nphilbro
Petty Officer 1st Class
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2011
- Messages
- 304
19.6ft fiberglass
20 degree deadrise
Johnson 140
19P
Last weekend I finally got around to hooking up - and using - the 50gal in-hull tank with 10 gallons and removed the temporary 6 gallon tank I had against the transom. The hull tank is positioned roughly 2 1/2ft at back end forward of stern to 7ft front end from the stern and this has drastically changed the hull performance for the better. For the most part it planes a lot drier and the other day I even experienced a very clean ride at 18mph GPS with just 2300 rpm on smooth water (saltwater) with 2 adult men and a child. the AV plate was running just along the top of the water surface.
My question now is that I hear different recommendations on position of the AV plate for changing performance but also hull type is occasionally brought up - as in, this might only be more efficient with a flatter hull. When I set this new (to me) motor on the boat I raised it about 1" (2 mounting holes) so the AV plate is also that distance about the bottom of the transom.
When I give it hard throttle the hole shot is slow, prop seems to slip quite a bit and it seems like the stern is trying to bury itself causing excessive bow rise until it finally flattens out. It doesn't seem as though I can trim this out of it.
As mentioned above, I'm now able to find some sweet spots but I'm beginning to wonder if raising the motor is costing me more performance than I'm gaining.
If I drop the engine to make the AV even with the T-bottom what performance dynamic changes should I pay attention to?
For what it's worth, I'm running a doelfin.
Was I misguided believing raising the engine would enhance performance on a 20 degree deadrise?
Thanks,
np
(I posted some pics a week or so ago in "props" forum before I hooked up the hull tank if you need a pic)
20 degree deadrise
Johnson 140
19P
Last weekend I finally got around to hooking up - and using - the 50gal in-hull tank with 10 gallons and removed the temporary 6 gallon tank I had against the transom. The hull tank is positioned roughly 2 1/2ft at back end forward of stern to 7ft front end from the stern and this has drastically changed the hull performance for the better. For the most part it planes a lot drier and the other day I even experienced a very clean ride at 18mph GPS with just 2300 rpm on smooth water (saltwater) with 2 adult men and a child. the AV plate was running just along the top of the water surface.
My question now is that I hear different recommendations on position of the AV plate for changing performance but also hull type is occasionally brought up - as in, this might only be more efficient with a flatter hull. When I set this new (to me) motor on the boat I raised it about 1" (2 mounting holes) so the AV plate is also that distance about the bottom of the transom.
When I give it hard throttle the hole shot is slow, prop seems to slip quite a bit and it seems like the stern is trying to bury itself causing excessive bow rise until it finally flattens out. It doesn't seem as though I can trim this out of it.
As mentioned above, I'm now able to find some sweet spots but I'm beginning to wonder if raising the motor is costing me more performance than I'm gaining.
If I drop the engine to make the AV even with the T-bottom what performance dynamic changes should I pay attention to?
For what it's worth, I'm running a doelfin.
Was I misguided believing raising the engine would enhance performance on a 20 degree deadrise?
Thanks,
np
(I posted some pics a week or so ago in "props" forum before I hooked up the hull tank if you need a pic)