keep paying taxes though.....
Wouldn't want to abride that right!...........JK

There you go Again,...........Ya gotta get the Words,+ Meanings Right........

Voting is a Right,............

Paying your Taxes is a Responsibility to society...........

And, By Not upholding your Responsibility to society,...........
You'll Loose your Rights................

Big Differences Here,.........Apples,+ Oranges again........
 

WillyBWright

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Dec 29, 2003
Messages
8,200
Re: Court Restores Inmates' Voting Rights

"Most recent evidences were that half the population voted for Mr Environmentalist, then for the Vet."

And the other half voted for the dodger both times. :(
 

Bondo

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 17, 2002
Messages
71,082
Re: Court Restores Inmates' Voting Rights

WillyBWright said:
"Most recent evidences were that half the population voted for Mr Environmentalist, then for the Vet."

And the other half voted for the dodger both times. :(

Ayuh,............

Atleast the Larger Half,.................. Got it Right.........
 

Vlad D Impeller

Commander
Joined
Mar 30, 2005
Messages
2,644
Re: Court Restores Inmates' Voting Rights

"Vlad, wiser people than you and me long ago decided that it would be in society's best interest to bar felons from voting."

Wiser they may be or maybe not, that still does not answer my question.
 

jtexas

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Oct 13, 2003
Messages
8,646
Re: Court Restores Inmates' Voting Rights

Bond-o said:
Haut said:
I'm sure it's OK for them to keep paying taxes though.....
Wouldn't want to abride that right!...........JK

There you go Again,...........Ya gotta get the Words,+ Meanings Right........

Voting is a Right,............

Paying your Taxes is a Responsibility to society...........

You could say that voting is a responsibility, and paying taxes is an obligation. I think, if you link the two it kind of implies that taxes are the price you pay for voting. Not exactly, just kinda.

But voting might also be a privilege, which I would define as a right that can be revoked for cause. As distinguished from other rights, like for example, the right to a trial by jury.
 

treedancer

Commander
Joined
Apr 10, 2005
Messages
2,216
Re: Court Restores Inmates' Voting Rights


Quote boomyal

Why is it that Liberals are now attempting to deconstruct all that had been learned throughout the history of mankind, while this society continues to crumble around them?


Deconstruct all that had been learned throughout history of mankind. …What a bunch of BS


Only in your [tunnel vision /definition] of what a liberal is. Very wide brush of what is called a liberal, very narrow brush of what is called in his mind only, as the true Conservative.

Boomyal quoting double talk??? "

"Liberals believe that defining right and wrong is the beginning of the problem, while conservatives believe that defining right and wrong is the beginning of the solution . . .


The conservatives believe that” defining right and wrong is the beginning of the solution”.

Lets look at a problem shall we?

Here is a hypothetical case. Johnny got caught with a bit of pot, class 4 felony, he was broke and couldn’t pay for an attorney, he was appointed a public defender. Defining wrong, Johnny was wrong for having the pot a felony…(Yes)

Johnny lives in a state that has been taken over by the Consertives, and of course they cut funding to the Public defenders so they can build more prisons. It is the fastest growing industry in the state. Most of the jobs that used to pay well went to china.

Shall we continue the case to its finally? Public defender has an overload of cases, he can only spend about two hours on any one case, and so he tries to get Johnny to cop a plea. Johnny says what’s the deal? P.D. says that if you cop to felony 4th possession, we can get you out with time served. So Johnny says wow, what a deal seeing he has been in the can for thirty days and couldn’t make bail that means in his mind the he is out in about two days counting time served .

Of course he isn’t thinking about the future, as he is in the can sharing a cell with Big Bubba that is looking at thirty to life for a string of armed robberies. Bubba has been in there for about eleven months, and he has been… Oooo how shall I say it, and get it past the Nannies…Lets just say that he was looking at Johnny with a lustful eye. In the conservative mind I believe we have defined what Johnny did was wrong and he is getting his just rewards.

Johnny says wow I got out of that mess without having to fight big bubba for my dignity. Now were getting into the gray area, did Johnny serve his time? Answer (yes thirty days worth ) he has the conviction to prove it. Still can’t vote, did Johnny do the right thing? Well he served his time. In my opinion that would/should be defined as the right thing to do.

Unless you think that there never can be anything that will make up for the wrong deed of getting caught with a bit of pot in you’re possession. Of course he is serving a life term of not voting isn’t he?

So did Johnny Pass the conservative diffination for doing the right thing? (Yes) he paid his dues but still cant vote.

But he can serve in the Senate of State, and Federal, government …any body but me see any thing wrong with this?

Years later Johnny has got his act together, got married has a family, decides to run for the U.S. Senate seat in his district, seeing as he has already been a State Senator for two terms. Its rather ironic in Johnny’s mind that he could have served in the state house two terms, and run for the U.S. Senate, and still not legally vote doesn’t it? We have delved into what I think is the thought process of the conservative mind; lets venture into the dreaded liberal mind shall we.


He can serve in the Senate of State, and Federal, government …any body but me see any thing wrong with this?

<<<<There are three, and only three “positive” qualifications
for Representative in Congress set out in the United States Constitution: (1) age (25
years); (2) citizenship (7 years); and (3) inhabitancy (one must be an “inhabitant”
of the State from which chosen “when elected”).>>>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate#Qualifications

Liberals believe that defining right and wrong is the beginning of the problem,


Lets break that down a bit, and see if It was a liberal, Are a Conservative, that put that inthe Constitution . Damn the founding fathers why didn’t the declare themselves, seems that the people that put that into the Constitution didn’t put labels on themselves, shucks how can we divine it when they don’t label themselves?

