Re: Ethanol vs Non-Ethanol
Here are my observations.
When I was in the portable power generation market, Cummins lobbied against ethanol in the fuel for small gensets. To this date, they still do. When I was in the marine market, the NMMA was lobbying against ethanol in boats. To this date, they still lobby against it. When I was in outdoor power OPEI was lobbying against ethanol in boats. To this date they still lobby against it.
Ethanol is a negative energy fuel costing more BTU's to process than it produces.
We used aviation fuel when testing every snow blower and lawn mower because it evaporated clean and didnt leave any residue in the tank, lines, or carbs.
When I let a small engine at home sit with ethanol in the fuel system, I have to pull the carb and fuel system apart to clean it. When I use Aviation fuel, I do not have that problem. When I use non-ethanol premium I do not have the problem either.
Ethanol in fuel makes our food cost more. The only people benefiting from ethanol are the corn lobbyist. over farming fields for corn for ethanol requires heavy doses of chemicals so Monsanto makes money.
Florida doesnt have many ethanol free pumps, even less with premium so I'm forced to use the ethanol fuel.
I routinely sample test my fuel for percentage of ethanol. if over 10%, I no longer buy from that station. To date, I have excluded 15 fuel stations in Florida.
Ethanol is here due to lobbyist, we are stuck with that. I prefer to drink my corn.
Now that the horse has been beating again, I am off my soap box.