Re: Evinrude vs. Sea king
Biggest difference between your mid-to-late 60's motors and ones from the 50s and early 60's is the innards. Your motors were engineered and built to run on a 50:1 mix using common auto motor oil. No doubt that today's modern synthetics are superior, as you stated. The other difference is that older motors were made with friction bearings or bushings...which rely on a good film of lubricant to separate wearing surfaces. They weren't engineered with true ball or needle bearings because the cost of the materials needed to make true ball and needle bearings. Also, for several years after WWII the cost of true bearings, or the materials to make them, was beyond many manufacturers budgets...if they wanted to make/sell a price-competitive product. Also, the friction bearings and bushings perform well as long as you respect their need for a heavier/richer fuel
il mix. So I guess the reason was...it ain't broke, so don't fix it, as much as anything else. That's my take on it, given my knowledge of older outboards and my experiences restoring them and reading this and other similar forums.
Biggest difference between your mid-to-late 60's motors and ones from the 50s and early 60's is the innards. Your motors were engineered and built to run on a 50:1 mix using common auto motor oil. No doubt that today's modern synthetics are superior, as you stated. The other difference is that older motors were made with friction bearings or bushings...which rely on a good film of lubricant to separate wearing surfaces. They weren't engineered with true ball or needle bearings because the cost of the materials needed to make true ball and needle bearings. Also, for several years after WWII the cost of true bearings, or the materials to make them, was beyond many manufacturers budgets...if they wanted to make/sell a price-competitive product. Also, the friction bearings and bushings perform well as long as you respect their need for a heavier/richer fuel