Fighting metallic corrosion on underwater fittings

umblecumbuz

Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined
Sep 25, 2004
Messages
1,062
From various posts on different threads, there seems to be a lot of misunderstanding when it comes to metallic corrosion and its protection on small boats, so I’ve taken the liberty of posting the comments below. If there are any experts out there who can add to this information, I’m sure it will be welcome. These comments are an over-simplification, and serve to hit the bones of the corrosion problem only, but sufficient information is here to help identify and fight most small boat corrosion problems.<br /><br />Water. All water is an electrolyte. Corrosion slows in fresh, still, cold water, and is faster in warm, clear, moving salt water. That’s why a cold battery has less power to crank your car than a warm one. So fittings on a boat used in Northern lakes will last longer than in a Californian bay. This also means that corrosion can take place while your boat is on its trailer, if it has bilge water, sodden flotation foam, damp sludge in the leg, or even if it stands in the rain.<br /><br />Galvanic Corrosion. This is the correct term, although we commonly call it electrolytic corrosion. In the days of sailing ships, it was found that screwing a lump of scrap iron to the copper-bottomed hull preserved the copper from corrosion. Investigative science followed from there, and today we can table a whole range of metals in order of their susceptibility to galvanic corrosion. At the top (most noble) are platinum, gold, titanium and 316L stainless. At the bottom (least noble) are metals like cadmium, zinc, magnesium. When a galvanic couple forms, one of the metals in the couple becomes the anode and corrodes faster than it would all by itself, while the other becomes the cathode and corrodes slower than it would alone. The driving force for corrosion is a potential difference between the different materials, and water – any water – completes this circuit.<br /><br />The metals that concern us are listed here, in order of their resistance to electrolytic corrosion:<br /><br />LEAST ANODIC (Most Noble) hard to corrode<br />Titanium <br />Stainless steel - high chrome (ie. grade 316L)<br />Nickel (passive)<br />Bronzes<br />Copper<br />Brasses<br />Lead<br />Stainless Steel – low chrome<br />Cast iron<br />Wrought iron<br />Mild Steel<br />2024 aluminum<br />Zinc<br />Magnesium and its alloys<br />MOST ANODIC (least noble) easy to corrode<br /><br />Compatibility. Metals closest to each other in this Table will have the least tendency for the ‘weakest’ to corrode. Metals farthest apart will have the greatest tendency. This is good news and bad news. Use widely disssimilar metals on your underwater fittings – aluminum and stainless, for example - and you have a large corrosion potential. Sacrificial anodes, on the other hand, are purposely made from metals that easily corrode (that's why we loosely call them 'zincs'). Correctly sizing, placing and maintaining these anodes utilises this incompatibility to good effect.<br /><br />Proximity. Bad news – the closer dissimilar metals are to each other, the greater the tendency for the least noble to corrode. This means that if you have a stainless prop on an outboard leg, the leg could corrode faster than it would if you had an aluminum prop, because aluminum is ‘weaker’ in the galvanic table. The same principle applies to the proximity of any other underwater fitments. Even stainless steels, depending on their content (low chrome or high chrome) can have widely diverse corrosion resistance, and putting two types of stainless in close proximity will speed up the corrosion of one of them. The good news is that fitting anodes either in close proximity or in physical contact with ‘weak’ metals will prolong their life. So a zinc screwed tight to your outdrive leg will protect both the leg and the aluminum prop.<br /><br />Contact. Dissimilar metals in physical contact will accelerate the corrosion of the ‘weakest’. Screw a stainless bolt into an aluminum hull and corrosion will take place on the aluminum around the bolt head. No easy cure for this one, unless you also use zinc washers under the bolt head, but these will cause leaks as they corrode away. Best not to do it at all. That’s why aluminum boats use aluminum rivets.<br /><br />Cure? There is only one complete cure - keep your boat warm and dry, and never take it anywhere near water!<br /><br />Precautions. Reduce the number of dissimilar underwater metals where possible. Keep most noble and least noble fittings as far apart as possible. Fit correct anodes (differing waters require different anode materials) not just to your leg, but to other major fittings around your boat. If anodes are not fitted to stainless swim ladders or trim tabs, these items can speed the corrosion of less noble metals elsewhere on your hull – like your expensive outboard leg! Notice that most metallic fittings are on the transom - all in proximity to each other! Keep all anodes clean, regularly remove the whitish oxide that forms on the anodes with a file if necessary, and replace them when they are half gone.<br /><br />As I said - this is an over-simplification, and there are a lot of variables. But the bottom line always is - neglect spells future expensive trouble.<br /><br />Ciao
 

