"Democrats' Disgrace"

OldMercsRule

OldMercsRule

Captain
Joined
Nov 30, 2006
Messages
3,340
Re: "Democrats' Disgrace"

Mr. Tree, Have not seen yer reply as to why Murky should vote fer ANY dim wit Democrat.

I don't like BIG GUBMINT, n' dim wit Dems ALL want higher taxes and cornsistently vote that way. How could we get smaller Gubmint when we feed the cancer? HMMMMMMMMM?


I LUV the Cornstatution as is. Most Democrats are proud to vote against strict Cornstructionist Judges that Republicans nominate, 'cause they view the 20 page doc as livin' n' breathin' doc, (good fer wipin' when yer on the terlet).


That lets 'em use those tax dollars to grow NANNY Gubmint, 'cause the most important thing the Cornstatution does is protect all of us from the GUBMINT. Dem appointed judges found a right to kill babies, (I can't find any words to that effect in the 20 pages), only have one functional brain cell though. Dem appointed judges ignore the PLAIN LANGUAGE in the fifth amendement n' think a local dim wit Dem government can take yer private water front property that yer strugglin' ta pay the dim wit Dem imposed property taxes, n' force ya to sell it to a big donar developer to build a resort n' get more taxes ta grow the Gubmint.

Tell me again Mr. Tree: why should ol' Murky vote fer ANY dim wit DEM. eh? Respectfully, JR
 
treedancer

treedancer

Commander
Joined
Apr 10, 2005
Messages
2,216
Re: "Democrats' Disgrace"

Terminator2poster.jpg


i,ll be back (have turds to gather.):D
 
OldMercsRule

OldMercsRule

Captain
Joined
Nov 30, 2006
Messages
3,340
Re: "Democrats' Disgrace"

treedancer said:
Terminator2poster.jpg


i,ll be back (have turds to gather.):D
Click to expand...

Mr. Tree, No need fer t**ds n' carp, jus' answer the question!

Why should any honorable American vote fer any DEM?

They CLAIM to stand fer higher taxes, n' bigger Gubmint, n' trashin' the Cornstatution by destroyin' the judicial branch of our gubmint with Tyrants in blacks robes.

I don't need a kitchen sink, I just want an INTELECTUALLY HONEST ANSWER from a USMC Vet.

Respectfully, JR
 
ricksrster

ricksrster

Commander
Joined
Jun 19, 2005
Messages
2,022
Re: "Democrats' Disgrace"

Thanks ole Merc. It made me change my signature.
 
Haut Medoc

Haut Medoc

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Jun 29, 2004
Messages
10,645
Re: "Democrats' Disgrace"


Universal health care, (ya know) like every other civilized country on the planet......;):)​
 
OldMercsRule

OldMercsRule

Captain
Joined
Nov 30, 2006
Messages
3,340
Re: "Democrats' Disgrace"

Haut Medoc said:
Universal health care, (ya know) like every other civilized country on the planet......;):)​
Click to expand...

Nah, no need to do that: Bro.

I n' other Cornservatives could raise the (non tax deductable [even though there would be great charity envolved]) funds ta send all Libs n' Dems, nair do wells, n' bums n other miss fits n' dim wits on a one way trip ta Cuber, (ya know Michael Moores' tropical paridise with the superior Health care system). As long as the dim wits would sign a legally enforcable corntract ta stay there. Problem solved: NEXT QUESTION? JR

Off Topic: Robert Spencer is on Micheal Medved RIGHT NOW!!!! JR
 
OldMercsRule

OldMercsRule

Captain
Joined
Nov 30, 2006
Messages
3,340
Re: "Democrats' Disgrace"

Haut Medoc said:
But what about the chirdren?.......:p:)​
Click to expand...

To get rid of the dim wits the Cornservatives, (good family people with real moral values: Bro), could adopt the dim wits' children. The kids might actually turn out to be good citizens. NEXT QUESTION. JR
 
bekosh

bekosh

Lieutenant
Joined
Apr 27, 2004
Messages
1,382
Re: "Democrats' Disgrace"

Haut Medoc said:
Universal health care, (ya know) like every other civilized country on the planet......;):)​
Click to expand...
Sure, just hand over 15% of your income to Big Gov and they'll give you your 'free' healthcare. I don't know about you, but I can't afford 'free' healthcare.:mad:
 
Haut Medoc

Haut Medoc

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Jun 29, 2004
Messages
10,645
Re: "Democrats' Disgrace"


If that 's what it take to 'free' the scumbag corps entities from offering it , then yes....;)
I've seen too many people get 29 hour weeks to finance 'Golden Parachutes"......
I'm just trying to lift the burden from the poor corporations, so they can keep the influx of cheap Chinese crap coming while still making a killing .......:p:);)​
 
P

PW2

Commander
Joined
Apr 21, 2004
Messages
2,719
Re: "Democrats' Disgrace"

I'm not sure what this article has to do about "honor" but if he was interested in honor, he should have not misstated Clinton's positions as articulated to the AFL-CIO.

Re the NAFTA agreement, she said it needed to be "worked on". Anything can be worked on, as virtually nothing is perfect. Now I don't know specifically what "worked on" means exactly in her view, but it certainly does not mean she came out "against it" as the article states.

BTW, all the Dem candidates, except for Kucinich, said that it needed to be worked on. Kucinich was the only one that said it should be scrapped. I suspect all of the Republican candidates would have similar responses to that

If we are discussing honor, let's at least accurately represent what people say. It's the only honorable way to approach a debate---But then honor is about the last thing Repubs are about.
 
RubberFrog

RubberFrog

Rear Admiral
Joined
Apr 9, 2005
Messages
4,268
Re: "Democrats' Disgrace"

Yeah! All we want to do is kick puppies, starve little children and cheat old people out of their social security! Because murdering babies is so honorable that we know we can't compete!
 
OldMercsRule

OldMercsRule

Captain
Joined
Nov 30, 2006
Messages
3,340
Re: "Democrats' Disgrace"

PW2 said:
I'm not sure what this article has to do about "honor" but if he was interested in honor, he should have not misstated Clinton's positions as articulated to the AFL-CIO.

Re the NAFTA agreement, she said it needed to be "worked on". Anything can be worked on, as virtually nothing is perfect. Now I don't know specifically what "worked on" means exactly in her view, but it certainly does not mean she came out "against it" as the article states.

BTW, all the Dem candidates, except for Kucinich, said that it needed to be worked on. Kucinich was the only one that said it should be scrapped. I suspect all of the Republican candidates would have similar responses to that

If we are discussing honor, let's at least accurately represent what people say. It's the only honorable way to approach a debate---But then honor is about the last thing Repubs are about.
Click to expand...

Hillary, is not as good as Bill, ('course, to be honest, niether is anyone else, fer that matter: Republican or dim wit Dem), at making carefull statements that "triangulate" her intentially cormplex message that sounds soooooo simple specifically designed to please the maximum number of dim wits n' fools. It comes accross as one thing to the Kool aid crew, n' something altogether different to everyone else. She is actually very good in a corntrolled relatively friendly environment, (like the dim wits are in right now). Obama is getting his head handed to him by her handlers.

Bottom line: Hillary never means what she says, (except when she says she wants to be President), she just says what she thinks will please; n' her followers are the first to forgive her, as we all know her ambition, and we also know what Marx said: THE ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS. Great stuff: PW2! Respectfully, JR ps: wait 'till she wins' the nod and has to face some real fire from Rudi or someone who knows how to take a punch n' kick back real hard. The "Queen of Mean" will show some teeth n' we will see how she handles LIVE FIRE when that happens. Should be great sport!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top