Re: Evinrude e-tec or Yamaha 4 Stroke
seahorse,<br /><br />I think everyone realizes that the E-tech is trying to compete with the 4-strokes.
<br /><br />My first point was that it doesn't seem to be competing with regard to price. Again, the 90 hp 4-stroke fuel injected Johnson or Suzuki is hundreds less. Even the Yamaha example you mentioned is only $400 more...and you're getting a proven 4-stroke.<br /><br />My second point was that if weight on a 90 hp is important to you, then why would you buy the 2-stroke E-tech, which is 40 lbs heavier (and $1,300 more expensive) than other 2-strokes?<br /><br />These are just examples for the 90 hp. I'd like to compare the other E-tech's too, but again for some odd reason Evinrude hasn't posted their specs (like they have on the rest of their outboards).<br /><br />I hope the E-tech's work out (even though other prior attempts with 2-stroke technology have fallen short). But IMO, the pricing isn't that great, and the light weight claims aren't that impressive for a 2-stroke. And a biggy...reliability and durability are unknown.<br /><br />This topic started out with someone who decided to buy an unproven 90 hp E-tech over a proven fuel injected 115 hp 4-stroke. And that would be a big mistake IMO, no matter the hype seahorse. 
seahorse,<br /><br />I think everyone realizes that the E-tech is trying to compete with the 4-strokes.