LubeDude

Admiral
Joined
Oct 8, 2003
Messages
6,945
Re: Fighting metallic corrosion on underwater fittings

Very interesting that this would come up today. I just had lunch yesterday with an older fellow that used to be the head chemist for Catapillar tractor and this was the main content of the discusion. He was over my head most of the time, but it was very interesting what he had to say, Its a "BIG" problem in cooling systems with todays hot running engines. His main thing was, Ground it, Ground it, Ground it! He said that some of the head gasket problems today are because of simply grounding the engine on the wrong side. Anyway, we had a great talk. Now if I can only remember half of it.
 

umblecumbuz

Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined
Sep 25, 2004
Messages
1,062
Re: Fighting metallic corrosion on underwater fittings

Lubedude,<br /><br />Your man's really up there! <br /><br />When you think that in an engine there's often cast iron, aluminum, steel and copper - all connected by a hot, dirty, moving electrolyte (the cooling water), you've got all the right ingredients for corrosion. Something's gotta give. Never thought of it like that before.<br /><br /> The guy should publish a paper on the subject.
 

JB

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Mar 25, 2001
Messages
45,907
Re: Fighting metallic corrosion on underwater fittings

Ahoy, Stillfishing!<br /><br />We Moderators really like this posting and would like to transfer it to our Engine FAQs section.<br /><br />We would like your permission to do that. You would be credited as the author.<br /><br />Thanks for your contribution. :)
 

umblecumbuz

Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined
Sep 25, 2004
Messages
1,062
Re: Fighting metallic corrosion on underwater fittings

JB<br /><br />That's an honor!<br /><br />Please feel free ...<br /><br />Ciao
 

JB

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Mar 25, 2001
Messages
45,907
Re: Fighting metallic corrosion on underwater fittings

Done. And thanks for the thousands who will get help from your article. :)
 

18rabbit

Captain
Joined
Nov 14, 2003
Messages
3,202
Re: Fighting metallic corrosion on underwater fittings

Stillfishing you did a great job on that piece and it should be a faq. :)
 

Paul Moir

Admiral
Joined
Nov 5, 2002
Messages
6,847
Re: Fighting metallic corrosion on underwater fittings

Stillfishing -<br />Great article, but I'm wondering about the two placements of Stainless on the Galvanic series you have there. You have them listed as high chrome and low chrome, where I think you should have them as 'passive' and 'active' (respectively). I believe that most common stainless fittings and fasteners we deal with in boating have a passivated layer and so the 'passive' position on the galvanic series is the one we're most concerned with. <br /><br />I would like other's input if I'm wrong here, and I don't want to take away from stillfishing's work here. I wouldn't have mentioned it except stainless is pretty important when it comes to boating.<br /><br /> <br />Long galvanic series table. <br /><br />Note how 304 occupies both positions #40 and #71 (wildly different) and 316L #53 and #76.<br /><br />Again, thanks stillfishing! :)
 

umblecumbuz

Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined
Sep 25, 2004
Messages
1,062
Re: Fighting metallic corrosion on underwater fittings

Thanks Paul,<br /><br />Your comments about passivity are right. The table I posted omitted many metals, and also generalised a lot. For instance, there are different grades of brass, bronze, titanium, etc - so the above is over-simplified. The other factor that I found hard to dial in is the diversity of water types that our boats will be used in - fresh, salt, cold, warm, clear, murky, and so on. They each have an effect on the susceptibility to corrosion of the different metals we use.<br /><br />The thrust of my post was to try and alert all to the need for protection and common-sense in using metals under the waterline. Hopefully, I've done that. I'm sure there'll be a lot more posts yet, each adding to our awareness!<br /><br />Ciao
 
Top