Taking away voting rights for life for minor Felonies is wrong (liberals defined) as wrong. (Yes)

Seems that it is rather simple to figure out, give people another chance to make things right before prison time, and seems to be a lot of chances to lock them up later and throw away the key.

Look at the cost of incarcerating some one for a year, as apposed to locking them up especially the non-violent offenders. Cost effectiveness should be the first thing in a true conservative mind I would think.


Yes that’s the right thing to do. (Problem solved) and at less cost to boot.

[
 

Bondo

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 17, 2002
Messages
71,082
Re: Court Restores Inmates' Voting Rights

"But he can serve in the Senate of State, and Federal, government …any body but me see any thing wrong with this?"

Actually,........... You're quite Wrong here Treehugger,........

Disenfranchisement for a Felony Conviction includes,......Among other things,.........
The Loss of Voting rights,.....
Not being allowed on a Jury,.........
And,.........
Being Barred from Running for Public Office..............

That includes Any Public Office,.......... From Hy-way Commissioner to President.........

Your look at Senate Qualifications Assumes that,.....
The person Isn't a Disenfranchised Felon..................
 

ricksrster

Commander
Joined
Jun 19, 2005
Messages
2,022
Re: Court Restores Inmates' Voting Rights

OK, Since allot of you don't believe a convicts rights should ever be restored because they showed no respect for law, let's revoke all driving privileges for life for people that get a speeding ticket or other offense. They show no respect for the law, shouldn't be driving, and neither should they vote. They should just pay taxes. Jay walking same thing. Don't same these are minor offenses. The only difference between a minor and a major offense is legislation. A minor offense today could be a major felony tomorrow if legislature decide to do it for the good and safety of the public.
 

jtexas

Fleet Admiral
Joined
Oct 13, 2003
Messages
8,646
Re: Court Restores Inmates' Voting Rights

we talkin bout inmates or ex-convicts?
Federal elections or local?
 

Plainsman

Rear Admiral
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
4,062
Re: Court Restores Inmates' Voting Rights

jtexas said:
we talkin bout inmates or ex-convicts?
Federal elections or local?

It's about felons and state issues. Here in NE, the state legislation passed the bill, the govenor vetoed it, it went back and they overode they veto.

I still don't think that felons should be able to vote!
 

Kenneth Brown

Captain
Joined
Feb 3, 2003
Messages
3,481
Re: Court Restores Inmates' Voting Rights

I feel that a person should have ALL of their rights restored after so many years of the sentences completion. I've been working with felons my entire adult life and I'm not a hug a thug fella bit these are PEOPLE. Don't tell me that you haven't messed up plenty of times in life. They served their time, let those who choose to be productive citizens do so.
 

Plainsman

Rear Admiral
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Messages
4,062
Re: Court Restores Inmates' Voting Rights

Kenneth said:
I feel that a person should have ALL of their rights restored after so many years of the sentences completion. I've been working with felons my entire adult life and I'm not a hug a thug fella bit these are PEOPLE. Don't tell me that you haven't messed up plenty of times in life. They served their time, let those who choose to be productive citizens do so.

Granted, some that do come out lead a productive life and are hard workers. But with your stance on this (I feel that a person should have ALL of their rights restored after so many years of the sentences completion) a child rapist could be a day care worker or school teacher.
Or are we then going to say "Well not the real bad guys" should have their full rights restored, we'll just restore some rights to some felons. Where does it end then? Who decides which are the "real bad guys" and who is just a "bad guy"? What laws that were broken and who gets what rights?
 

treedancer

Commander
Joined
Apr 10, 2005
Messages
2,216
Re: Court Restores Inmates' Voting Rights

<<Quote Bond-O
Actually,........... You're quite Wrong here Treehugger,........


<<Quote: "But he can serve in the Senate of State, and Federal, government …any body but me see any thing wrong with this?">>>

Oooo…show me where I said any thing about a Disenfranchised Felon. What point are you trying to make?

Here’s is a little something to keep you busy, check this bird out seeing as your both in the same state.

Seems to me he will be eligible to run for office if he so desires, might want to check and see if he has been disenfranchised or not.

Maybe a copy of this chart will help you get the info from your state office. Looks to me like he will be able to vote when his parole is up unless he was disenfranchised. What I get out of the State Law in New York is that if he so desires he can run for office when his parole is up. l Free to check it out I may be wrong ,but I don’t think so.

TABLE 1: Categories of Felons Disenfranchised
under State Law


State Prison Probation Parole Ex-felons


New York X X

Sorry about the quality of the table but,it didn’t transfer very well, its accurate.I cut it out of a list of the following states.

Four states (Maine, Massachusetts, Utah, Vermont) do not disenfranchise convicted felons. Forty-six states and the District of Columbia have disenfranchisement laws that deprive convicted offenders of the right to vote while they are in prison. In thirty-two states, convicted offenders may not vote while they are on parole, and twenty-nine of these states disenfranchise offenders on probation.

Snip….
Former Senator Guy Velella: Convicted Felon, $80,000-A-Year Public Pensioner………
Velella was a high-ranking, popular Bronx Republican State Senator…………

. But it all came crashing down when Velella and two of his associates -- former state housing official Hector Del Toro and Bronx social service consultant Manuel Gonzalez -- were charged in 2002 with a 25-count indictment that alleged the Senator had accepted at least $137,000 —- and allegedly solicited $250,000 -— in return for steering public-works contracts to those who paid bribes from 1995 to 2000…..

http://www.gothamgazette.com/article//20041025/202/1156
 
Top